![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/clanwolf.png)
#1
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:03 AM
I am just trying to get a handle on what it is that people perceive to be OP about this mech. It is undoubtedly good, but far from being a showstopper. The loads of KDK pilots turning in 100-200 damage scores can tell you that.
So, elaborate, WHY do YOU think the KDK is, or is not, stronger than the AS7 or MAL?
#2
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:04 AM
#3
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:06 AM
#4
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:09 AM
Getting 100-200 dmg in one game doesn't mean squat, you of all peeps know that better them most im sure. But one 1000-2000 dmg game doesn't really mean anything either. But the NS guys i ran with last night were pretty consistently putting up 700-900 no problem. Some still have ammo left and armor to spare.
Nothing you cant do in a MAL or DWF though...
Evan20k, on 18 May 2016 - 11:06 AM, said:
I run a sEXE with a 76 alpha, this isnt really something new to see alphas that high on actual playable builds.
2 LPL and 10 Er smalls, 76 alpha with a crazy cooldown but no range.
#5
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:10 AM
The Spirit Bear vs the Atlas-S... The Atlas is better at what it does, but the Spirit Bear is more forgiving because it has the agility to disengage. If you are set up correctly, the Atlas is objectively superior, even without the speed and MASC. Again, slightly different tools for different situations. If you know you MUST close as quickly as possible, the Spirit Bear is good, but honestly, it won't out brawl an Atlas-S once in range.
If ANYTHING, I could see the KDK-3 losing its agility quirks. The Mauler doesn't have them either, and with the high hardpoints the KDK has, they are a bit superfluous. I'm not super worried about it, I don't really think about those agility quirks when I am gutting people with 4 UAC10s.
#7
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:11 AM
Now in FW.... Not fun to come up against a wall of Kodiaks. My unit is fairly good, but even we lost 2 waves vs their 1 Wave of Kodiaks. As far as FW goes, I think the Clans Drop weight should be lowered so that they have to sacrifice tonnage if they want to run all of those Kodiaks.
#8
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:12 AM
Tyler Valentine, on 18 May 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:
We can put this to rest as well, IIC have Clan tech too and they are terrible for the most part (aside from a few Jenner Builds but they are still fragile as glass). Clan tech is not that OP where it will make up for other shortcomings, like Hitboxes, weapons placement, etc.
Clan tech is good, dont get me wrong but its not flatout AMAZINGLY BETTER like most would have us believe. I still fear a Blk Knight in ANY clan mech, even a KDK.
Gyrok, on 18 May 2016 - 11:10 AM, said:
I ran that a bunch last night, i can say that the KDK aint got SH*t on my fatlas.
#9
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:16 AM
Seriously, though, it isn't much better or worse in any regard than other tier 1/2 assaults. The Stalker still runs cooler with more large lasers, the Mauler's FLD DPS isn't any less impressive now, etc.
I will say that I haven't run a quad UAC10 Kodiak 3 yet, though. I ran it with the 400XL, quad UAC5s, and medium lasers last night and thought it was decent. I ran the Kodiak 1 with what is sure to become the meta: 2LPL and 5MPL (adding that 6th MPL makes it a little too hot). I ran the Spirit Bear near stock. Good impressions overall, but nothing I'd call terribly OP.
#10
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:17 AM
#12
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:33 AM
I cannot quaantify the disparity, though, and collapse it down to a single value of which one is better.
Edited by Prosperity Park, 18 May 2016 - 11:34 AM.
#13
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:43 AM
Gyrok, on 18 May 2016 - 11:03 AM, said:
...
I am just trying to get a handle on what it is that people perceive to be OP about this mech.
You answered your own question.
And yes, the Unseen were "OP" for the same reason. The Kodiak is just even more popular than those were, and is an Assault carrying Dire Wolf-levels of firepower, so seems more OP en masse than the Unseen did.
