What Even Was The Japanese Battletech?
#1
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:39 PM
Hermes II
Archer
Hunchback
Dragon
Panther
Chameleon
I know the Japanese are all into this curvy, smooth, bulbous design for their mechs, but come on FASA. That's just offensive.
#2
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:41 PM
EDIT: Also, offensive? ***** sake.
Edited by Bombast, 06 December 2016 - 08:43 PM.
#3
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:44 PM
Also offensive? How so? I do not catch your conversation ball.
Also alas, why MWO Phoenix Hawk no look like (it is epic!):
Edited by Gaden Phoenix, 06 December 2016 - 08:47 PM.
#4
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:44 PM
Edited by El Bandito, 06 December 2016 - 08:45 PM.
#5
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:44 PM
Sales, Safety, Laws, Consumer Reasons, Materials available, aesthetics...
The list really can go on forever.
Edited by Revis Volek, 06 December 2016 - 08:44 PM.
#6
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:45 PM
#7
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:46 PM
If you dont like them, dont look at them, posting them on this forum is just a troll bait post.
#10
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:49 PM
Brenden, on 06 December 2016 - 08:45 PM, said:
Some of the original artwork from the first editions of battletech were purchased from a company that claimed they owned the rights to the art in the US. The story of how that turned out is a **** show for another time.
What that means here, however, is that FASA didn't have the rights to some of their mechs in Japan because of the artwork, so they had to redo them, and they did some of the original ones as well for consistency.
#11
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:52 PM
Gaden Phoenix, on 06 December 2016 - 08:44 PM, said:
Also offensive? How so? I do not catch your conversation ball.
Also alas, why MWO Phoenix Hawk no look like (it is epic!):
Sadly no, this I came across a long time ago while looking for Sarna.
Bombast, on 06 December 2016 - 08:49 PM, said:
Some of the original artwork from the first editions of battletech were purchased from a company that claimed they owned the rights to the art in the US. The story of how that turned out is a **** show for another time.
What that means here, however, is that FASA didn't have the rights to some of their mechs in Japan because of the artwork, so they had to redo them, and they did some of the original ones as well for consistency.
Alright for consistency I can understand, but did the Stalker - AKA The Blimp - really have to undergo THIS much plastic surgery?
#12
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:53 PM
El Bandito, on 06 December 2016 - 08:46 PM, said:
Original designs are too ugly and sluggish for modern Japanese tastes. Form > function.
What? Form > Function... Those Japanese Mechs are so overpowered.
They can fly at the speed of light, transform and ****. Also deflect laser beams
#14
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:56 PM
#15
Posted 06 December 2016 - 08:57 PM
Gaden Phoenix, on 06 December 2016 - 08:53 PM, said:
What? Form > Function... Those Japanese Mechs are so overpowered.
They can fly at the speed of light, transform and ****. Also deflect laser beams
And this is why I don't like Japanese Mecha anime. Nothing seems grounded in realism.
Bombast, on 06 December 2016 - 08:55 PM, said:
I guess you didn't so much want answers, but just to *****.
Have fun with that.
Damn right.
Lyoto Machida, on 06 December 2016 - 08:56 PM, said:
Yes!
Lyoto Machida, on 06 December 2016 - 08:56 PM, said:
http://www.gearsonli...ies/battletech/
#16
Posted 06 December 2016 - 09:02 PM
Lyoto Machida, on 06 December 2016 - 08:56 PM, said:
Yes and no.
FASA contracted someone else to make them, so yes, it's official work. But it's non-canon and I don't think actually owned by Catalyst, so they're kind of treated as 'Unseen.' Their actually legal status is beyond me, though my guess is that neither the guys who drew them, nor Catalyst, give a **** about them.
#17
Posted 06 December 2016 - 09:06 PM
Bombast, on 06 December 2016 - 09:02 PM, said:
Yes and no.
FASA contracted someone else to make them, so yes, it's official work. But it's non-canon and I don't think actually owned by Catalyst, so they're kind of treated as 'Unseen.' Their actually legal status is beyond me, though my guess is that neither the guys who drew them, nor Catalyst, give a **** about them.
Legal or not, at least the Spider finally looks good in some form.
#18
Posted 06 December 2016 - 09:08 PM
Lyoto Machida, on 06 December 2016 - 08:56 PM, said:
Battletech is actually the postal child of "re-interpretation". The mechs of Battle Tech Mmechs have modified forms so many times... what is the real design?
Even when you compare old Battletech lore books to new Battletech lore books to Mechwarrior series to MWO. They are all re-interpretations.
Like how America changes all ethnicities of heroes in movies to white, like how Superman costume and looks always change, etc. Battletech Mech design changes to suit the new designer, the audience and the times.
Edited by Gaden Phoenix, 06 December 2016 - 09:09 PM.
#19
Posted 06 December 2016 - 09:08 PM
Brenden, on 06 December 2016 - 08:57 PM, said:
I don't know what you're talking about, Evangelion is totally realistic! Geometry kills!
Edited by RestosIII, 06 December 2016 - 09:09 PM.
#20
Posted 06 December 2016 - 09:10 PM
All hail our Lord and Mech Father, Shoji Kawamori!
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users