Expect Balancing Over The Next Couple Months!
#1
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:09 PM
This could be good. This could also be bad. Those "DPS" pulse lasers tested poorly, right?
I actually wasn't a fan of any of the laser changes honestly, can't we just buff MGs and small lasers and call it square? Maybe LBs and AC2s too?
#2
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:11 PM
#5
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:24 PM
The simple reality is that QP, as it is right now, has consistently proven to be the best game experience PGI is willing and able to provide.
They just have to keep promising (but not delivering) real new and exciting content so people will keep buying (more and more) mech packs.
Which the slowly shrinking population will continue to do because we've consistently shown that we'll buy mech packs in return for the *promise* of good new gameplay even if it's never delivered.
Hard to say who's more to blame in this one.
#6
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:27 PM
#8
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:30 PM

Does it disturb anyone else that, with that wording, they could release balance changes at MechCon and say that was the major announcement they had planned? I'm getting another "small content update" vibe from this...
#11
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:43 PM
30% damage nerfs are not iterative, but at the same time, their Pulse iterations were too minuscule, nothing changed.
The damage changes had to be smaller, and the pulse damage-duration-cooldown had to be larger
Edited by Mcgral18, 26 October 2016 - 05:51 PM.
#12
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:44 PM
Mcgral18, on 26 October 2016 - 05:43 PM, said:
30% damage nerfs are not iterative, but at the same time, their Pulse iterations were to minuscule nothing changed.
The damage changes had to be smaller, and the pulse damage-duration-cooldown had to be larger
I don't think any claim of iterative changes were actually mentioned.
Changes are happening, so another meta change that potatoes will take 60-90 day to recognize will be upon us.
Edited by Deathlike, 26 October 2016 - 05:44 PM.
#13
Posted 26 October 2016 - 05:51 PM
Deathlike, on 26 October 2016 - 05:44 PM, said:
I don't think any claim of iterative changes were actually mentioned.
Changes are happening, so another meta change that potatoes will take 60-90 day to recognize will be upon us.
He said "iteration" when talking about balance changes on the PTS
#15
Posted 26 October 2016 - 08:18 PM
Deathlike, on 26 October 2016 - 05:11 PM, said:
Quick! Get a t-shirt made for MECHCON!! THE DARTBOARD of DESTINY:
Edited by TLBFestus, 26 October 2016 - 08:18 PM.
#16
Posted 26 October 2016 - 08:39 PM
MischiefSC, on 26 October 2016 - 05:24 PM, said:
Well Russ Said in a Town Hall that Solaris would not happen until after an engine upgrade, so unless they are announing and engine upgrade at the same time ... then I would not get my hopes up for Solaris.
#18
Posted 26 October 2016 - 09:53 PM
#19
Posted 26 October 2016 - 09:59 PM
DGTLDaemon, on 26 October 2016 - 09:53 PM, said:
Such as... ? Cause I agree with some of the PTS balance changes, like the AC5 heat increase and LRM20 buffs.
Edited by El Bandito, 26 October 2016 - 10:03 PM.
#20
Posted 26 October 2016 - 10:00 PM
N0ni, on 26 October 2016 - 05:39 PM, said:
Why does anyone care about the gold mechs, let alone object to them in principle? There was not only nothing wrong with them, either in concept or in execution, but they were a fine idea that did the job reasonably well. It's one of the best routes for F2P games to monetize super-whales by offering super expensive cosmetic-only options in limited quantities. I never understood the QQ when they were announced, and I understand even less how there could still be QQ flowing from it yet today.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
























