

Pgi If You Want To Earn Money Do It Right.
Started by An Innocent Urbie, Jul 20 2016 12:19 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 July 2016 - 12:19 AM
The essence of supply cache as a rare commodity is good but couple it with bad RNG makes someone experience disappointment instead of being rewarded.
If you want to stick with giving supply cache to random winning player at least make the RNG of the supply cache reward less frustrating and disappinting
Or better yet if you want to stick on the RNG distribution of rewards in your supply cache then make it so that all players in the winning team gets to have a supply cache because that means more people will also spend their MC.
If you want to stick with giving supply cache to random winning player at least make the RNG of the supply cache reward less frustrating and disappinting
Or better yet if you want to stick on the RNG distribution of rewards in your supply cache then make it so that all players in the winning team gets to have a supply cache because that means more people will also spend their MC.
#2
Posted 20 July 2016 - 01:37 AM
We do not have enough data at this point, only PGI does. Maybe only those who rolled bad RNG are coming to the forums to complain while those who got decent prize are keeping quiet.

#3
Posted 20 July 2016 - 01:53 AM
its gambling it's always like this, EVERY gambling is a loss and still its one of the things mankind does for millenia.
Won't change here.
Won't change here.
#4
Posted 20 July 2016 - 02:00 AM
Lily from animove, on 20 July 2016 - 01:53 AM, said:
its gambling it's always like this, EVERY gambling is a loss and still its one of the things mankind does for millenia.
Won't change here.
Won't change here.
Yeah, but 10 roles costs the same as a mech pack. It just seems way expensive to me. I don't see it catching on the way it is.
#5
Posted 20 July 2016 - 02:11 AM
El Bandito, on 20 July 2016 - 01:37 AM, said:
We do not have enough data at this point, only PGI does. Maybe only those who rolled bad RNG are coming to the forums to complain while those who got decent prize are keeping quiet. 

Once again Bandito drops the big ol' logic bomb and ends a thread on the second post. Stop it, you're making these guys look bad XD
#10
Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:17 AM
adamts01, on 20 July 2016 - 02:00 AM, said:
Yeah, but 10 roles costs the same as a mech pack. It just seems way expensive to me. I don't see it catching on the way it is.
Seems very cheap to me, especially when you consider many games cost 10 times as much for a role of a dice with much worse odds. This game's supply cache system seems decent to me, free 50k if I don't open it, something worth more than 50k if I do open it for just a little MC I'd just never use anyway.
#11
Posted 20 July 2016 - 03:42 AM
Dakota1000, on 20 July 2016 - 03:17 AM, said:
Seems very cheap to me, especially when you consider many games cost 10 times as much for a role of a dice with much worse odds. This game's supply cache system seems decent to me, free 50k if I don't open it, something worth more than 50k if I do open it for just a little MC I'd just never use anyway.
Yeah, I passed on information from the internet ans was about 400% off target with it. Serves me right. 13 cents isn't bad at all, I guess. I won't ever spend real money on it, but I wouldn't hold it against others.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users