

Lbx
#1
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:48 PM
#2
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:50 PM
#3
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:52 PM
#4
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:52 PM
Malachy Karrde, on 19 February 2016 - 08:48 PM, said:
He was probably just finishing off heavily wounded enemies. People can do that far more effectively with a couple of Large Pulse Lasers. Since the LBX damage spreads, doing big numbers is not as impressive as it appears.
Some mechs, such as the Legend Killer and the Cent-D, are heavily quirked with LB10X. That makes the weapon... passable. Fun to shoot though.
Edited by El Bandito, 19 February 2016 - 08:54 PM.
#5
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:53 PM
#6
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:56 PM
#7
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:57 PM
Malachy Karrde, on 19 February 2016 - 08:48 PM, said:
Any weapon that gets little use and then someone uses it kicks butt then it gets nerf again
It’s the cycle of MWO
imho
#8
Posted 19 February 2016 - 08:57 PM
LBX is trash compared to any other AC. They need to fix it soon, before the KDK comes out, because most spirit bears will be using an LBX, so they can fire and twist like an atlas, and they'll get a deluge of complaints then.
#9
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:03 PM
El Bandito, on 19 February 2016 - 08:52 PM, said:
He was probably just finishing off heavily wounded enemies. People can do that far more effectively with a couple of Large Pulse Lasers. Since the LBX damage spreads, doing big numbers is not as impressive as it appears.
Some mechs, such as the Legend Killer and the Cent-D, are heavily quirked with LB10X. That makes the weapon... passable. Fun to shoot though.
#10
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:08 PM
Malachy Karrde, on 19 February 2016 - 09:03 PM, said:
No way an LBX5 boating Dire Wolf can kill an enemy as fast as a UAC5 boating Dire Wolf, unless the UAC5s jam badly. I used both configs on my Dire Wolves and the LBX version was decidedly inferior.
Sure, against fast moving Lights, the front loaded damage of LBX5 might be better, but I did not bring the slowest 100 tonner in the game to focus on Lights.
Edited by El Bandito, 19 February 2016 - 09:17 PM.
#11
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:11 PM

#12
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:48 PM
#13
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:52 PM
#14
Posted 19 February 2016 - 09:55 PM
Malachy Karrde, on 19 February 2016 - 08:48 PM, said:
One of my best Assaults is a dual LB10X Banshee. The trick is that it's extremely situational and you have to be patient. I don't know about the Clan range and spread on these things, but the LB20X doesn't feel great when it hits.
But it IS a shotgun, and to properly use a shotgun, you have to close. And if people already have exposed parts, they're going to die fast.
#15
Posted 19 February 2016 - 10:31 PM
#16
Posted 19 February 2016 - 11:01 PM
Malachy Karrde, on 19 February 2016 - 08:56 PM, said:
It's not how much damage you do, but how much damage you do to a killing location that matters in the end.
Spraying people across the full body isn't nearly as effective as the same damage-range AC firing solid shots into the same location. Same reason LRMs are a third-class weapon vs. direct fire weaponry. It takes more damage inflicted via spread to equal a lesser amount of direct damage.
#17
Posted 20 February 2016 - 05:32 AM
Only thing I run LBX in now are mechs with superquirks for it like the CN9-D and ON1-M. Both of which can be lolz to run.
#18
Posted 20 February 2016 - 05:43 AM
higher pellet count
spread
tweak those and they might be more desirable. the spread needs to be about the size of a large light mech or small medium mech at the weapon's optimal range for its class. the pellet count needs to come up especially for the smaller guns, 2 pellets is kind of lame. the lb2 needs at least 8, and the lb5 gets doubled to 10 pellets, then maybe 15 and 25 for the 10 and 20. would also swing for 6,8,10,20 pellets if the spread was made nonlinear so that a majority of the pellets land closer to the center line.
Edited by LordNothing, 20 February 2016 - 05:51 AM.
#19
Posted 20 February 2016 - 05:46 AM
#20
Posted 20 February 2016 - 05:56 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users