Jump to content

Please Revert The Visual Catapult Ppc Change


47 replies to this topic

Poll: K2 PPC change (179 member(s) have cast votes)

Change/revert the visual PPC change?

  1. Voted Yes (131 votes [73.18%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 73.18%

  2. No (30 votes [16.76%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 16.76%

  3. Abstain (18 votes [10.06%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.06%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Iacov

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 668 posts
  • LocationAustria

Posted 06 November 2013 - 05:14 AM

this thread aims to collect support to ask PGI to revert/alter the visual PPC change to the catapult k2/jester

the new ppcs are smaller than ac2s and look ridiculously small on the catapult 's arm

please /sign this thread (either by casting a vote and/or replying) if you want this visual to be changed or at least want PGI to explain this major alteration to the K2s distinct look

(and because this is a suggestion forum, my suggestion is to revert the PPC visual back or to at least make it thicker/bigger than the current one)

for comparison (and pardon the low resolution - if anyone has better pictures to share, please don't hesitate))
Posted Image
Posted Image

Edited by Iacov, 06 November 2013 - 08:46 AM.


#2 Mechteric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7,308 posts
  • LocationRTP, NC

Posted 06 November 2013 - 06:22 AM

pics for reference?

#3 Iacov

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 668 posts
  • LocationAustria

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:05 AM

View PostCapperDeluxe, on 06 November 2013 - 06:22 AM, said:

pics for reference?

done

#4 Voivode

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hungry
  • The Hungry
  • 1,465 posts

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:07 AM

I'd like to see some in game pics before I make a judgement. Mechlab pics aren't always the best viewpoint.

#5 Iacov

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 668 posts
  • LocationAustria

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:47 AM

done
but couldn't fine any ingame pictures that show it from the side...hope some likeminded players will provide a side-shot, especially from the new barrels

#6 Malleus011

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,854 posts

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:53 AM

I'd support reverting all the changes except the ballistic and laser improvements to the K2 chassis.

The PPCs don't look good, the old ones were better.

The LRM box changes are terrible.

#7 Corvus Antaka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 8,310 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationInner Sphere

Posted 06 November 2013 - 08:54 AM

yup the old ppc visual was better.

#8 Modo44

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • 3,559 posts

Posted 06 November 2013 - 10:03 AM

I actually only dislike the new laser pods.

#9 Prezimonto

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 2,017 posts
  • LocationKufstein FRR

Posted 07 November 2013 - 11:44 AM

eewww... the new set up is ugly.

#10 focuspark

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ardent
  • The Ardent
  • 3,180 posts

Posted 07 November 2013 - 11:44 AM

i'm in-between on the PPC changes. Really not happy about the missile changes.

#11 Fooby

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 49 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 07 November 2013 - 07:52 PM

Well since the Awesome-8Q PPC's look like the old K2's and, and the Awesome's geometry does NOT change, why have multiple PPC models, it looks more like a large laser now.

#12 aniviron

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,752 posts

Posted 07 November 2013 - 08:06 PM

View PostFooby, on 07 November 2013 - 07:52 PM, said:

Well since the Awesome-8Q PPC's look like the old K2's and, and the Awesome's geometry does NOT change, why have multiple PPC models, it looks more like a large laser now.


They're trying to make the models consistent across mechs; and because of the months-long PPC meta that is still persisting somewhat, everyone is strapping 2-3 PPCs onto mechs with wrist-mounted weapons, and you can't fit a big scary PPC barrel onto those; so in the interest of keeping what a PPC looks like consistent, PGI has decided to give older mechs that were designed to carry PPCs the drinking-straw thin models as well. The only problem is that these mechs weren't designed to look good with such a small model, so now they look quite silly.

I dread what's going to happen to the Awesome. They're going to look so very dumb. Those huge gorilla arms supporting tiny little tubes.

#13 Gryphorim

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother
  • 382 posts

Posted 08 November 2013 - 03:38 AM

The old PPC's did look better proportioned. However the new ones are more in line with every other mech post graphics update. I vote to change them back, BUT also re-update every mech to bring them in line with the K2. While they're at it, more dynamic missile boxes for other cats. My LRM5's and SSRM2's don't need the size of an LRM15, and failing that, any less than 15 tubes for all missile launchers per arm, should all fit in the existing bays.

#14 Aiden Skye

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Galaxy Commander II
  • Galaxy Commander II
  • 1,364 posts
  • LocationThe Rock

Posted 08 November 2013 - 01:55 PM

The Old PPC's looked a lot better. The new ones look largely disproportional to the arm...barrels are too small. I like the other new barrels, but the PPC's in the arms need to go back.

#15 Zerberus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 3,488 posts
  • LocationUnder the floorboards looking for the Owner`s Manual

Posted 09 November 2013 - 03:18 AM

Couldn`t care less about the ppcs (I actually like the way they look now), but I do care about the huge addon missile pods that make the `ears an easier target.

I guess I`ll need a second poll becase this is about ppc and ppc only, I need a poll that cares about the hitboxes and not just the looks. :ph34r:

#16 Corralis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 577 posts
  • LocationChesterfield, England

Posted 09 November 2013 - 05:31 AM

Hmm weirdly I like the look of both design's. I get the new design does not look quite as impressive but it still looks good.

#17 Enzane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 428 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationTemplar Command Training Camp.

Posted 09 November 2013 - 06:37 AM

Posted Image

#18 Commissar Aku

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 195 posts

Posted 09 November 2013 - 08:30 AM

Can anyone else say smaller profile? and if you are so unhappy try putting them in the torsos it looks like tusks and really cool. Only if you have a small wang do things need to be bigger remember that.

#19 Cimarb

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Caladbolg
  • Caladbolg
  • 3,912 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationA hop, skip and jump from Terra

Posted 09 November 2013 - 08:44 AM

While I don't personally care about the K2, or other cats, as I'm not skilled enough to survive more than five seconds in one, this is a complaint about what the vast majority of people asked for. Updating the static weapon models on the original/old mechs was pretty much universally requested for a long time. To make them dynamic, they had to compromise somewhere.

#20 Enzane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 428 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationTemplar Command Training Camp.

Posted 10 November 2013 - 07:24 AM

You know. I just noticed.

The PPCs now, look like zoomed out camera lenses. When compared to the old way.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users