Hotthedd, on 21 January 2016 - 05:10 AM, said:
I'd rather see IS ACs be burst fire.
Because lasers aren't already superior enough over ACs.
2
Change Cacs?
Started by MauttyKoray, Jan 18 2016 01:53 AM
23 replies to this topic
#21
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 26,888 posts
Member
- LocationThe Keeper of Memes
Posted 21 January 2016 - 11:33 AM
Because lasers aren't already superior enough over ACs.
#22
-
-
- The People's Hero
- 3,213 posts
Member
- LocationDixie
Posted 21 January 2016 - 12:25 PM
FupDup, on 21 January 2016 - 11:33 AM, said:
Because lasers aren't already superior enough over ACs.
That isn't the reason. Lasers need longer burn times, especially pulses.
The reason is PPFLD, and PGI's decision not to do anything about it.
#23
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 26,888 posts
Member
- LocationThe Keeper of Memes
Posted 21 January 2016 - 12:28 PM
Hotthedd, on 21 January 2016 - 12:25 PM, said:
That isn't the reason. Lasers need longer burn times, especially pulses.
The reason is PPFLD, and PGI's decision not to do anything about it.
The reason is PPFLD, and PGI's decision not to do anything about it.
Most beam durations are in a decent spot, with some actually being too long (Clan ERLL and sorta IS ERLL).
Lasers aren't PPFLD though. They're DoT.
Edited by FupDup, 21 January 2016 - 12:28 PM.
#24
-
-
- The People's Hero
- 3,213 posts
Member
- LocationDixie
Posted 21 January 2016 - 12:31 PM
FupDup, on 21 January 2016 - 12:28 PM, said:
Most beam durations are in a decent spot, with some actually being too long (Clan ERLL and sorta IS ERLL).
Lasers aren't PPFLD though. They're DoT.
Lasers aren't PPFLD though. They're DoT.
The reason I would be for burst fire ACs is PPFLD. Sorry for the confusion.
As far as laser duration, increasing it would hopefully cut down on the laser vomit, or at least give it a small downside.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
