Introducing The Catapult 'Butterbee' Hero Mech!
#181
Posted 13 June 2016 - 03:33 PM
Butterbee is just too random and non-sensical, whereas having a Liao Hero Catapult makes sense from a lore standpoint.
#182
Posted 13 June 2016 - 04:21 PM
LegendaryArticuno, on 13 June 2016 - 03:33 PM, said:
Butterbee is just too random and non-sensical, whereas having a Liao Hero Catapult makes sense from a lore standpoint.
...except that the Butterbee *is* from lore
Edited by MovinTarget, 13 June 2016 - 04:43 PM.
#183
Posted 13 June 2016 - 05:54 PM
I do have a question for the Devs that I ether missed or haven't seen yet. How will this effect my Founder's Catapult unique artistic expression?
#185
Posted 14 June 2016 - 03:59 AM
MovinTarget, on 13 June 2016 - 04:21 PM, said:
...except that the Butterbee *is* from lore
And... here's the link... http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Catapult#Custom_Variants
~D. V. "Enjoy!" Devnull
#186
Posted 14 June 2016 - 04:39 AM
D V Devnull, on 14 June 2016 - 03:59 AM, said:
~D. V. "Enjoy!" Devnull
Things I don't bother trying to do from my phone... tnx D V!
#187
Posted 16 June 2016 - 05:33 AM
#188
Posted 16 June 2016 - 05:59 AM
President D Jones, on 16 June 2016 - 05:33 AM, said:
I started off with the intent of saying it's too "fat", and compare it to an EBJ (same weight, similar shape), but I'll let the community look for themselves...
I tried to ensure that the images are fairly close in size and the ratios untouched to prevent the skewing of appearance.
They look pretty similar to me, the EBJ is a little sleeker and a smidge shorter (with the laser rack), but being, newer and more advanced would certainly be a valid argument for that difference. So unless the EBJ is getting a rescale as well...
Granted, I don't own any of the missile 'pults so if the contention is those missile arms, someone else will have to demonstrate this.
Edited by MovinTarget, 16 June 2016 - 06:00 AM.
#189
Posted 16 June 2016 - 06:18 AM
#190
Posted 16 June 2016 - 06:50 AM
MovinTarget, on 16 June 2016 - 05:59 AM, said:
I started off with the intent of saying it's too "fat", and compare it to an EBJ (same weight, similar shape), but I'll let the community look for themselves...
I tried to ensure that the images are fairly close in size and the ratios untouched to prevent the skewing of appearance.
They look pretty similar to me, the EBJ is a little sleeker and a smidge shorter (with the laser rack), but being, newer and more advanced would certainly be a valid argument for that difference. So unless the EBJ is getting a rescale as well...
Granted, I don't own any of the missile 'pults so if the contention is those missile arms, someone else will have to demonstrate this.
Literally everything is being rescaled.
The catapult is being scaled based on the standard variants - the missile variants.
As well, while in that photo the catapult looks a bit "fatter" it is actually substantially larger in volume. The legs are thicker, the torso is far thicker and taller; it's bigger all around.
The EBJ is much, much sleeker.
President D Jones, on 16 June 2016 - 06:18 AM, said:
And yes, scaling is fair between IS and clan, it's done per volume:tonnage, so the end result is the Catapult will "displace the same amount of water" as a thunderbolt or EBJ.
But you can't compare the rescaled CPLT to the current EBJ or TDR, because the EBJ and TDR are changing as well.
#194
Posted 16 June 2016 - 07:26 AM
Wintersdark, on 16 June 2016 - 06:50 AM, said:
Literally everything is being rescaled.
The catapult is being scaled based on the standard variants - the missile variants.
As well, while in that photo the catapult looks a bit "fatter" it is actually substantially larger in volume. The legs are thicker, the torso is far thicker and taller; it's bigger all around.
The EBJ is much, much sleeker.
The catapult and thunderbolt have very different shapes.
And yes, scaling is fair between IS and clan, it's done per volume:tonnage, so the end result is the Catapult will "displace the same amount of water" as a thunderbolt or EBJ.
But you can't compare the rescaled CPLT to the current EBJ or TDR, because the EBJ and TDR are changing as well.
You're only looking at it from one angle, too. The Cauldron Born is quite long from nose to arse. And its arms are enormous. And, if you tack on a pair of LRM20s on the shoulder, the mech practically doubles in size... (obviously exaggerating, but it does add a pretty significant bump on the hitbox)
#195
Posted 16 June 2016 - 08:00 AM
Twilight Fenrir, on 16 June 2016 - 07:26 AM, said:
It's arms are a tiny fraction of the size of the Catapult's arms (again, the scaling is based on the main variants, not the K2 in the CPLT case).
The Catapult torso is MUCH larger than the EBJ torso, it's not even close. Look:
Note as well that dynamic weapon geometry for the most part isn't accounted for in the rescale. I believe they use the "prime" variant (and one chosen arbitrarily from the IS) stock loadout for scaling purposes.
#196
Posted 16 June 2016 - 08:05 AM
Wintersdark, on 16 June 2016 - 08:00 AM, said:
The Catapult torso is MUCH larger than the EBJ torso, it's not even close. Look:
[OT] Which pattern and colors did you used for that EBJ? It's fantastic [/OT]
#200
Posted 16 June 2016 - 08:33 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users