88 replies to this topic

[Mcgral18]

pyrocomp, on 01 October 2015 - 11:17 AM, said:

Sure, had only a single entry in the data. I'm collecting my own data from prolonged matches, but the picture hadn't become clearer yet.

I was doing it in private matches, trying to isolate things.


KMDD causing some weird issues, where having it (and no other change) actually lost you a point.
Consistently.

[pyrocomp]

Mcgral18, on 01 October 2015 - 11:24 AM, said:

I was doing it in private matches, trying to isolate things.


KMDD causing some weird issues, where having it (and no other change) actually lost you a point.
Consistently.

Well, thats strange. Have you checked for hidden things like above average damage or UAV related actions?

[Mcgral18]

pyrocomp, on 01 October 2015 - 11:43 AM, said:

Well, thats strange. Have you checked for hidden things like above average damage or UAV related actions?

Pretty much just what's in the OP.

Killing a UAV is 2 points, UAV detection is 1.
UAV scouting any different than regular scouting? That's 2.

Most misc rewards (flanking, brawling, H&R) seems to be 1 point.


Damage was always a consistent half (death causing confusion in the beginning; 48% damage made no sense because 100 damage -2 from death or -5 from suicide)\

Team damage, we found to be pointless as well. We let someone rack up 200, but nothing changed in his score. -50 we both came to for a Team Kill.


I never got into the LRM or UAV ones, as I rarely use them...slightly selfish.


Testing Counter ECM would be a piece of cake, though. Just walk a Myth Lynx towards ECM, don't target, don't shoot, get the bonus then have the guy kill themselves.

You should only have 2 scores; the win (20) and the Counter ECM (x).

[pyrocomp]

Mcgral18, on 01 October 2015 - 11:55 AM, said:

Pretty much just what's in the OP.

Strange, I used your values and it does not fit. Descripancies are too high. Let's recheck and hope that there are no things like chassis calss dependend values.

[Mcgral18]

pyrocomp, on 01 October 2015 - 11:59 AM, said:

Strange, I used your values and it does not fit. Descripancies are too high. Let's recheck and hope that there are no things like chassis calss dependend values.

You want to post the screenshots?

[pyrocomp]

Mcgral18, on 01 October 2015 - 12:00 PM, said:

You want to post the screenshots?

Thinking about it, but I deleted part of them already. So better just to star accumulating data from the matches again.

[Mcgral18]

Also managed to forget Component Destroyed as I add up a recent match...that was 2.

[Irishtoker]

Thanks to McGral and everyone else for all the info. Been wondering how the match score get calculated.

To SCIENCE!

[Mcgral18]

Irishtoker, on 25 January 2016 - 04:39 PM, said:

Thanks to McGral and everyone else for all the info. Been wondering how the match score get calculated.

To SCIENCE!

Turns out this one is pretty inaccurate, but close enough for the gist of it.