We Want Mad Cat Mkii
#21
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:13 PM
Just wait it out guys...wait it out...
#22
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:18 PM
Davers, on 18 October 2016 - 03:07 PM, said:
You know, the Hoplite might actually be interesting. ECM variant, good variety, and it would be interesting to have a mech that, no matter what, only ever has two hard points.
It may not be good, per say, but it would be interesting. And thus, I do not think it is a good contender for the next IS mech.
#23
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:22 PM
#24
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:22 PM
Bombast, on 18 October 2016 - 03:18 PM, said:
You know, the Hoplite might actually be interesting. ECM variant, good variety, and it would be interesting to have a mech that, no matter what, only ever has two hard points.
It may not be good, per say, but it would be interesting. And thus, I do not think it is a good contender for the next IS mech.
An IS mech with hardpoint deficiency? So basically it'll get hardpoint inflation that more than doubles its possible loadout and gets a boatload of quirks thrown at it?
Takes out the interesting part I guess, maybe they could quirk up some stuff to give it a purpose.
#25
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:24 PM
#26
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:49 PM
Ghogiel, on 18 October 2016 - 03:12 PM, said:
Stupid choice because they have lost my support.
So current top mech packs since the cyclops and and all future mech packs I would have kept on buying.
Yeah they have until Dec (That is the deadline I have given, unlike Russ I keep my word and my deadlines.)
#27
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:50 PM
#28
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:52 PM
CK16, on 18 October 2016 - 03:13 PM, said:
Just wait it out guys...wait it out...
Russ also said it was on the cusp and coming out soon in the town hall where he said my name specifically. Next year is not even remotely close to the use of those terms.
So basically I don't believe things he says anymore.
#29
Posted 18 October 2016 - 03:52 PM
#30
Posted 18 October 2016 - 04:06 PM
GRiPSViGiL, on 18 October 2016 - 03:52 PM, said:
This is true that is why my long term goal was single player in Unreal Engine 4.
Like the MK II it's just a dream and dreams never come true.
#31
Posted 18 October 2016 - 04:13 PM
#32
Posted 18 October 2016 - 04:35 PM
This game was supposed to call MECH WARRIOR 5.
So... i think it´s fair enought to bring up the most iconics mechs from MW4, the best game in MechWarrior franchise.
Again.
WE WANT MAD CAT MK2, not timberwolf mk 2 or whatever. I also prefer DAISHI!
#33
Posted 18 October 2016 - 04:45 PM
Rodo, on 18 October 2016 - 04:35 PM, said:
This game was supposed to call MECH WARRIOR 5.
So... i think it´s fair enought to bring up the most iconics mechs from MW4, the best game in MechWarrior franchise.
I see whats happening here.
He liked the burger and fries Mechwarrior game and now wants a diet madcat to go with it.
#35
Posted 18 October 2016 - 04:58 PM
Edited by MauttyKoray, 18 October 2016 - 04:59 PM.
#36
Posted 18 October 2016 - 06:02 PM
The Mk II is much more ballistic and missile based. It is quite faster because its engine cap is at 360xl and I think it can go further (can not tell you right off top of my head). Thats almost 70kph vs the barely 60 of the SNV.
I still believe Russ here, 2017 is the year of the MK II, and hopefully many other nice additions to the game, mechs and game play wise.
#38
Posted 18 October 2016 - 06:32 PM
Game will have 0 server population by the time it comes anyway
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users