

The Warhammer: 1 Week In. What Builds Have You Settled Into?
#41
Posted 26 January 2016 - 01:57 PM
7s 3x SRM 6+A , 6 mlas
Both work for me.
#42
Posted 26 January 2016 - 02:19 PM
BW 3 ERLL 1 Guass
My favs atm
#43
Posted 26 January 2016 - 03:47 PM
2xPPCs, 2xLL, 4xMGs, 1xSRM6.
Super fun for me. Tried the meta builds for the tourney and hated every minute of it. Went back to the PPC config and found the game inmensely fun again.
#44
Posted 26 January 2016 - 04:41 PM
Arctourus, on 25 January 2016 - 06:47 PM, said:
My 6r has a ppc in each arm, four mplas in the torso and a pair of machine guns. Wanted to run missiles, but I like to have the left arm ppc and the right arm ppc each on their own group, so I was running out of mouse buttons.
6d runs a ppc in each arm, a lplas in the right torso and three mlas in the left torso
7s is running a bit different....an erllas in each arm, four mlas in the torsos and three lrm 5s. Makes for a little variety.
great, great mech.
I usually group the MGs with my SRMs. On my widow maker I tie the MPl, SRMs and MGs all in one. Ranges are close enough.
MechWarrior5152251, on 25 January 2016 - 07:42 PM, said:
seen plenty of Black KNights do even better. If I wanna vomit, that or the Hopper do it better, IMO.
Stefka Kerensky, on 25 January 2016 - 08:10 PM, said:
After trying a little of BT TT taste, I screw it, because (as we know) MWO has nothing to do with.
So I ended with these:
Black Widow 2uac5/2ac5 (because 4ac5 was to predictible)
R6: 2LPL/2UAC5 super cool in every map
6D: I would like 3LPL/4ml.... but max engine and 2LPL/5mpl is just too lol I cannot stop pilot it, even though it's hot.
7S: still unbasiced, but I'm tempted by 3srm4+6ml......let's see once mastered my beloved Natasha WHM....
o/
*unfriended*

Tarogato, on 25 January 2016 - 08:26 PM, said:
small lasers add heat, don't have the same range as tags, and don't help friendly lrm carriers. And 1 DHS ain't enough difference to get excited about.
Narcissistic Martyr, on 25 January 2016 - 08:34 PM, said:
6D has XL340, 2PPC, AMS, and 7ML. had 3 tons and one slot left so I threw a command console in it too. I'd rather have more engine but PGI says no... 5/8 heavy mechs belong to the clans only.
7S has 3ASRM6+3 tons and 2PPC and of course AMS.
While I could shove 4ML on instead of artemis and an extra heat sink, I'd rather my SRMs actually hit what I'm aiming at and within the minimum range the ASRM6s hit for nearly 40 damage albeit spread out so it works well enough.
My 6R is running either a STD 280, 2PPC+4MPL and AMS or dual AC20 and a STD270 as an occaisional but quite decent joke build. To be honest, I'd rather be running an XL280, 2PPC, and a pair of UAC5s. Unfortunately buying clan xL engines for MY IICs left me space poor.
Widowmaker. I don't have it yet. Too many clients backed out of their upgrade contracts due to the recent stock market crisis and my business went under. So, I'm back to being IRL poor. Doesn't matter though, I'm not staying down for long and the widowmaker will be a sweet thing to look forward to for when I'm back on top.
Except they don't work as 0 heat aiming sights to make sure his PPCs don't hit the ground.
try it with 4x aSRM4 and 4xSLasers. You'll get way better ammo consumption and your damage will be lower from the missiles, but way more focused. Just a thought, though.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 26 January 2016 - 04:39 PM.
#45
Posted 26 January 2016 - 04:45 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 26 January 2016 - 04:38 PM, said:
seen plenty of Black KNights do even better. If I wanna vomit, that or the Hopper do it better, IMO.
*unfriended*

lol
you know that I really would like mwo to be much more BT-ish....
In fact, it has quite nothing to do with our beloved TT

I admire you for your efforts about that!
Anyway, just mastered Nat WHM, and choosing an extreme built (2ac5/2uac5) made me feel like Natasha, an extreme pilot.
It's kinda effective too, in 26 matches, w/l ratio= 3.33 k/d ratio=2.54 (50% solo dropping)
#46
Posted 26 January 2016 - 04:59 PM
Escef, on 26 January 2016 - 06:53 AM, said:
My Widow is 325XL, 4xLPL, 4xMG; it's a giant, non-jumping Ember.

The 6R[S] Ive got the stock 280 standard engine, 2xLPL, 4xML, 1xLRM10. I haven't tried the build I put on my non-[S] 6R yet (300XL, 2xPPC, 2xAC5).
The 6D I'm running with a 300 standard, 3xLL, 4xSPL, and 2xSL.
*also unfriended....*


Escef, on 26 January 2016 - 07:26 AM, said:
Honestly, I could see 1 or 2 flamers as an in-your-face distraction. Firing them unexpectedly would definitely buy you a second or two of confusion. Doubt it will work much once you hit tier 3.
i forget the exact build, but I had a flamer on one of my Cicadas for that exact reason...can't tell you the number of times that a flamer to the other guys cockpit got me outta a jam.
DjPush, on 26 January 2016 - 08:18 AM, said:
My work here is done....








