


Clan Laser Ams
#1
Posted 31 January 2016 - 11:02 AM

#2
Posted 31 January 2016 - 01:30 PM
http://www.sarna.net...-Missile_System
Important side-note:
Your screenshot is from MW4 where we played as House Davion, so these should be available for Inner Sphere too.
Edited by Generic Internetter, 31 January 2016 - 01:31 PM.
#3
Posted 31 January 2016 - 01:32 PM
#4
Posted 31 January 2016 - 01:46 PM
Void Angel, on 31 January 2016 - 01:32 PM, said:
What a pointless and unproductive comment.
That's just a matter of your personal taste. Maybe I want to save a ton on ammo by sacrificing heat control.
It's a trade-off. All mechlab tradeoff options like this are a good thing, as long as PGI balances them.
#5
Posted 31 January 2016 - 01:49 PM
Generic Internetter, on 31 January 2016 - 01:30 PM, said:
http://www.sarna.net...-Missile_System
Important side-note:
Your screenshot is from MW4 where we played as House Davion, so these should be available for Inner Sphere too.
I would be okay with IS being able to use the LAMS as long as they are balanced with the Tabletop values of 5 heat points for Clan, 7 for Inner Sphere. And don't give IS some LAMS quirk, that'd be way cheap.
Edited by Ethak, 31 January 2016 - 01:49 PM.
#6
Posted 31 January 2016 - 02:36 PM
Generic Internetter, on 31 January 2016 - 01:46 PM, said:
What a pointless and unproductive comment.
That's just a matter of your personal taste. Maybe I want to save a ton on ammo by sacrificing heat control.
It's a trade-off. All mechlab tradeoff options like this are a good thing, as long as PGI balances them.
No need to get all rectally injured - sometimes people put smilies in their posts to indicate they're teasing you.
Edit: Sarna references sourcbooks released after I stopped buying books; originally, the LAMS was released in the Tactical Handbook in 1994, and listed the LAMS as Level 3 Rules for 3055 - and only for the Inner Sphere at that time.
Edited by Void Angel, 31 January 2016 - 02:48 PM.
#7
Posted 31 January 2016 - 02:57 PM
Void Angel, on 31 January 2016 - 02:36 PM, said:
Edit: Sarna references sourcbooks released after I stopped buying books; originally, the LAMS was released in the Tactical Handbook in 1994, and listed the LAMS as Level 3 Rules for 3055 - and only for the Inner Sphere at that time.
Researched first by Clan Wolf in 3045, (in production by 3048) . MWO takes place at least in 3049. So yes, they are available.
Edited by Ethak, 31 January 2016 - 02:57 PM.
#8
Posted 31 January 2016 - 03:13 PM
In any case, you're not saving any tonnage unless you're using multiple tons of ammunition - laser AMS systems for both Clans and Inner Sphere cost 1.5 tons.
Also, wanting the Clan version to be outright superior doesn't fit well with MWO design.
#10
Posted 31 January 2016 - 04:37 PM
They can even use the same hardpoint.
Really now. It's what, 3052? Edging on 3053?
We should have it by now. :/
Void Angel, on 31 January 2016 - 03:13 PM, said:
In any case, you're not saving any tonnage unless you're using multiple tons of ammunition - laser AMS systems for both Clans and Inner Sphere cost 1.5 tons.
Also, wanting the Clan version to be outright superior doesn't fit well with MWO design.
Since when does LAMS have any kind of "lore" weight? AFAIK 1: Sarna doesn't list a weight and 2: It's a weaker small pulse laser.
At MOST it should weight 1 ton (same as SPL). I'd be fine with 0.5 tons, because while it doesn't use any ammunition, it generates heat. So instead of ammo, you'll be putting on heatsinks. (Which weight 1 ton each)
Edited by Night Thastus, 31 January 2016 - 04:38 PM.
#12
Posted 31 January 2016 - 05:32 PM
Night Thastus, on 31 January 2016 - 04:37 PM, said:
They can even use the same hardpoint.
Really now. It's what, 3052? Edging on 3053?
We should have it by now. :/
Since when does LAMS have any kind of "lore" weight? AFAIK 1: Sarna doesn't list a weight and 2: It's a weaker small pulse laser.
...Since its inception. I'm not quoting Sarna, bud. I'm reading the rulebooks - which is where all tonnage values for MWO have been derived, so it's not unreasonable to expect that practice to continue. Asking for a half-ton system is just greedy - the heat sinks you're using "instead" of ammo coincidentally work for your guns, too. It's not equivalent.
[redacted]
Edited by Odanan, 01 February 2016 - 04:19 AM.
Unconstructive/Flaming/Bashing
#13
Posted 31 January 2016 - 06:17 PM
#14
Posted 01 February 2016 - 08:44 AM
Ethak, on 31 January 2016 - 04:54 PM, said:
The games in general have shifted away from the lore every chance they get. They can't be used as a baseline for anything when all their values are made up.
Void Angel, on 31 January 2016 - 05:32 PM, said:
[redacted]
I suppose it depends on how much heat they generate. If they generate only a small amount of heat, 1.5 tons might be fine. But if they generate a ton? Let's have it be 0.5
Frankly, 1 ton is fine. Regular AMS is 0.5 tons (same as the MG it's based on) and thus laser AMS should be 1 tons (same as the SPL it's based on).
It just depends on how they balance it, I guess. I hope it doesn't end up some pile of **** system that barely does more than regular AMS while generating a ton of heat and weighing 1.5 tons. That would completely negate the point of it existing in the first place. It's got to have *some* advantage and *some* tradeoff somewhere.
#15
Posted 02 February 2016 - 03:59 AM
#16
Posted 02 February 2016 - 04:48 AM
Sean Freyason, on 02 February 2016 - 03:59 AM, said:
You can actually shut down AMS or ECM now, so that comment is null, brutha'
#17
Posted 02 February 2016 - 06:27 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users