34 replies to this topic

[Alex Morgaine]

Don't forget your shot glasses

[S 0 L E N Y A]

I say we go backwards, give me LAMs!!!! Or a Marauder II.

But, within the guidelines of the OP, I would love to see the Fafnir above all else.
It would fit in with MWO very well, as its primary armament is two high mounted ballistics. It also uses ECM.
There are more than enough lore variants to make a pack out of as well, and of course PGI could easily come up with their own versions.

For a clan fatty Id say Deimos would be awesome. Technically mid 3060's. It is an omni, so lots of variants. Again, high mounted weapon points.

Seeing the early IS Omnis would be neat too.

[CK16]

Fafnir would require them to create Heavy Gauss, though...

On that note as well wish they would fix Gauss to be instant like in the previous games :/ They feel so MEH in the current MWO scheme :/

[STEF_]

CK16, on 17 February 2016 - 11:59 AM, said:

The big goal here is add mechs people would want that would give us what we want and provide PGI with healthy profit off this, while not breaking the game!

Thanks

I want content.
(see mw2/mw3/mw4 for what I'm talking about)

[Y E O N N E]

IS Omni Pack:

Light: Raptor
Medium: Blackjack-Omni
Heavy: Avatar
Assault: Sunder

Reverse-Engineering Duo:

Heavy: Rakshasa
Heavy: Blackhawk-KU

[TheArisen]

As part of a pack or not, the Nightstar. #PlzPgi

[CK16]

This is good guys! I am putting almost every request into a spreadsheet that I can share later but i need more votes and mechs.

I am tallying both so even if repeat put it up please

[Navid A1]

cazidin, on 17 February 2016 - 02:35 PM, said:

Personally, I don't understand why anyone would want another slow 100 ton mech. 32.4 KPH? That's slower than the Dire Wolf and, if you're lucky, you'd get a comparable armament.

Light: Piranha
Medium: Bushwhacker
Heavy: Another one? So soon? Maybe Crusader
Assault: Imp or Charger

There is a thing called mechlab... in which you can install larger engines.


You're welcome.!

[Armorine]

this is going to be a short post as im short on time right now but ive said it before but id love to 1 heavy mech in particular

the penetrator. weighing in at 75 tons(the sweet spot) this mech is a beast and prominently featured in lore. with plenty of options for hero mechs and standard models. base comes with 2 larges lasers and 6 mediums pulse lasers plus JJs. later models mount missiles and ecm. this is my number one pick for future inclusion into mwo.



P.S unseen longbow, Stone rhino/behemoth.

Edited by Armorine, 17 February 2016 - 09:12 PM.

[TheArisen]

Armorine, on 17 February 2016 - 09:11 PM, said:

this is going to be a short post as im short on time right now but ive said it before but id love to 1 heavy mech in particular

the penetrator. weighing in at 75 tons(the sweet spot) this mech is a beast and prominently featured in lore. with plenty of options for hero mechs and standard models. base comes with 2 larges lasers and 6 mediums pulse lasers plus JJs. later models mount missiles and ecm. this is my number one pick for future inclusion into mwo.



P.S unseen longbow, Stone rhino/behemoth.

Light: Javelin
Medium: Assassin
Heavy: Penetrator
Assault: Nightstar

[Imperius]

Mad Cat MK II

[Deathswarrior]

Bushwhacker

[MrJeffers]

Sandpit, on 17 February 2016 - 12:10 PM, said:

The timelines was removed (past tense) years ago. There is no timeline. In order to have a timeline you must have a system of advancement. The timeline is simply a marketing tool to control what tech levels are allowed into the game.

It's not an opinion, it's a factual statement. It's not an endorsement nor is it a complaint, merely a statement of truth.

There is absolutely no sync between the "timeline" for adding new mechs and the "timeline" for the CW section. There's not a single time, date, or other chronological item I can find anywhere on the website to even give a current date.

Russ even stated on twitter that there's no timeline.

If you have a mech you'd like to see implemented, discuss it, but lets' not think that the "timeline" has anything to do with that other than what I listed above and forget about using it as an excuse to prevent the implementation of certain mechs

You didn't look very hard then:
https://mwomercs.com/clock

Not to mention the tutorial video clearly calls out the time as 3051.

But as the OP mentioned, it's the technology, not the timeline that is the criteria for mech selection, not year. Anything that requires new weapons or new systems isn't going to happen currently.

Edited by MrJeffers, 19 February 2016 - 10:44 AM.

[JudgeDeathCZ]

Sandpit, on 17 February 2016 - 12:10 PM, said:

The timelines was removed (past tense) years ago. There is no timeline. In order to have a timeline you must have a system of advancement. The timeline is simply a marketing tool to control what tech levels are allowed into the game.

It's not an opinion, it's a factual statement. It's not an endorsement nor is it a complaint, merely a statement of truth.

There is absolutely no sync between the "timeline" for adding new mechs and the "timeline" for the CW section. There's not a single time, date, or other chronological item I can find anywhere on the website to even give a current date.

Russ even stated on twitter that there's no timeline.

If you have a mech you'd like to see implemented, discuss it, but lets' not think that the "timeline" has anything to do with that other than what I listed above and forget about using it as an excuse to prevent the implementation of certain mechs

then it will be nice to have some weapons this game realy need...mainly light autocannons and gauss and micro lasers for lighter mechs

[Dr Hobo]

Flea,Owens,Bushwacker,Uziel.

Urbanmech 2C,Blood Asp,Cougar for clams.


As much as I would love to see other modules and weapons,with the way convergence works,I just don't see the point in adding more weapons(as badly as they are needed) simply because we already have a helluva time with the lovely extreme pin point alpha strikes.