not sure what's more eye searing...your builds or your paintjobs.......
*twitches, convulses.... runs off to look for anti seizure meds*
#48
Posted 26 January 2016 - 05:11 PM
Stefka Kerensky, on 26 January 2016 - 04:45 PM, said:
you know that I really would like mwo to be much more BT-ish....
In fact, it has quite nothing to do with our beloved TT

I admire you for your efforts about that!
Anyway, just mastered Nat WHM, and choosing an extreme built (2ac5/2uac5) made me feel like Natasha, an extreme pilot.
It's kinda effective too, in 26 matches, w/l ratio= 3.33 k/d ratio=2.54 (50% solo dropping)
nahnahnhanah can't hear you
#49
Posted 26 January 2016 - 06:34 PM
6D - 300 STD, AMS, 2 PPC's, 4 ML's. Nothing special, but it gets the job done. And besides I needed to honor the old war beast with its true arms. Even though I never knew it growing up, it still feels right.
6R - XL300, because I die fast enough anyways, being the player that I am, so I might as well have fun doing it. 2 UAC5's, 6ML's, AMS, SRM6
6R(S) - STD300 (I know you'll hate me for this, sorry Bishop) AC20, 4ML's, SRM6, AMS
7S - XL340 (had one kicking around) 3 x LRM5, 2 LL, 4 ML, AMS, BAP , something to reign a little trouble on but enough speed to keep me at distance until I absolutely need to close the gap
BW - XL300 - 2 x PPC's, 4MG's, SRM6 and heatsinks taking up every other slot
So far, thats what I have settled on, not sure if I'll keep it for the long haul, I do like to play Lego Mechs and change stuff out occasionally to see how it works.
-ST
#50
Posted 26 January 2016 - 08:14 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 26 January 2016 - 05:11 PM, said:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand also the 6R is gone!
the 2uac5+2LPL built gave me w/l ratio=3.80 and k/d ratio=3.36 in 24 matches.
One of the fastest mech to master.
Bish, sorry if I provoke you, but it's not my fault. It's simply PGI fault for their crazy, anti-TT, (anti-clan?) weapon/efficiency balance.
#51
Posted 26 January 2016 - 08:20 PM
Yeah, I know that makes me a bit of a TT heretic despite my playing since 1986.
Edited by shaterbane, 26 January 2016 - 08:24 PM.
#52
Posted 27 January 2016 - 05:26 AM
shaterbane, on 26 January 2016 - 08:20 PM, said:
Yeah, I know that makes me a bit of a TT heretic despite my playing since 1986.
despite my playing since 1986
despite my playing since 1986
despite my playing since 1986!!!!!
Seriously,

that will be all.
#54
Posted 27 January 2016 - 08:30 AM
shaterbane, on 26 January 2016 - 08:20 PM, said:
Yeah, I know that makes me a bit of a TT heretic despite my playing since 1986.
love it
I'm not playing TT here, so I don't stick to TT builds. I go with builds that work for me in MWO. Most stock builds simply aren't going to have the damage output to keep up with modified mechs. Same reason GMs kept munch tech and builds out of their games and just about every GM out there had build rules.
We don't have that stopgap here though, so I tend to build mechs that are going to fit my style. I've used lasers for years now, both pulse and regular, they've always done me well, so I tend to build around that usually.
#55
Posted 27 January 2016 - 08:44 AM
6R: std 300, 2ERL in torsos and 2LPL in arms (at least I put something in the arms!).
6D: std 325. 4ML in torsos and 4MPL in arms (see above).
7S: XL300 (I think) 3LRM10s, a bunch of MLs, TAG, BAP and AMS.
Yes I am ashamed of my PPC heresy. Yes I go back to Battledroids and original Battletech (and still have ALL of my materials) and so my shame is even deeper as I wanted the Hammer in this game AS a hammer was meant to be.
Nevertheless, these builds are really quite fun and even effective for me (I just can't seem to hit anything with PPCs)!
#57
Posted 27 January 2016 - 09:56 AM
7S is 280std 6MPL, 3SRM6. Endo Steel. Again, the seismic allows you to really set great ambushes for that insane close range firepower. Also has range module for MPL and cool down for STM6.
#58
Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:04 AM
#59
Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:04 AM
In terms of the variants and loadouts, I dont like how its locked into PPCs with its quirks.
#60
Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:23 AM
Sadly I didn't keep the signature PPC arms as they were constantly shooting the hills and using the torso slots were just way saver.
Black Widdow:
2x Gauss (6t ammo), 4x ML, XL280,
had a lot of 4-6 kill and 700-1000dmg games before friday.
had a lot of early deaths on the weekend because of gauss explosions and XL engine...

Collectors 6R i first tried 2X (er)PPC (arms) and 4x ML, Std280-300 engine, but I swapped the PPCs to the torso while playing mostly Polar after patch with better performance, still not quite happy.
At the end of the weekend event I switched to:
2x PPC, 2x AC5, 2x ML in the torso. Some interesting games, but not very heat efficient. Far from stock, but at least the guns looked as nice as the robotec images ;P
Used the 7S with 2x LRM15A, 4x ML and Tag, std 280 engine, together with my buddies (using MadDogs) before the weekend. Didn't try on weekend.
For the 6D I tried the 6x ML 2x LP on a Std 280 engine or something.
This was OK, but still not as much fun as the ballistic/ppc builds.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users