Jump to content

Bt Vs Rt Debate


14 replies to this topic

#1 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 03 June 2016 - 08:37 PM

Alright before I get down to the heart of it let me explain the reason behind this;
My gaming group was in the park yesterday talking about the old FASA & HG law suite and it turned into a Vs. debate.

So I figured what the hell lets ask for other opinions.

What we have for the Vs on each, only the most notable warriors in both Sagas and only their BT/RT counterparts for mechs are used.

Feel free to exclude some of the other units if you wish.

The units for both side:
Battletech:
Mechs:
All Variants
IS:
Rifleman
War Hammer
Archer
Marauder
Long Bow
Locust
Stinger
Wasp
Crusader
Phoenix Hawk
Valkyrie

Clan:
War Hammer IIC
Archer C
Marauder IIC
Locust IIC
Phoenix Hawk IIC

Power Armors:
Clan:
Elemental
Slamander
Undine
Gnome
Sylph

IS:
Kanazuchi
Fenrir
Sloth
Raiden
Purifier
Longinus
IS Standard
Infiltrator MK II
Gray Death Standard
Fa Shin
Cavalier
Kage
Gray Death Scout
Achileus


Humans:
Jaime Wolf
Prince Hanse Davion
Prince Victor Davion
Morgan Kell
Aidan Pryde
Natasha Kerensky



RT:

Mecha:
Spartan [SDR-04-Mk XII]
Gladiator [MBR-07 Mk II]
Excaliber [MBR-04-VI]
Officer's Pod [Glaug]

Power armor:
VR-038 Light Armor Veritech Motorcycle
VR-041 Saber Cyclone
VR-052 Battler Cyclone

Humans:
Rick Hunter
Max Sterling
Roy Fokker


edit:
Removed
Wasp IIC
Stinger IIC
Replaced Archer IIC with the Archer C
Phelan Kell

Added
P-Hawk
P-Hawk IIC
Crusader
RifleMan

I removed Phelan because he should have died long before he rose to his undeserved fame and thus would never have become a warrior..
keeping Victor because he for better or for worse gained fame after becoming a mechwarrior

Edited by VinJade, 04 June 2016 - 04:08 PM.


#2 martian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 8,565 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 06:52 AM

View PostVinJade, on 03 June 2016 - 08:37 PM, said:

Clan:
...
Archer IIC
...
Long Bow IIC
...
Wasp IIC

Sorry, but Archer IIC, Longbow IIC and Wasp IIC do not exist in BattleTech.


View PostVinJade, on 03 June 2016 - 08:37 PM, said:

Stinger IIC

Stinger IIC does exist, that's true, but it does not belong among those old Unseens. It's a quite new Reseen model that has not much in common with the original Stinger.

#3 Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kerensky

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,187 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 08:51 AM

No phoenix hawk? valkyrie? Crusader?

What about kai allard liao? How are these not on the list?

#4 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 10:31 AM

@Martian
No Archer IIC
but there is an Archer [C] though
13 tons Std Armor
10 SHS
4/6/0
Std Engine
2 LRM 20s
4 tons of Ammo
4 ER Medium Lasers
2 CT Rear
2 ER mediums LA/RA

@ASK
Will fix the Missing Mechs but Phelan Kell barely made the list because by all rights He shouldn't even be alive to become a mechwarrior because he took a Clan PPC to the head which is 15 points of damage to a location with only 9 points of armor and 3 i.s. points.

Kai is over rated and only as good as he is due to writer's phat nothing more than that and should only be seen as a elite pilot of 0/0 like Victor & Phelan Kell.

Though I think I will remove Phelon.

edit:
I fixed a misunderstanding after Wiz pointed it out to me.
sorry about that Martian.

Edited by VinJade, 04 June 2016 - 11:09 AM.


#5 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 04 June 2016 - 10:45 AM

Why no Valkyries for Robotech/Macross?
As it stands there is a massive power scale difference between the universes..... the Short Range Missiles found in the Spartans (Robotech: Gladiators) have a range of 5 miles give or take, putting them at more than 4 times the range of the Battle Tech LRM.... mechs like the Phalanx (Robotech Spartan, Battle Tech Long Bow) can deploy 1000km+ long range necular missiles... one sided fight for Macross/Robotech.

