43 replies to this topic

[Novakaine]

And not 500 re-votes seriously.

[Troutmonkey]

CygnusX7, on 30 November 2015 - 11:36 AM, said:

Make it blind, if you "lose", up the multiplier. We do not need to see whose voting for what.

I need to see what's being voted on. Because if I don't want "Map A" but don't care about any other map, then I need to know which other maps has the highest vote count. So if "Map A" has 20% and "Map B" has 18% and "Map C" has 10%, I know to vote for "Map B" to avoid getting "Map A". I might like "Map C" more, but I might hate "Map A" enough to settle for "Map B"

[Sandpit]

JC Daxion, on 30 November 2015 - 01:41 PM, said:

And now.... sense, I have only played 2 conquest matches, and Have yet to drop on terra.... Must have played 50+ matches.. To me that is total BS

I hate the voting all together,,I'm not getting better matches, like was stated for the reason it was done.. All that's happened is i play skirmish 95% of the time, on basically 3 or 4 maps.. How voting was thought to be a good idea is completely beyond me..
If you want to play a specific map, Go make a private match.. Its really quite simple.

Can you show your map stats? I find your statistics hard to believe.

[Troutmonkey]

TamCoan, on 30 November 2015 - 01:00 PM, said:

I couldn't care less.

FTFY