I think it is time to unlink these 2 things.
This way mechs can be made unique with their torso movement. Some mechs lack fast moving torso's because their engines are too small, but those mechs should have quick torso movement.
0
Engine Size Coupling To Torsomovement
Started by Yozzman, Nov 10 2015 06:22 AM
2 replies to this topic
#2
-
-
- Moderate Giver
- 405 posts
Member
Posted 10 November 2015 - 08:50 PM
I can... technically agree. I don't see too much harm in doing such a thing, I have yet to understand the the reason for having it the way it is now. So I'm all for it, unless if there is more to know.
Edited by Livaria, 10 November 2015 - 08:52 PM.
#3
-
-
- The Blood-Eye
- 5,444 posts
Member
- LocationIn the mechbay, telling the techs to put extra LRM ammo on.
Posted 12 November 2015 - 05:35 AM
WOW.. ok.. You got me on this one..
I though to tell you that the idea of making heavier engines affect torso twisting is ridiculous.. but its like that NOW?
As a clanner who doesn't get to change engines.. I HAD NO IDEA.
Wow.. ok.. yeah.. +1.
Definitely...
Torso twisting speed should depend on mech weight and general nimbleness, not engine size..
Some mechs are just more nimble than others, and engine size should not affect this..
I though to tell you that the idea of making heavier engines affect torso twisting is ridiculous.. but its like that NOW?
As a clanner who doesn't get to change engines.. I HAD NO IDEA.
Wow.. ok.. yeah.. +1.
Definitely...
Torso twisting speed should depend on mech weight and general nimbleness, not engine size..
Some mechs are just more nimble than others, and engine size should not affect this..
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