#6 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 11:08 AM

@Wiz
your right, that was my mistake when it came to the Locust IIC, I should have read it slower than I did, lol.
still he was right about the Stinger, Wasp, and Archer which I am glad he pointed out to me.

@MR
I didn't add the Valks because I didn't want to add the LAMs to the mix.

Edited by VinJade, 04 June 2016 - 11:10 AM.


#7 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 04:07 PM

@Wiz
That's why I chose the destroids(I think that's what they are called), now that I think about it I forgot the RifleMan... boy I am slipping.

I really didn't want to add their motorcycle battle armor because of the transforming aspect of it but they are kind of lacking in the power armor department...

on a side note; Thanks Wiz you again helped me out.

Edited by VinJade, 04 June 2016 - 04:10 PM.


#8 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 04 June 2016 - 05:19 PM

View PostMarack Drock the Unicorn Wizard, on 04 June 2016 - 10:50 AM, said:



Yeah but by comparison BattleTech armor and such is about 1000 times as powerful. When you watch the show a few bolts of energy from a Valkyrie's gun will shred Robotech armor in a second. BattleTech mechs though can take half of hell before finally blowing up lol.


I wouldn't call a 55mm tri-barrled auto-canon exactly small potatoes.... that's what the Valkyries carried in GU-11 Gun pod.

#9 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 05:24 PM

When it comes to their weapons, that was also up for debate as many always argued that the rt 'cannons' was nothing more than a long range weak MG.

I personally always felt that their weapons was much weaker than BT and for their power armor compared to the IS or even the Clans they would lose in a fight in close quarters.

#10 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 04 June 2016 - 05:53 PM

View PostVinJade, on 04 June 2016 - 05:24 PM, said:

When it comes to their weapons, that was also up for debate as many always argued that the rt 'cannons' was nothing more than a long range weak MG.

I personally always felt that their weapons was much weaker than BT and for their power armor compared to the IS or even the Clans they would lose in a fight in close quarters.


Well I'd argue against that... the partical canons on the Tomahawk (Excalibur) or the three on the Glaug would be just as if not more powerful than those found in BT PPC's. And well, Necular missiles tend to curb stomp things and well Robotech makes use of them, rather extensively at the start of large engagements.... the RMS-1 necular anti-shipping missile, that a Valkyrie can carry six of, are said to be 5 mega-tons each. And for the record, the Phalanx (Spartan) can deploy 44 of them.... like I said curb stomp, when the Robotech forces start the engagement from 1200km out with necular missiles....

#11 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 04 June 2016 - 05:59 PM

View PostMarack Drock the Unicorn Wizard, on 04 June 2016 - 05:55 PM, said:

Agreed. their weapons are like tinker toys by comparison.


Yeah except their "nuclear missiles" (I use that lightly) don't exactly act like a nuke. A real nuke would wipe out everything in a 50 mile radius let alone one that weighs 5 megatons. So again Robotech weapons make NO logical sense.


5 mega-tons is the yield, not the weight.... you don't honestly think a real world 50 mega-ton I.C.B.M. warhead weighs that much right?

A yield of 1 mega-ton, means it has the same destructive power of 1 million tons of TNT.

Edit:

Also the bulk of the fighting in Robotech/Macross takes place in space, a Nuke is much less effective in space due to the lack of pressure to create a compression wave, needed for the bulk of the damage they cause.

Edited by Metus regem, 04 June 2016 - 06:08 PM.


#12 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 04 June 2016 - 07:28 PM

WOB would glass an entire planet without batting an eye while also using Bio weapons without a second thought.
Though lets try and keep WOMD to a min don't want to blow up the planet just show who is better ;)

Money on BT, more so the Clanners, after all no one is better at ripping a mech a new one than clanners and I bet the RT mecha wouldn't stand a chance against them..

#13 VinJade

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,211 posts

Posted 05 June 2016 - 07:32 AM

@Wiz
Yeah, that's one of the things used in defense of why BT is better, sure RT mecha are fast but they lack the armor or fire power to do much if anything to a Battlemech's armor.

