10 replies to this topic

[Rhaythe]

I've played against you guys before, and had some quite close games. This felt like a rough one on you guys. Match score at the end was close, but never felt like you guys got it together. What happened?

[Lily from animove]

they have honeymoon with nkva it drags a lot energy

[Aresye]

Rhaythe, on 21 August 2015 - 06:14 AM, said:

I've played against you guys before, and had some quite close games. This felt like a rough one on you guys. Match score at the end was close, but never felt like you guys got it together. What happened?

As they have something crazy like 500 players, their groups are going to be very mixed bag in terms of playing level.

Also, couldn't help but notice some gems in that last wave such as the Mad Dog w/ 2 ERPPCs and the Arctic Cheetah w/ LRMs and a Flamer.

[Star Wolves Admin Account]

Aresye Kerensky, on 21 August 2015 - 08:34 AM, said:

As they have something crazy like 500 players, their groups are going to be very mixed bag in terms of playing level.

Also, couldn't help but notice some gems in that last wave such as the Mad Dog w/ 2 ERPPCs and the Arctic Cheetah w/ LRMs and a Flamer.

True that we are working on standardizing our builds and skilling up our lower level players at this point but even out of 500+ group of players most of them are on standardish builds and can do around 1000+ damage per game in community warfare.

Honestly I would say that team just didn't have it together that game.

Also, I will not lie that our guys get very nervous fighting BMMU and NS simply because they know how organized and good they are. It is a hump for a lot of our players to get over as many of them get disordered when they see those guys.

But hey, our comp team was destroying 12 mans left and right last night. Closest any of them came in score was 48 to 25.

[Lily from animove]

Rhaythe, on 21 August 2015 - 06:14 AM, said:

I've played against you guys before, and had some quite close games. This felt like a rough one on you guys. Match score at the end was close, but never felt like you guys got it together. What happened?

lol this FoV makes everything look totally ugly whats the setting tryxhard

Edited by Lily from animove, 21 August 2015 - 10:43 AM.

[Rhaythe]

Lily from animove, on 21 August 2015 - 10:43 AM, said:

lol this FoV makes everything look totally ugly whats the setting tryxhard

tryxhard? oooooookay.

It's at 100. I have a large monitor. Anything under 85 looks like I'm staring down a cardboard tube.

[Davers]

Rhaythe, on 21 August 2015 - 11:33 AM, said:

tryxhard? oooooookay.

It's at 100. I have a large monitor. Anything under 85 looks like I'm staring down a cardboard tube.

I wish I had that problem. I have to equip Advanced Zoom so I can see opponents at 700m.

[Deadfire]

I could be mistaken, but having a mixed bag of pilots in clan mechs normally win vs the Inner PugSphere. Toss in that most (if not all) organised units of above average skill levels, have stopped playing CW almost entirely.

[Shell Game]

Blueduck, on 21 August 2015 - 08:44 AM, said:

True that we are working on standardizing our builds and skilling up our lower level players at this point but even out of 500+ group of players most of them are on standardish builds and can do around 1000+ damage per game in community warfare.

Honestly I would say that team just didn't have it together that game.

Also, I will not lie that our guys get very nervous fighting BMMU and NS simply because they know how organized and good they are. It is a hump for a lot of our players to get over as many of them get disordered when they see those guys.

But hey, our comp team was destroying 12 mans left and right last night. Closest any of them came in score was 48 to 25.

The SWOL guys have been improving in CW matches as of late.
I'd honestly rather face a competitive SWOL 12 man, than 12 random pugs any day of the week.
Keep dropping, but lose the Lurms lol.
We do however bring LRM 60 Crabs for CW...HOLD LOCKS PLZ!! o7

[IlKhan Prepaid Kerensky]

Just so everyone has perspective, this is a video that pits 12 people who can communicate perfectly against 4 people who can communicate and 8 people who might as well be deaf. The latter team is somehow better at problem solving, despite having massively inferior options.

Edited by Prepaid Lenin, 25 August 2015 - 05:38 AM.

[Tasker]

Prepaid Lenin, on 25 August 2015 - 05:37 AM, said:

Just so everyone has perspective, this is a video that pits 12 people who can communicate perfectly against 4 people who can communicate and 8 people who might as well be deaf. The latter team is somehow better at problem solving, despite having massively inferior options.

Hmmm... intredasting.