Kmieciu, on 15 November 2016 - 05:39 AM, said:
Me neither. And I'm one of those foolish enough to mount UAC20 on a Hellbringer.
It's very satisfying to sneak up on somebody using ECM then dump 40 UAC damage + 30 damage from 6xERSL right into their CT. And I can speak from experience that double-taping the UAC20 is quicker than the duration of ERSL.
I love that config. I have 2 variations of this config, either 6 SPLas, or 4 MLas.
Last night, my UAC20 jammed. And while I had CT cored a KDK3, I couldn't finish him off as the UAC20 unjam time is so long. Now its gonna be even longer... Good bye UAC20. I could put up with your spread. I could put up with your heat. But now when you don't talk to me for over 10 seconds, I can't take it anymore... It was fun while it lasted.
Arkhangel, on 15 November 2016 - 10:29 AM, said:
In all honesty, all these pages show... is people should really try to just load out balanced builds, rather than go for the current meta. get some diversity out there. it's good for the game, regardless of what some of you seem to think.
If you rely on one weapon system so much you're utterly boned when it changes... maybe, you know.... don't just rely on a one-trick pony build.
...
So, how do you not rely on a UAC20 when you are using it? Its so damned big, so damned heavy, any backup weapons pales in comparison. I really don't think anyone brings a single UAC20 and no backup weapons.
Lets clear this up: Most of the complaints is around the effective nerf of using 1 or maybe 2 UACs. In the case of the UAC20, singular use of it just died. If you talk about config diversity, the change in this patch just killed some.