Their armor on all of their units even their might space ships have paper thin skin, good example is when the Zendtida(sp) planted spies among those in the SDF-1, they peeled back some flesh on the ship, dropped of the spies and pushed the skin of the ship back into place and took off.

Yet no alarms went off and nothing about spacing in that section ether.

while a BT war ship has thick armored skin and anything that puts a hole no matter how small the size or location they would know.

Also their machines are so poorly put together it seems, good example is when the sdf-1 tried to take off and all of their anti-gravity generators ripped out of the ship creating four massive holes in it.

I almost forgot but a large chunk of the engine/power distrobution system vanished without a trace which means that The thing had to transform just to fire the main weapon.

Also their main weapon takes forever to charge and fire and unless it manages to hit the target their weapon becomes a one hit wonder.

anyways I think if the BT forces can close in quick enough with the RT forces such as in a city fight, they would be easy prey as the Clan counter parts have no Min-range on their LRMs & PPCs while their GRs and even small caliber ACs would rip them apart not to mention their Light - Heavy MGs.

While the IS/clans have Infernos as well that would roast the mecha pilots alive.

Though one thing I have always been confused about when it comes to their fighter/mechas, are the cockpits in the 'head' or the chest of the machine when they transform?

if it is in the Chest then they are screwed seeing as the chest has the most surface area which means easier to hit unlike the head.

though then again does it matter when a stiff breeze can destroy a verotech fighter?

Edited by VinJade, 05 June 2016 - 08:16 AM.


#14 Nebfer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • LocationFlorida

Posted 01 July 2016 - 03:19 PM

Well one thing to note is Robotech is not Macross, which is a good thing for B-tech as by the time you get to Frontier Macross is starting to seriously out class B-tech...


One thing to note is with Vertechs if the info presented here is accurate, then the Valkyrie is in for some difficulty's. Though from what I can tell the site is largely a fan site with some dubious canon info... Some info at lest seems lifted from it's macross counter parts...

Delta V is ~11.4km/s, or 14.4km/s for the super. (7.8km/s will just get you to space from the ground FYI, ~10km/s if one accounts for some drag.) -so this is likely lower end value.
The following info is actually derived from Macross...

Acceleration for the Valk is 3.86Gs when empty (51.3 metric tons of thrust / 13.3t empty), super has 240 metric tons of thrust on a 19.1 ton empty frame, it dose mention it has at lest 11 tons of fuel however. .

In an Atmosphear the Valkyrie is stated to have the following top speeds
At Sea Level Mach 1.4 (~1,715kph)
At 10,000m Mach 2.71 (~2,920kph)
At 30,000m Mach 3.87 (~4,200kph)
Max unboosted altitude is 35,000 meters

Ground Speed 160kph (rough equivalent to 10/15 movement)

In Comparison a SB-27 Saber
Delta V 120km/s on internal, 180km/s with droptanks (half these values if afterburner consistently used)

Acceleration 5.5Gs or 8.5Gs with the "afterburner"

Speed
Sea Level to ~18km 3,960kph (Mach 3.72)
Max Atmospheric speed 16,200kph -Mach 16.7 at 90km altitude

Note using the High altitude rules then the max speeds are as fallows
Ground - 0-17km safe velocity 2 (2,160kph) Mach 2.04: though this is also the area where low altitude speeds are used.*
Row 1 - 18-35km safe velocity 3 (3,240kph) Mach 3.05 (at 20km)
Row 2 - 36-53km safe velocity 6 (6,480kph) Mach ~5.6
Row 3 - 54-71km safe velocity 9 (9,720kph) Mach ~8.75
Row 4 - 72-89km safe velocity 12 (12,960kph) Mach ~12.75
Interface -90-107km safe velocity 15 (16,200kph) Mach ~15.75
* that rules set is top speed is 2x safe thrust, though using aircraft on the ground maps limits top speed to 2,160kph

Though the Novels have a slightly different take on over all top speed, with a number of cases where ASFs are being listed as flying at hypersonic velocity's at 500m above the ground (6,100kph+).

