25 replies to this topic

[Tier5 Kerensky]

Sorry, my mistake, I tested them and I was mistaken.

Edited by Teer Kerensky, 14 November 2016 - 08:41 PM.

[Felicitatem Parco]

I just updated the thread title to forget about jam rates. I wihld like to see the in-game data once someone can patch it up.

Any updates from the community would be appreciated.

[Mcgral18]

El Bandito, on 14 November 2016 - 06:06 PM, said:

The 6% value is from PTS server. UAC2 jam chance had been 14% for a long time. PGI simply got confused in the patch notes.

Well, depending which iteration
This was the last PTS session

<WeaponStats maxDepth="10.0" gravity="0,0,-9.8" volleydelay="0.11" speed="2000" lifetime="10.0" duration="0.0" tons="5" maxRange="1620" longRange="810" minRange="0" ammoPerShot="1" ammoType="ClanUltraAC2Ammo" cooldown="0.83" heat="0.8" impulse="0.03" EnergyDraw="2.0" damage="2" numFiring="1" projectileclass="bullet" type="Ballistic" slots="2" Health="10" critChanceIncrease="0.06,0.03,0.01" critDamMult="1.0" JammedTime="2.3" JammingChance="0.17" ShotsDuringCooldown="1"/>

17% there

[Alexander Garden]

C-UAC/2 Jam Chance originally listed in the notes was indeed a typo; Jam Chance is going from 14% to 17%.
C-UAC/2s are not receiving any change to Heat in this patch.

The Design Note from the AC/LBX section referencing 'the...AC/2 line' is referring to IS and Clan AC/2s specifically. The UACs have their own section and Design Notes.

[Felicitatem Parco]

Alexander Garden, on 15 November 2016 - 11:12 AM, said:

C-UAC/2 Jam Chance originally listed in the notes was indeed a typo; Jam Chance is going from 14% to 17%.
C-UAC/2s are not receiving any change to Heat in this patch.

The Design Note from the AC/LBX section referencing 'the...AC/2 line' is referring to IS and Clan AC/2s specifically. The UACs have their own section and Design Notes.

Thanks!!

[Felicitatem Parco]

I do wish that CUAC/2 got some heat reduction, though. They are not much much cooler than ERSLs.

Edited by Prosperity Park, 15 November 2016 - 11:50 AM.