Edited by clownwarlord, 28 October 2015 - 05:51 AM.


A Mech That Will Not Be Doa!
#1
Posted 28 October 2015 - 05:47 AM
#2
Posted 28 October 2015 - 05:56 AM
#3
Posted 28 October 2015 - 05:57 AM
#4
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:01 AM
#6
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:22 AM
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!! *throws cash at PGI*
#7
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:23 AM
#8
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:42 AM

#9
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:45 AM
Man, I miss the MekTek Packs~
#10
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:47 AM
The Mektek version seems a bit better as far as the dish is concerned, but it also looks like the ugly offspring of a Mad Dog and a Black Jack

#12
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:53 AM
Try gettin' real balistics on that thing...
#13
Posted 28 October 2015 - 06:56 AM
627, on 28 October 2015 - 06:53 AM, said:
Try gettin' real balistics on that thing...
I think Riflemans are energy mechs and not ballistics.
Note, stand corrected, arms are energy and ballistics. 2 LLasers and 2 A/C5s (with MLasers torso)
Edited by MeiSooHaityu, 28 October 2015 - 06:57 AM.
#14
Posted 28 October 2015 - 07:06 AM
clownwarlord, on 28 October 2015 - 06:47 AM, said:
Most pilots would wear nothing but their undies and a cooling vest....Clothing on the lady pilots didnt leave much for the imagination when they exited their mech.
#15
Posted 28 October 2015 - 07:14 AM
clownwarlord, on 28 October 2015 - 06:47 AM, said:
That's half of my offensive load out right there. If they can see me sat in the pit they might not want to aim at it.
Like a poor man's ECM.
Edited by Pika, 28 October 2015 - 07:16 AM.
#17
Posted 28 October 2015 - 07:19 AM
Alistair Winter, on 28 October 2015 - 05:57 AM, said:
If only I could equip JJs on my Wubhawk as it's lore for Omnimechs, I'd show you where your god is

(btw a 65 tonner with 4xLPL and JJs: lol speed, lol armor, lol heat)
Plus, the Rifleman IIC is ridiculously ugly compared to:
http://punakettu.dev...atrol-161510611

Edited by Paigan, 28 October 2015 - 07:20 AM.
#18
Posted 28 October 2015 - 07:27 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users