Jump to content

So Why Doesn't Case Work In Mwo?

Balance

47 replies to this topic

#41 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 15 June 2015 - 01:37 PM

View PostLightfoot, on 15 June 2015 - 01:09 PM, said:

Well it's night and day for me. The problem never happens on Clan mechs with the ammo stored in the leg. If they lose an arm, the side torso remains intact. If there was ammo in the Arm, it takes out the Side Torso with it. No, I am not going to bother with proving it to support. It's part of the design, not a bug. I am just asking why does CASE not work?

And many of us are telling you it's not "part of the design", and either something else is going on, or you have a bug. Because Clan Mechs that lose arms with ammo do not, and should not lose STs. If for some reason your's are, it's a bug, not "working as intended".

#42 Tiamat of the Sea

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guardian
  • Guardian
  • 1,326 posts

Posted 15 June 2015 - 01:56 PM

View PostLightfoot, on 15 June 2015 - 01:09 PM, said:

I am just asking why does CASE not work?


Because you are experiencing a bug.

#43 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 15 June 2015 - 02:22 PM

View PostLightfoot, on 15 June 2015 - 12:59 PM, said:



Next time you are in Mechlab, look at the top of each Clan mech section. Says, CASE equipped. But it doesn't work. Once an Arm with ammo is destroyed it takes out the adjacent Side Torso even when the ST is only lightly damaged. Don't you ever watch the mech damage graph?



How about I go test it; it used to be broken for Gauss when they changed the text:
Posted Image

Then they fixed it.

Tested on a Crow with an Airstrike, arm damaged, Gauss destroyed, arm gone.

ST untouched. CASE is working fine.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users