

2 Pilots 1 Mech (Co-Pilot)
#1
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:25 PM
It would make it easy to train new people, and would be down right interesting.
They could control coolant and modules, regulate ecm, control override, communicate with team on your behalf, call targets for you, watch minimap, and help you coordinate.
Is this interesting or a no no?
#2
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:30 PM
#3
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:35 PM
#4
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:36 PM
JediPanther, on 23 June 2016 - 05:35 PM, said:
But Yoda did sit on Luke's back in the Dagobah system. So... your argument is flawed.
#5
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:38 PM
#6
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:39 PM
#7
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:41 PM
Edited by HammerMaster, 23 June 2016 - 05:41 PM.
#8
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:43 PM
one of us would drive and the other guy would man the turret (torso)
#9
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:50 PM
#10
Posted 23 June 2016 - 05:52 PM
Alistair Winter, on 23 June 2016 - 05:36 PM, said:
Not really. Yoda was in spectator mode, and as always was busting balls of the guy actually running around doing stuff ("there is no Try" crap....just like dead guys in match chat lol).

#12
Posted 23 June 2016 - 06:06 PM
#13
Posted 23 June 2016 - 06:24 PM
Omega: http://www.sarna.net...ega_(BattleMech)
#16
Posted 23 June 2016 - 07:33 PM
If anything, Missile control would be given to the second pilot. I saw Shavaxi give his cousin control of his missiles in MW3. It was cool. You can do a helmet-cued launch system for SSRM and LRM at least.
#17
Posted 23 June 2016 - 07:44 PM
Snowbluff, on 23 June 2016 - 07:33 PM, said:
I disagree in the use of the word "literally" in this context. There is a cost and benefit associated with single seats and 2 man crews.
#18
Posted 23 June 2016 - 07:53 PM
Moldur, on 23 June 2016 - 07:44 PM, said:
Yeah the cost of a heavier plane for something that WILL be replaced by an RPA operator as the "second pilot" in the next decade. F35s don't even need a second head; the DAS sensors can give the full view.
It's an outmoded idea, for the same reason why we don't need to equip C3 computers to share target data.
#19
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users