Jump to content

Do You Consider That Destructible Terrain Will Make Fps Drop Hard


87 replies to this topic

#1 bad arcade kitty

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,100 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:07 PM

and it will

we should be ready for it for a huge fps drop is coming

#2 TyphonCh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Clamps
  • The Clamps
  • 1,074 posts
  • LocationDue North

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:21 PM

They'll probably have it on a slider bar for how much destruction effect happens at once. Or kind of like particle effects, turn them up or turn them down... If destructible terrain is added on an 'on' or 'off' setting it may put the guy with it on at a disadvantage because the tree on his screen is burning and obstructing his view while the guy with it off can see clearly. Hard to say how they'll do it but they'll have to cater to people with lower end systems so it won't nuke their frames

#3 bad arcade kitty

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,100 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:23 PM

>Or kind of like particle effects, turn them up or turn them down...

i hope for this, because otherwise it may need another pc upgrade for me and for quite a few people too

#4 XX Sulla XX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,094 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:25 PM

Really hope it does not kill FPS.

#5 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:26 PM

Optimization? What optimization?

#6 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:28 PM

Get a better computer?

#7 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:32 PM

i dunno why we even need destructible terrain...

its not like any of the things well be able to destroy will have an effect on the game.

we cant destroy anything meaningful like buildings for example...

#8 Burktross

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,663 posts
  • LocationStill in closed beta

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:34 PM

It wont be dmm or anything. Source engine grade stuff. Read: 2004 processing power.

#9 Cyborne Elemental

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,000 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:34 PM

Destroyable terrain, no real point in this.

Destructible props, or at least damageable props would be cool.

That really isn't going to lag anything.

Smoke and particle effects is what will lag FPS, depending on how they do it.

#10 FatYak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 585 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:59 PM

View PostKhobai, on 10 May 2015 - 06:32 PM, said:

i dunno why we even need destructible terrain...

its not like any of the things well be able to destroy will have an effect on the game.

we cant destroy anything meaningful like buildings for example...

Nope, but there are a few maps where i would love to knock some damn trees down, especially in CW

#11 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 10 May 2015 - 07:03 PM

Especially on the damn Forest Colony.

Edited by El Bandito, 10 May 2015 - 07:04 PM.


#12 GenghisJr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 278 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 10 May 2015 - 07:14 PM

I am concerned this will make the game less playable

#13 MauttyKoray

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,831 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 07:40 PM

We've had destructible stuff like this since THE 90'S. If your computer can't handle a feature that has been around for two and a half decades I would suggest a new computer.

Being serious though: It shouldn't be a problem. If done correctly it will be a physics option in the graphics settings, lowest would cause a tree to fall like a cardboard plank and stick to where it fell, meanwhile max could use actual physics, have the tree bounce down a hill afterward or something, roll down a mountain, etc.

#14 N0MAD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,757 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:06 PM

View PostMister D, on 10 May 2015 - 06:34 PM, said:


Smoke and particle effects is what will lag FPS, depending on how they do it.


Im going to bring up bad design decisions that are going to affect performance.
I watched a video of the upcoming Burning trees, watched as a flamer... well made fire and sparks, come out of a tree it seemed.
A mech flamed a tree or trees, there was much smoke and lots of sparks for a few or so seconds then... nothing.. trees were still there not blackened not burnt not charred... nothing just the original tree, trees.
Whats the point, ummmm, is this going to run server side?.

#15 EgoSlayer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 1,909 posts
  • Location[REDACTED]

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:12 PM

View PostXX Sulla XX, on 10 May 2015 - 06:25 PM, said:

Really hope it does not kill FPS.

View PostFupDup, on 10 May 2015 - 06:26 PM, said:

Optimization? What optimization?

View PostMechwarrior Buddah, on 10 May 2015 - 06:28 PM, said:

Get a better computer?



It likely will cause a frame rate drop, and it won't really matter much what kind of rig you run. Sure there is some level of coding that can work around the issue, but the fact is that DX 11 has an effective limit of about 10,000 draw calls and it is a single threaded task. This is why Intel CPU's are far better 'optimized' than AMD, modern Intel CPUs do more instructions per clock than AMD CPUs and can mask this single threaded bottleneck to a point.

Throwing more objects, and deformable objects into the mix is going to increase the draw calls to the point that everyone will suffer unless other draw calls are reduced.

Or if the game ever gets to DX 12 with the multi-threaded draw call engine that exponentially increases the effective draw call limit. But I don't think that will happen since we are stuck on DX9 to support most of the player base.

Edited by EgoSlayer, 10 May 2015 - 08:20 PM.


#16 Alistair Winter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 10,823 posts
  • LocationBergen, Norway, FRR

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:13 PM

View PostMechwarrior Buddah, on 10 May 2015 - 06:28 PM, said:

Get a better computer?

I think that's the answer, yeah. With a few exceptions, most of the people complaining about low fps seem to be people who can't quite grasp the idea that you need a relatively new computer to play relatively new games. I.e. if your computer is 8 years old and wasn't really that good 8 years ago, get a better computer.

There also seems to be a lot of MWO players who just started playing the game with an old computer, because they don't normally play FPS games at all and don't spend a lot of money on hardware. But they just started playing MWO anyway, because they're huge Battletech / Mechwarrior fans. And then they demand that the game run smoothly on their old Pentium 100 computer. "I pressed the turbo button, but it's still not working!"

#17 CHH Badkarma

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 831 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:20 PM

If anyone has an FPS issue when it is rolled out, please do not cry and QQ. Upgrade your PC. This game has already been dumbed down enough for people with low spec machines already.

Edited by CHH Badkarma, 10 May 2015 - 08:20 PM.


#18 bad arcade kitty

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 5,100 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:29 PM

View PostCHH Badkarma, on 10 May 2015 - 08:20 PM, said:

This game has already been dumbed down enough for people with low spec machines already.


are you kidding
it's the most ridiculously poorly coded over-pc-demanding game i ever saw

#19 N0ni

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nightmare
  • The Nightmare
  • 2,357 posts
  • LocationIn a GTR Simulator Cockpit

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:30 PM

Here's to hoping performance doesn't drop too far like when Highlanders were first released.

#20 Kristov Kerensky

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 2,909 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:38 PM

View Postbad arcade kitty, on 10 May 2015 - 08:29 PM, said:


are you kidding
it's the most ridiculously poorly coded over-pc-demanding game i ever saw


Actually, it's not, I've seen much worse. I'm using an original i7 950 cpu on an Asus X58 Sabretooth board with 6g ram and a GTX 750 vcard, and I get 60fps constantly with everything cranked.

If this game barely runs for you, you seriously need to upgrade your computer because THAT is the entirety of the problem, especially if you are having to run in DX9 and/or 32bit.

Seriously, PGI has to have DX9 and a 32bit application for the game because the majority of the playerbase can NOT run higher than DX9 or in 64bit, and you are trying to tell us the coding is the problem? Get out of the catnip.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users