Ground speed wise the Valk is not much different from many light mechs in terms of speed, though it's notably better armed. With by rough caliber association an AC-5, perhaps a UAC-5 if one wants.

Ground wise the Ground units of Robotech are per the uRRG (linked above) interestingly slower than their macross counter parts but with the same dimensions and armaments, though the RRG lists energy outputs for the energy weapons. For example the Tomahawk has a pair of 30 Megajoule particle cannons listed in the uRRG.

In comparison if one uses the old Fallguy energy weapon numbers a clan hvy large laser is roughly 63ish megajoules.

The Fallguy numbers where derived from the fact that 2 liters of petrochemicals was enough to fire a specific RPG support laser once using a ICE recharge, and assuming a ~8% efficiency rate (from the recharger to the laser and from the laser to the actual beam), as such he peged a damage point for energy weapons as ~6.25 Megajoules.

Quote

Quote

Incidentally, how'd you settle on 55 megajoules for a large laser? ISTR you once advocating much higher energy releases for BT energy weapons.


Yeah, I used to peg lasers a lot higher, but then I expanded my list of data points to include the RPGs. It was there that my equations fell flat on their face and I had to start from scratch. (yeah, I’ll admit my mistakes) The limiter is the 'Power Points' which I have all but proof that they are equal to a kilowatt-hour. For example, a 10kg Fossil Fuel generator makes 15 Power Points per hour. This is a little lighter than current technology can make a 15-kilowatt generator. But the real evidence lies in the fuel consumption or 2 liters per hour. Even pumping these magic generators up to 15 kilowatts from 2 liters of gasoline gets you 77.57% conversion efficiency from the potential energy of gasoline.

That's amazing in it's own right, but it's more or less confirmed by the solar generator that generates 45 Power. Assuming the same 95% efficiency ratio of Jump Sails and Earth-normal sunlight providing 1,353 watts per square meter, a 6.68 meter diameter collector will generate 45 kilowatts per hour. To get higher power per power point would require bigger and bigger collectors. (my original energy levels would have required solar collector areas half the size of a hex)

The last nail in the coffin is the 100 Power Point fusion generator. Using an efficiency of 8.84% for a power-optimized 40kg reactor and a fuel consumption equal in cost to a fossil fuel generator (2 C-bills per hour for either 2 liters of petrochemical fuel or 2/15ths of a liter of hydrogen) the power generation is 100 kilowatts per hour. Thus we have a power point equal to 3.6 megajoules. We also have a hole in the rules that says that fusion generators have negligible fuel usage when in fact they do have a noticeable usage equal in cost to a conventional Fossil fuel generator. (albeit with 6-7 times the output for that same cost) If you try and push efficiency up to reduce fuel consumption to the point that it is negligible, you run into the problem of fusion being too power efficient for other parts of the game. (like charging Jumpships )

How much energy does a Heavy Support Laser (Medium Laser) take to fire? 20 according to MW 3rd edition. That makes the power input 72 megajoules per shot. Thus our beam output can't be higher than that, can it? In fact, it has to be well below that to allow for inefficiencies in the system. After running a number of scenarios and comparing every laser in the game against the numbers, I reached a workable ratio of 6.25-to-1 for megajoules of beam energy to damage points.

Further backing this up was the heat generated by the weapon assuming the efficiencies that the known power inputs and beam outputs create. It created a nearly perfect curve of 5,250,000 joules of thermal energy per heat point. (5,000 BTUs) Given 10 full seconds for a pure radiator (no convection so it works in vacuum too) Heat Sink, that allows for Heat sinks to have a surface area small enough to pack dozens on a 10 meter tall BattleMech with a magical 0.99 Emissiveness for Heat Sinks. This makes the Heat sinks of a unit glow about like a cook-top when running at peak output, temperatures reaching as high as 700°K.

Meanwhile, the rest of the heat of weapons fire comes from the 21.101 Kilojoules of waste heat (20 BTUs) generated by the fusion reactor per megajoule of power generated. This meshed in perfectly with the system and is well within the limits of thermal waste generation for current-day (non-energy positive) fusion reactors. I doubt making the reactors more efficient will change this much. It's not a matter of efficiency, but a matter of the limits of thermal isolation in a closed-cycle fusion reaction.

