The armor on either side is a bit intrusive, however I'm often glad it's there. It's rare that anyone has the brains to, but the cockpit in the center window is really easy to hit otherwise. I use my battlegrid and audio for situational awareness.
---
Of random interest, people keep saying "Go IS! It's better."
Remember that PGI doesn't quirk mechs that are impressive as it is, and goes negative on mechs that are far too impressive.
There's a reason the Highlander IIC isn't quirked.
Side note: Current hitbox comparison.

,
From the few Highlander IICs I've played, they are on par to slightly superior.
I mimicked my 733 missile boat in the HGN-IIC B with modest results; only issue is the occasional jam on the UAC/2 (and I'm still using a standard engine because I can't afford an XL at the moment). Once I get that fixed it'll be up to speed but even slow it does well against softened enemies.
The Highlander IIC-C also did REALLY good as an upgraded Brawllander with twin UAC/10s instead of UAC/5s. Jam rate's still a bit of an issue but for the damage output it's doing superbly.
Interestingly, it was awful as a mimick to my Heavy Metal (which is my best Highlander build). I believe the reason is that unlike the Heavy Metal where all the direct fire weapons are on the arms and the streaks are on the torso (and can target/hit what I fire at with the arms), the lasers for the IIC-C are on the torso and as such lose the ability to use those lasers when arm-aiming, severely hurting the mech's potential to imitate the Heavy Metal.
Those are the only ones I have thus far.
When I get the A, it will imitate my 733P Highlander.
And finally the prime looks like it'll be whatever a Highlander 732 could be.
Edited by Koniving, 16 May 2016 - 08:23 AM.