

#1
Posted 28 November 2015 - 02:39 PM
Blackjack paired
JagerMech 4-6
Yen-lo paired harrasser
I saw a Shadow Cat with 2 UAC2s and 2 ERMLs that did good.
I have had a pair of UAC2s sitting around doing nothing, thought about using them somewhere. Is there any use for AC2s, UAC2s and LBX2s?
#2
Posted 28 November 2015 - 02:43 PM
More heat for less damage than an AC5.
#3
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:02 PM
#4
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:14 PM
#5
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:18 PM
besides that... there is not much reason to take them...
#6
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:24 PM
#7
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:52 PM
They jam way too much to be of any real use.
Lb2x, shotgunning 2x1 damage.. yeah.. lol
Ac2's will be a little better after repass because of heat, but range is still mediocre for its tonnage.
#8
Posted 28 November 2015 - 03:52 PM
Wildstreak, on 28 November 2015 - 02:39 PM, said:

It's actually not that bad of a build. If you can get a good angle on a Heavy or Assault at range with it, he's going to have a bad time. When it doesn't jam, twin UAC/2 is the equivalent of four AC/2 and that's a pretty nasty 11.2 DPS all by itself using vanilla stats. Not too shabby for a mere 10 tons of autocannon plus ammo.
But there's still that "when it doesn't jam" caveat. When it does jam, it's pretty butts. Jam chance is a bit too high on the lighter UACs (2 and 5), though I could definitely see UAC/2 becoming abusive on heavier platforms with too low of a jam chance.
As for the original question, there is no real benefit to taking 2-class auto-cannons. They have great range and that's about it, because it's hard to take advantage of that range when the per-shot damage output is so low. I actually think the nature of 2-class auto-cannons lends itself better to supporting the brawl than it does to sniping.
#9
Posted 28 November 2015 - 04:55 PM
#10
Posted 28 November 2015 - 07:32 PM
When it's time to try hard, it's unfortunately better to just let them collect dust.
#11
Posted 28 November 2015 - 09:47 PM
#12
Posted 28 November 2015 - 10:00 PM
I've run x2 AC2, an ac20 and 2 mpl on my JM6-S for as long as I can remember and it woks fine for the range.
#13
Posted 28 November 2015 - 10:10 PM
627, on 28 November 2015 - 03:18 PM, said:
besides that... there is not much reason to take them...
The only thing 6xac2 achieve is rapid self-melting. More so, such setup is too positioning and team dependent to do anything and still can not afford to stare at anything worse then jaggermech.
What ac2 need is way less heat generation and some fitting profile changes. Without that ac5 are incomparably better in any situation.
#14
Posted 28 November 2015 - 11:47 PM
Lorginir, on 28 November 2015 - 10:10 PM, said:
What ac2 need is way less heat generation and some fitting profile changes. Without that ac5 are incomparably better in any situation.
yea, called lulz build for a reason...
Edited by 627, 28 November 2015 - 11:47 PM.
#15
Posted 29 November 2015 - 12:02 AM
They work best against targets in the open and that can't retrun fire or are engaged. In these cases, AC2s can shred them apart.
So... yeah, they are very situational.
But man, is the BJ-1 super fun.

#16
Posted 29 November 2015 - 12:58 AM
#17
Posted 29 November 2015 - 08:46 AM
I once outgunned a meta timby in solo 1v1, 156 to 50 in a 3AC2 Cent 9-ah build (mining collective conquest center spoke at the very start we both charged solo before teammates got there)....and that build is better than any twolf I routinely beat them down easily....just that instance I had hard stats on a head to head matchup.
I prefer my 2AC2/3SRM2 9-AH 98kph build tho (see top) it is a menace and is getting double buffed for the lols....a fast chainsaw getting the double buff can't wait to hear meta mechs qq more than they already do when they get steamrolled.
but go ahead and say they suck so it gets buffed even more!! is like people complaining about lurms being OP/useless because of the way they use them.
#19
Posted 29 November 2015 - 02:38 PM
Edited by Coolant, 29 November 2015 - 02:38 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users