This left me with the following stats for laser weapons that I believe are about as accurate as I can get.


Code:
Weapon Power Rqd. Beam Energy Efficiency
Small Laser (I.S. Level 1): 36 mj 19 mj 52.1%
Medium Laser (I.S. Level 1): 72 mj 31 mj 43.4%
Large Laser (I.S. Level 1): 144 mj 50 mj 34.7%.
ER Small Laser (I.S. Level 2): 54 mj 19 mj 34.7%
ER Medium Laser (I.S. Level 2): 72 mj 31 mj 43.4%
ER Large Laser (I.S. Level 2): 162 mj 50 mj 30.9%.
Small Pulse Laser (I.S. Level 2): 76 mj 19 mj 24.8%
Medium Pulse Laser (I.S. Level 2): 86 mj 38 mj 43.4%
Large Pulse Laser (I.S. Level 2): 162 mj 56 mj 34.7%.
ER Micro Laser (Clan Level 2): 36 mj 13 mj 34.7%
ER Small Laser (Clan Level 2): 54 mj 31 mj 57.9%
ER Medium Laser (Clan Level 2): 72 mj 44 mj 60.8%
ER Large Laser (Clan Level 2): 162 mj 63 mj 38.6%.
Micro Pulse Laser (Clan Level 2): 43 mj 19 mj 43.4%
Small Pulse Laser (Clan Level 2): 76 mj 19 mj 24.8%
Medium Pulse Laser (Clan Level 2): 86 mj 44 mj 50.6%
Large Pulse Laser (Clan Level 2): 62 mj 63 mj 38.6%.
Heavy Small Laser (Clan Level 2): 54 mj 38 mj 69.4%
Heavy Medium Laser (Clan Level 2): 108 mj 63 mj 57.9%
Heavy Large Laser (Clan Level 2): 216 mj 100 mj 46.3%

--
Nice side effect of this is that by bringing down the energy level of BT lasers, we bring everything down... including the 'magical-ness' of BT armor.

Interestingly, BT armor does much better against kinetic impact than it does against lasers, which explains why lasers and PPCs became better developed over the years. That was BT armor's weakness. (relatively speaking) Kinetic damage needs almost exactly twice the energy to inflict the same amount of damage on BT armor. Given that the most sci-fi part of BT armor is the interlaced diamond monofilament weave which is supposed to be what prevents penetration and spalling, this makes sense.

We could probably design armor today that could stop an 18 megajoule Small Laser, but doing it with a budget of 187.5 kilograms and still have mass to make the same section stop a 37.5 megajoule kinetic penetrator cold (like a 100 kg object moving Mach 2.54) would be impossible today. (note that the M829E3 APFSDS-T kinetic penetrator used on the M1A2 is only a 12 megajoule weapon, making it an AC-1 under this model)


also

Cray (the guy who wrote a fair bit of techmanual) would peg the same damage point at around 30ish megajoules IIRC, which is where I would generally put it, and this is derived from the repeated novel references of "rivers" of molten armor falling off the mech.

Quote

Flashpoint Ch 11
Ruby-tinged beams of light stabbed out from its arm-mounted lasers, splashing damage across the Devastator's broad chest and sending rivers of molten armor to the ground. Warning alarms signaled damage to the internal skeleton, to actuators and the assault machine's myomer muscles, to one of his medium lasers, and to the physical shielding of his fusion engine. David stumbled from the loss of three tons of protective Durallex plating, staying on his feet by sheer force of will.


Quote

Flashpoint Ch 14
Smith had exhausted his limited gauss ammunition earlier, but he lent Amanda a pair of large lasers that cut deep along the Gunslinger's left side. Molten armor runnelled to the ground, splashing fiery slag onto the once-pristine trails.


Quote

Flashpoint Ch 29
Evan's lasers worried armor into molten streams and puddles all over the other machine, costing it at least a solid ton of protection.


