PENDING!!!!!!
#41
Posted 09 July 2012 - 06:54 AM
#42
Posted 09 July 2012 - 07:01 AM
#43
Posted 09 July 2012 - 10:39 AM
Co Starring, on 09 July 2012 - 02:41 AM, said:
Technically, the piscture says:" Soviet RUSSIA".
Not:" Soviet UNION".
Snicker...
(no hard feelings though
P.S. Does your name have anything to do with a band?
lol well technically the correct full name of post 1991 'Russia' as a union of states is the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic but the accepted international legal name recognised by the UN as requested by Boris Yeltsin in 1991 is the Russian Federation (RSFSR) of which Russia, not Soviet Russia, was the most significant part
And no my name has nothing to do with a band, rather a movie
Edited by Dozer, 09 July 2012 - 11:16 AM.
#44
Posted 09 July 2012 - 10:57 AM
Dozer, on 09 July 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:
lol technically the correct full name is the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic but the accepted international legal name recognised by the UN as requested by Boris Yeltsin in 1991 is the Russian Federation (RSFSR) of which Russia, not Soviet Russia, is the most significant part
And no my name has nothing to do with a band, rather a movie
Dunno, Dozer? Dozers? Killdozer? The Matrix?
#46
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:20 AM
Dozer, on 09 July 2012 - 01:21 AM, said:
Pity it's technically incorrect as the Soviet Union no longer exists
Incorrect. Even though the Govt may have 'dissolved', many of the political leaders from the soviet regime stayed in power. Modern Russia is run by the Russian Mafia, the Mafia being little more then a renaming of the KGB.
"The more things change, the more they stay the same."
#47
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:33 AM
Rychard Starheart, on 09 July 2012 - 11:20 AM, said:
Incorrect. Even though the Govt may have 'dissolved', many of the political leaders from the soviet regime stayed in power. Modern Russia is run by the Russian Mafia, the Mafia being little more then a renaming of the KGB.
"The more things change, the more they stay the same."
Don't disagree at all, just pointing out 'technicalities' not cultural realities
Edited by Dozer, 09 July 2012 - 11:38 AM.
#48
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:03 PM
Dozer, on 09 July 2012 - 11:33 AM, said:
Don't disagree at all, just pointing out 'technicalities' not cultural realities
Thats.... lol.... that must me a Russian Joke.
#49
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:11 PM
#50
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:15 PM
Gillopi, on 08 July 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:
You have a chance to get into the beta as well, it is just a very low one. Hence why it is pending. I agree however, that the whole PENDING sign is completely pointless, as you get an email confirmation of it anyway, and the PENDING sign is only good to hurt the feelings of some.
#51
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:28 PM

This is about how every was when they said they were giving away keys and the whole internet was refreshing their website over and over hoping to see "Accepted".
#52
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:24 PM
Gillopi, on 08 July 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:
They've said Founders will get priority, not that Founders will be the only ones getting beta keys in the future. Until then...

(and apparently "Pending" changes to something else once you're accepted, so hey. There IS a reason for it.)
Edited by wanderer, 09 July 2012 - 01:25 PM.
#55
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:45 PM
#56
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:47 PM
#57
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:53 PM
#58
Posted 09 July 2012 - 02:40 PM
#59
Posted 09 July 2012 - 02:49 PM
Gillopi, on 08 July 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:
Not only founders got beta invites bud. Even before founders, their were 10k keys sent out to non-founders.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















