data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06347/06347348ffd4c09754f130b3c4e6486862b19251" alt=""
#pgiplz
#1
Posted 10 June 2016 - 07:40 AM
#2
Posted 10 June 2016 - 07:43 AM
#3
Posted 10 June 2016 - 07:46 AM
#4
Posted 10 June 2016 - 07:48 AM
GRiPSViGiL, on 10 June 2016 - 07:46 AM, said:
Simple solution : don't offer cockpit items. Offer (C) mechs again like Phase 3 launch.
#7
Posted 10 June 2016 - 08:49 AM
Afuldan McKronik, on 10 June 2016 - 08:30 AM, said:
When has Paul ever used that data, and used it correctly?
I would bet dollars to beer that PGI knows exactly what mechs gets used, why they get used, and what the balance is across all the weight classes is like. I'm sure that data is there on their systems, but for what ever reason our Balance Overlord does not or will not look at the data for what ever reason. It's why weapons like the MG, that just need a simple .XML change to go from bad to okay doesn't happen. There are enough simple and balanced fixes for a lot of the weapons that the community has figured out, but for what ever reason, these simple and balanced fixes seem to be ignored or not understood by Paul; the Balance Overlord.
#8
Posted 10 June 2016 - 08:53 AM
Metus regem, on 10 June 2016 - 08:49 AM, said:
When has Paul ever used that data, and used it correctly?
I would bet dollars to beer that PGI knows exactly what mechs gets used, why they get used, and what the balance is across all the weight classes is like. I'm sure that data is there on their systems, but for what ever reason our Balance Overlord does not or will not look at the data for what ever reason. It's why weapons like the MG, that just need a simple .XML change to go from bad to okay doesn't happen. There are enough simple and balanced fixes for a lot of the weapons that the community has figured out, but for what ever reason, these simple and balanced fixes seem to be ignored or not understood by Paul; the Balance Overlord.
It would show it in a simple format, capable of being read by anyone, instead of hidden away. But what do I know.
#9
Posted 10 June 2016 - 08:54 AM
#10
Posted 10 June 2016 - 09:07 AM
Afuldan McKronik, on 10 June 2016 - 07:43 AM, said:
The last open leaderboard event was September...
NINE
MONTHS
AGO
Since then, the only way you could play a leaderboard event is if you had pre-ordered a mech. Basically an entrance fee for crap rewards.
#11
Posted 10 June 2016 - 09:08 AM
#13
Posted 10 June 2016 - 09:29 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a6c5/8a6c58031ba9222548bbc58d8cfd269d51b2dc88" alt="Posted Image"
#14
Posted 10 June 2016 - 12:40 PM
#17
Posted 10 June 2016 - 04:18 PM
Afuldan McKronik, on 10 June 2016 - 07:43 AM, said:
Nope,Nope, Nope,... NOPE!
Afuldan McKronik, on 10 June 2016 - 08:30 AM, said:
Leaderboards are very toxic and unhealthy.
Also, please stop bringing in "info for the devs" argument. They have that info already. All they need to do is to USE it.
#18
Posted 10 June 2016 - 04:35 PM
Navid A1, on 10 June 2016 - 04:18 PM, said:
Nope,Nope, Nope,... NOPE!
Leaderboards are very toxic and unhealthy.
Also, please stop bringing in "info for the devs" argument. They have that info already. All they need to do is to USE it.
Forums are very toxic and unhealthy also. Yet here we are.
Heres a fixed wording for you then.
Would it perhaps show exactly what mechs the playerbase should be QQing about across all 4 weight classes?
#19
Posted 10 June 2016 - 07:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users