3 replies to this topic

[Cookie King]

Simple really. There should be a minimum amount of matches played before you show up on the leaderboards.

Perhaps 20 matches?

All these names at the top with 1 match score is just annoying.

[Champion of Khorne Lord of Blood]

Cookie King, on 24 June 2016 - 05:31 AM, said:

Simple really. There should be a minimum amount of matches played before you show up on the leaderboards.

Perhaps 20 matches?

All these names at the top with 1 match score is just annoying.

They could definitely say you need 25 matches and have it line up with cadet bonus before you get on leaderboard.

[Pariah Devalis]

Cookie King, on 24 June 2016 - 05:31 AM, said:

Simple really. There should be a minimum amount of matches played before you show up on the leaderboards.

Perhaps 20 matches?

All these names at the top with 1 match score is just annoying.

I agree. I'd say there should be a minimum of 25 games per weight class before you even appear on the score board. 25, because a better base sample size of 50-100 would be a little excessively time consuming.

That is to say, for the heavy category, play at least 25 games in that weight class before you appear on that list for heavies. Same for the others.

Edited by Pariah Devalis, 24 June 2016 - 06:55 AM.

[Idealsuspect]

Cookie King, on 24 June 2016 - 05:31 AM, said:

Simple really. There should be a minimum amount of matches played before you show up on the leaderboards.

Perhaps 20 matches?

All these names at the top with 1 match score is just annoying.

Man it's PGI just enjoy they are simply true geniuses.


In fact all variables should be a ratio [variable value]/[number of match] (and of course tie-breaker >> more match is better)

And split QP stats by "pugs match" and "groups match" but wait isn't " best esport in tha world " this way maybe...