Quote

Imminent Crisis Ch 28
They all found their mark, the energy beams sloughing off armor in molten rivulets while the short-range missiles blasted through the holes that appeared underneath the trails of liquid metal.


Quote

Lethal Heritage Ch 8
The first beam melted the armor from the Locust's torso, making it drip steaming to the asteroid's surface while exposing the 'Mech's skeleton and internal structures.


Quote

Test of Vengence Ch 3
Five ruby beams shot from each of his 'Mech's arms into the flank of the behemoth, gouging scorched red and black trenches and sending more than four tons of melted armor bubbling to the pavement below.


Quote

Malicious Intent Ch 6
As the Gladiator took a step forward, Vlad hit his triggers. The PPCs' azure lightning stabbed into the right side of the Gladiator's chest and played along its right arm. Molten ferro-ceramic armor bubbled up and dripped off the 'Mech, gushing down its side. The Warhawk's twin large pulse lasers shot volleys of green energy darts at the distant target. They lanced through the armor froth on the Gladiator's right arm, stripping away the last of the armor. Their energy unspent, they began frying both the ferrotitanium bones and myomer fibers that made the arm useful.


Quote

Malicious Intent Ch 28
The dot in the center of his cross hairs glowed red, and Doc hit the triggers for his half-dozen pulse lasers. The laser fire hit the Goshawk solidly, liquefying armor on the 'Mech's right flank and over its heart. The lasers also burned two-thirds of the armor from the 'Mech's left arm and bubbled armor on its left thigh. One laser's energy darts played over the Goshawk's small head, sending molten armor flooding down over the 'Mech's shoulders and chest.


Quote

Double Blind Ch 1
This time it worked, and Marcus managed to find solid purchase within the loose rubble long enough to trigger the particle projection cannons that were the arms of his own 'Mech. Two azure beams stabbed out at the Jager-Mech, one grazing the left leg and the other boring deep into an already-damaged right arm. Armor melted and poured to the ground in streams of molten steel. Then the Jag's right arm suddenly dropped, a blackened, ruined shell swinging loosely from its shoulder-mount hinge. Deprived of a major weapon and rocking under the loss of two tons of armor, the enemy 'Mech staggered his machine back around the building.


Quote

Patriots and Tyrants Ch 13
Its large and small lasers speared scarlet light directly into the Crockett’s turret-bodied chest, melting off armor in molten streams.


None of these seem like the result of 1 to 5 megajoules which one would have from the very old and no longer canon battle technology magazine numbers, which has some people wanting to use because realism (though they sprout that tech manual fits with their arguments)...

#15 Nebfer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • LocationFlorida

Posted 05 July 2016 - 08:36 PM

View PostMarack Drock the Unicorn Wizard, on 04 July 2016 - 06:08 PM, said:

What the **** are you talking about? Robotech IS Macross. Macross is the first in the entire goddamn series (chronologically and release date too).

And again read all these posts. Robotech armor is like as thin as paper. I could probably bend it with my ****.

...
Despite the fact that Robotech comes from Macross and uses many of the same elements, their not the same universe.

Some differences is the ending, the Bridge crew in Robotech are largely all killed, In Macross they all live, furthermore the ship is not destroyed in Macross. In Macoss Protoculture is a precursor race that made the Zentraedi, where as in Robotech it's a fuel source (Another difference is that Macross dose not have a SDF-2 to be taken out in the end (their is a SDF-2 in the Macross universe however -it was built on the Moon, not on Earth)).

Lastly the two universes are separate, Macross Frontier dose not happen at any point in the Robotech time line, Nor dose Macross Delta, or any of the other Macross production, and vice versa.
=====================================================================

In the end with Robotech, while I have not largely seen it (what little I have was a long time ago), by in large given the weapons used, and if we use the figures from the uRRG, at best Robotech is running around with by in large AC-5s and medium laser equivalents (assuming fallguy numbers). And in the air and space out maneuvered by ASFs.

Effectively Robotech mechs are in B-tech terms are by in large light mechs, though in some cases very well armed ones.
Their fast and well armed (notably the Tomahawk), but not necessarily well armored.

Edited by Nebfer, 05 July 2016 - 08:37 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users