Jump to content

Battlemaster 2C?


30 replies to this topic

#1 theta123

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,006 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 07:35 AM

soooo

will we see a double cockpit?

And what will its loadout/hardpoints be?

#2 Paigan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blazing
  • The Blazing
  • 2,789 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 07:45 AM

Double cockpit?
What for?
And is it worth the "we would have to rewrite half the game to implement that" effort?
Think of all the other stuff that could be made a reality with those man-decades of work.

Sometimes it's hard to see where people get their illusions from ...

#3 Scout Derek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Divine
  • The Divine
  • 8,022 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSomewhere where you'll probably never go to

Posted 07 May 2015 - 07:48 AM

View Posttheta123, on 07 May 2015 - 07:35 AM, said:

soooo

will we see a double cockpit?

And what will its loadout/hardpoints be?


Sorry, but not enough variants, let alone to be in lore (Mind you only seen in MW4: Mercs) to be a viable mech to be in this game.

Nevermind.

Edited by Scout Derek, 07 May 2015 - 08:19 AM.


#4 theta123

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,006 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:14 AM

"[color=#00FFFF]- BattleMaster BLR-2C and Cataphract CTF-0X variants - Gift Store first."[/color]

http://mwomercs.com/...43#entry4405643

Ya'll dint saw the road map of may?

#5 Scout Derek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Divine
  • The Divine
  • 8,022 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationSomewhere where you'll probably never go to

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:19 AM

View Posttheta123, on 07 May 2015 - 08:14 AM, said:

"[color=#00FFFF]- BattleMaster BLR-2C and Cataphract CTF-0X variants - Gift Store first."[/color]

http://mwomercs.com/...43#entry4405643

Ya'll dint saw the road map of may?


Ahh okay, thought you meant the Clan Variant. Well, all I can say is that it'll have a few energy heat gen quirks for it.

#6 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:19 AM

View Posttheta123, on 07 May 2015 - 08:14 AM, said:

"[color=#00FFFF]- BattleMaster BLR-2C and Cataphract CTF-0X variants - Gift Store first."[/color]

http://mwomercs.com/...43#entry4405643

Ya'll dint saw the road map of may?

Sooo a 1G with some Star League upgrades and a dual cockpit...

#7 Malleus011

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:22 AM

So, presumably a Command Console (snicker) and BAP ... perhaps ECM?

#8 Saint Scarlett Johan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hearing Impaired
  • Hearing Impaired
  • 3,349 posts
  • LocationOn the Delta side of Vicksburg

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:43 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 07 May 2015 - 08:19 AM, said:

Sooo a 1G with some Star League upgrades and a dual cockpit...


Which in the TRO, IIRC, is just a command console.

#9 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:50 AM

View PostMalleus011, on 07 May 2015 - 08:22 AM, said:

So, presumably a Command Console (snicker) and BAP ... perhaps ECM?


It will not have ECM.

#10 Ultimax

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,979 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:51 AM

View PostJoseph Mallan, on 07 May 2015 - 08:19 AM, said:

Sooo a 1G with some Star League upgrades and a dual cockpit...


It will be better than the 1G because it will be in the gift store. :lol:

Edited by Ultimatum X, 07 May 2015 - 08:52 AM.


#11 Koniks

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • Moderate Giver
  • 1,301 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 08:54 AM

8 energy hardpoints. It'll depend on whether they give it the bad 1G agility or the good 1D agility. Also: quirks.

Could be a better-armored TDR-5SS to compete with the Gargoyle (for whatever that's worth).

#12 Malleus011

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 09:09 AM

It wouldn't harm anything if it did have ECM, and it has just as much justification for it as the AS7-D-DC.

#13 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 07 May 2015 - 09:10 AM

View PostMalleus011, on 07 May 2015 - 09:09 AM, said:

It wouldn't harm anything if it did have ECM, and it has just as much justification for it as the AS7-D-DC.


I know, but Russ said it will not.

Edited by Gas Guzzler, 07 May 2015 - 09:10 AM.


#14 Lyoto Machida

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 5,082 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 09:29 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 07 May 2015 - 09:10 AM, said:


I know, but Russ said it will not.


Russ has said a lot of things in the past.

#15 TercieI

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 8,170 posts
  • LocationThe Far Country

Posted 07 May 2015 - 09:42 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 07 May 2015 - 09:10 AM, said:


I know, but Russ said it will not.


Did he? I just heard him say the CTF will have ECM.

#16 Malleus011

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:06 PM

Hmm. I kind of assumed it would have, since they were adding it. Otherwise, do we really need another Battlemaster variant, with pretty much the same hard points as the current ones?

I mean, I'm happy to have it, and it's easy for PGI to implement, but unless it is a 'command' model, why would they expect people to drop $ for it in the gift store?

#17 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 07 May 2015 - 12:11 PM

https://twitter.com/...155663174111233

View PostTerciel1976, on 07 May 2015 - 09:42 AM, said:


Did he? I just heard him say the CTF will have ECM.


#18 TercieI

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 8,170 posts
  • LocationThe Far Country

Posted 07 May 2015 - 01:43 PM

Relativity pointless then. :(

#19 C E Dwyer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,274 posts
  • LocationHiding in the periphery, from Bounty Hunters

Posted 07 May 2015 - 01:52 PM

View PostMalleus011, on 07 May 2015 - 12:06 PM, said:

Hmm. I kind of assumed it would have, since they were adding it. Otherwise, do we really need another Battlemaster variant, with pretty much the same hard points as the current ones?

I mean, I'm happy to have it, and it's easy for PGI to implement, but unless it is a 'command' model, why would they expect people to drop $ for it in the gift store?

they hope people are stoopid

that or it will have clearly better quirks than those in the game, the new HGn got an armour buff none of the old ones have

or of course they are redoing the 3d model to make it look like

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/BattleMaster

in which case my mortgage is going on it

Edited by Cathy, 07 May 2015 - 01:58 PM.


#20 Kristov Kerensky

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,909 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 02:08 PM

Dual cockpits unlikely, probably just include a command console on it.

The original TT variant was a Command Mech, 2 cockpits and a C3 master so the commander could actually be in the battle area and coordinate everything without having to deal with piloting the Mech in combat at the same time. Keep in mind, old Star League variant, it had some higher tech toys than most IS Mechs by 3000.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users