Warspawn, on 14 April 2016 - 04:15 PM, said:
Just a quick question here...
Why do peeps think the Shadowhawk is less survivable vs. the Hunchie? The SH's vertical move ability makes me grin. Hunchie goes 'ouch' and dies....
Overall health. After quirks you get significantly more from the Hunchback.
Hitboxes. Equalsize front/rear on an SHK means 12 or more rear armor is optimal while a hunch can get away with 2 rear on its right side, get surrounded and still have some right rear armor after getting 4 kills and then running at 72 kph (personal experience).
The size difference of a tiny Hunchback compared to the tallest 55..60..65...almost tallest 70 tonner, taller than 80 tonners. (What I am saying is the SHK is THAT tall.)
Twist ability, SHK has the most limited twist radius while hbk sports a twist radius so good you can shoot behind you.
No vertical blindspot on an hbk, Shadowhawks can have someone stand right in front and Mechs under 11 meters cannot be seen or even aimed at with torso weaponry.
Also if you want vertical ability in a 55 tonner, the Shadowhawk's has the worst performance for 3 JJ, and any other jj-equipped 55 ton mech gets a limit of 7.
Don't get me wrong, Shadowhawks are pretty good in anyone's hands, but they are average. It doesn't excel at anything and it doesnt have much room to improve. It simply is.
Shadowhawks wouldn't take the abuse Hunch does against this Jagermech. Keep in mind this is without quirks and 2 right rear and some 16 left rear armor and I literally give this guy my back as a defense.
Https://youtu.be/utOOCH_J1rQ
Edited by Koniving, 14 April 2016 - 04:48 PM.