For at least a few days, everyone is going to be dying to Kodiaks constantly. Ergo, Kodiak must be OP, right? No... not when half of each team is made up of Kodiaks. Look at the screenshots people have been posting. Yeah, some people are doing really well in Kodiaks, but there are at least as many 200-damage Kodiaks showing up in those games, too.
It's fine. Give it a couple of weeks for the newness to wear off.
#15
Posted 18 May 2016 - 11:56 AM
Evan20k, on 18 May 2016 - 11:06 AM, said:
if it were PP-FLD mebbe. The fact it's burst means I find the KDK does high dmg, but comparably low Kill Ratio for dmg.
Nyte Kitsune, on 18 May 2016 - 11:11 AM, said:
Now in FW.... Not fun to come up against a wall of Kodiaks. My unit is fairly good, but even we lost 2 waves vs their 1 Wave of Kodiaks. As far as FW goes, I think the Clans Drop weight should be lowered so that they have to sacrifice tonnage if they want to run all of those Kodiaks.
you realize that to run 100 tonners means they do pretty well scrap the rest of their deck for true effectiveness? Crows ain't the FW terrors they once were.
Also, go do an IS Dropdeck with 12 Boarsheads or AS7-S and you'll get a similar result. (And also, against a better built opfor deck, lose, just like 12 KDK can and do)
#16
Posted 18 May 2016 - 12:02 PM
I'd say the KDK-3 is about on par with a Dakka Mauler, what it lacks in PPFLD it makes up for in sheer volume of firepower. The hardpoint location is also a lot nicer on the KDK-3 than the MAL.
I'd say the Spirit Bear is almost but not quite on par with an Atlas. In AS7-S/D-DC vs Spirit Bear, Atlas all day. I will say that the Spirit Bear is the second best brawler in game though behind the Atlas, that speed and MASC makes it a scary mofo and when one goes Drop Bear on you, it's hard to get away. MASC also makes a bit more forgiving than Atlas in positioning errors.
I saw a few standard Gaussvomit KDKs that did... acceptably. One of my buddies was rolling a 2x Goose, 2x cLPL, and 2x cERML and he said it was a whale that traded a cERML for a lot more speed.
But other than the KDK-3 and SB, the rest are pretty lackluster. But this is definitely an assault the Clan line-up needed.
Edited by Saint Scarlett Johan, 18 May 2016 - 12:23 PM.
#17
Posted 18 May 2016 - 12:02 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 18 May 2016 - 11:56 AM, said:
Even if you think of the ballistics like screen-shaking lasers, 500m+ range with that much damage is still really, really good without any of the drawbacks (Direwolf) normally associated with that damage+range.
#18
Posted 18 May 2016 - 12:12 PM
Gyrok, on 18 May 2016 - 11:03 AM, said:
I am just trying to get a handle on what it is that people perceive to be OP about this mech. It is undoubtedly good, but far from being a showstopper. The loads of KDK pilots turning in 100-200 damage scores can tell you that.
So, elaborate, WHY do YOU think the KDK is, or is not, stronger than the AS7 or MAL?
Been trying to get an answer to this in a few different threads. So far nuthin. Best I can tell is that those asserting OP status are referring near exclusively to the 3 (with the possible exception above), and even in the case of the 3 I think it is merely because that alpha is indeed really impressive, especially if you are not particularly mobile when getting hit by it (so what else is new?). That's the best I have been able to divine from the vauge OP assertions I have read in about a dozen different threads. Specifics in the form of videos or other objective observations would do wonders for this sort of conversation. But I suppose that just isn't possible when folks have a preconceived notion that they just have to "prove". Sigh.
#19
Posted 18 May 2016 - 12:17 PM
Evan20k, on 18 May 2016 - 12:02 PM, said:
There are drawbacks associated with both the Whale and Kodiak at that range, it is called poor projectile velocity, and it is what stops both from being able to actually compete with the Mauler at 500+.
#20
Posted 18 May 2016 - 12:18 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users