So. Is there really any reason why you should need two players with premium time for private matches? The other day I wanted to do some 1v1s with a friend who I was trying to get into the game, but since he was new he didn't have any premium time and he didn't want to spend money on any since he didn't know if it was gonna be worth it. My proposition is simple. Remove the pay-wall for private matches as there is really no reason for it to be there. Also CW maps in private matches plz.
0
Private Matches Without Premium Time
Started by GLaDOSauR, Apr 28 2016 08:31 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 142 posts
Member
- LocationEating your cake while you're not looking.
Posted 28 April 2016 - 08:31 AM
#2
-
-
- The Privateer
- 2,688 posts
Member
Posted 28 April 2016 - 09:03 AM
I am sure that PGI's justification for making private matches Pay to Play is that they have to provide the server space to host those matches.
#3
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 142 posts
Member
- LocationEating your cake while you're not looking.
Posted 28 April 2016 - 09:14 AM
Rampage, on 28 April 2016 - 09:03 AM, said:
I am sure that PGI's justification for making private matches Pay to Play is that they have to provide the server space to host those matches.
Ah! That makes sense. Ok. I'd still like to be able to do 1v1's with other casuals tho...
#4
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 130 posts
Member
Posted 28 April 2016 - 09:39 AM
But they let people play the real game, in real matches, for C-Bills and XP for free?
Why would a tiny, featureless map with 2 people take so many resources that it's unfeasible?
If it's really a problem, they could have one player host the match locally. It's not THAT complicated or resource intensive.
Why would a tiny, featureless map with 2 people take so many resources that it's unfeasible?
If it's really a problem, they could have one player host the match locally. It's not THAT complicated or resource intensive.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
