5 replies to this topic

[QueenBlade]

This last weekend's matches I noticed on the schedule page that my bot was recording matches as played but no winner.

<div class="schedule-time-container block played ">
<div class="schedule-time-start"></div>
<div class="schedule-time center">10:00 PM EDT/EST - The Americas</div>
<div class="schedule-time-end"></div>
</div>

When manually checking it, I noticed that matches were indeed being giving a status of played, but with no winner. What's more confusing is both teams are active. I inquired with the refs on a couple of the matches and was told they are double forfeits.

But some of these matches I still feel like that isn't the case.

6/23

• Muthr_SwKrs vs Watch Dogs

6/24

• Honey Badger vs Blood Pearls
  
• 42 Smoke Jays vs Trolln
  
• Chaos Within vs QuebecLegion

6/25

• Widowmakers vs Trolln
  
• Alpha-Strike vs QuebecLegion
  
• Muthr_SwKrs vs BSIRenegades

Again, the matches above are currently marked as Played with no winner selected. Leading me to believe they are double forfeits which I do not believe is correct for all of them. Especially since it is not reflected in their standings. If this is the case, I urge PGI to rethink how they are labeling the matches for Played and Forfeit / Double Forfeit.

[VVonka]

Some of those teams have had issues with players showing. Also its possible it is reported as a double forfeit because neither team reported in the reschedule thread but they actually may have rescheduled.


There is no indication from a normal eye that these matches were actually played, to my eye they look like still pending matches.

[QueenBlade]

Right, thus why I asked. Cause previous behavior was that is stayed as Scheduled until there was a result to be posted. But when I noticed an increase in matches being 'played' but no winner selected. I asked refs for a status on them. To which a majority of them were Double Forfeits. Yesterday the Lords_NA vs The Watch match was in a state of Double Forfeit, but when I asked about that I was told that it was played and Lords had won. Why a winner wasn't selected until recently, I don't know. But it does make things confusing.

[Grrzoot]

some of those matches were on the stream. with bandit as ref, maybe he marked them but has of yet uploaded screens or something, i see at least 5 matches there that i saw on the stream.

[Lukoi Banacek]

Do not believe the caster is responsible for posting results, but I've been wrong before

[lpmagic]

not the casters 'responsibility" no, but in this case, Bandit is a ref so yes.

Edited by lpmagic, 29 June 2016 - 08:59 AM.