Would want to get my hands on a Marauder IIC (3R) version
Assuming Clan tech it would probably have 87 speed post speed tweak and 28 spare tons at full armor like and EBJ
No Quirks in exchange of having:
3x CUAC 5 instead of 2 UAC 5 (which is better than any other ballistic combination the chassis can carry)
And 4 CERSL instead of 4 ML
All in all superior damage and mobility at the cost of slightly less structure, it doesn't have heat problems on this build either way
1
Do All Mechs Have Iic Counterparts?
Started by DovisKhan, Feb 09 2016 03:16 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:16 AM
#2
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:21 AM
To answer the title, no they don't. Most IIC mechs are mechs the Clans took with them when they left the Inner Sphere and later upgraded.
#3
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:24 AM
Your IIC Wouldn't also necessarily have the same hardpoint layout. It's a pleasant daydream, but unlikely.
#4
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:26 AM
Ah, thanks, well at least i found that http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Marauder, there actually was a Marauder 3R (C) variant, wih clan weaponry, hope that gets introduced, could have been introduced as a 15 EUR add on like the Hero variant :/
Also the MAD-9W2 variant that's ECM capable, wish they had a standard 3x mech + hero + 2 reinforcement pack for the MAD
Also the MAD-9W2 variant that's ECM capable, wish they had a standard 3x mech + hero + 2 reinforcement pack for the MAD
Edited by DovisKhan, 09 February 2016 - 03:30 AM.
#5
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:34 AM
While the vast majority of IS battlemechs do not have a IIC version, there is actually a Marauder IIC. Its 85 tons though, and the base model is all energy weapons (3xERPPC, 2xMPL, 4xERSL)
Heres a full list of IIC mechs:
Heres a full list of IIC mechs:
- Beowulf IIC
- Clint IIC
- Commando IIC
- Conjurer (Hellhound), confirmed to be the Wolverine IIC in all but name; five tons lighter than the originalWolverine
- Dervish IIC (apocryphal)
- Griffin IIC, fifteen tons lighter than the original Griffin
- Guillotine IIC
- Highlander IIC
- Hunchback IIC
- Jenner IIC
- Locust IIC, five tons heavier than the original Locust
- Marauder IIC, ten tons heavier than the original Marauder and thus classed as an assault 'Mech, not a heavy 'Mech
- Orion IIC
- Ostscout IIC (prototypes only; project cancelled before entering production)
- Phoenix Hawk IIC, thirty-five tons heavier than the original Phoenix Hawk and thus classed as an assault 'Mech, not a medium 'Mech
- Rifleman IIC, five tons heavier than the original Rifleman
- Shadow Hawk IIC, ten tons lighter than the original Shadow Hawk
- Stinger IIC
- Thunderbolt IIC
- UrbanMech IIC
- Warhammer IIC, ten tons heavier than the original Warhammer and thus classed as an assault 'Mech, not a heavy 'Mech
- Wolfhound IIC, a rebuild of Phelan Kell's personal 'Mech and presumably a unique one-off design
- Wyvern IIC
#6
Posted 09 February 2016 - 03:36 AM
Thanks for info!
#7
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:18 AM
Only one IIC mech i'm interested in and thats the Urbanmech IIC
#8
Posted 09 February 2016 - 04:29 AM
Samial, on 09 February 2016 - 04:18 AM, said:
Only one IIC mech i'm interested in and thats the Urbanmech IIC
Tried the regular urbanmechs since it's their sale now, heh, and to my regret i bought 2 off em before testing
1st game in stock loadout, lol, even the assaults left me in the dust, how god awful slow it was, I didn't even make it to the battle before my team wiped everyone out, way to make one feel useless.
2nd try, I bought a decent engine, I start walking... I still walk slower than in my MAD DOG and turn slower.... and that's with a light mech
Seriously, I loved the urban mech aesthetically and I liked that it's ballistic friendly, but the twist speed... the walk speed... I get that it should have something to make it feel distinct, i could deal with having 40km/h move speed as long as the torso twist would be appropriately fast, now you can turn in any other light mech much faster.
If the IIC variant would rectify twist speed issues - i'd be totally for buying that
Edited by DovisKhan, 09 February 2016 - 04:30 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users