Real Mech :)
#1
Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:48 AM
#2
Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:50 AM
Probably gonna be piloted by a Starcraft champion.
Edited by El Bandito, 17 December 2016 - 08:56 AM.
#3
Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM
#4
Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM
Does the hero variant have ECM at least?
Edited by Snazzy Dragon, 17 December 2016 - 08:53 AM.
#5
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:03 AM
#6
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM
#7
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:18 AM
RestosIII, on 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM, said:
I'm reminded of the scene in Iron Man 2 where Tony Stark shows everyone what the 'Axis of Evil' power's attempts at an Iron Man suit look like, and the North Korean one takes two steps, falls down, then machine guns all the friendly soldiers standing around it.
Wish I could find a not ****** clip for show and tell.
Edited by Bombast, 17 December 2016 - 09:18 AM.
#8
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:22 AM
#9
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:29 AM
#10
Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:34 AM
#11
Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:01 AM
jss78, on 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM, said:
They could build exoskeletons back in the 50's. The main issue is power.
#12
Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:12 AM
#13
Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:17 AM
Just don't ever expect walking tanks.
#14
Posted 19 December 2016 - 04:34 AM
jss78, on 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM, said:
Yeah, I think the real engineering challenge is no longer the motion of the legs, but the internal power source.. We still have no batteries that could power such a large mech for any extended period of time..
#15
Posted 19 December 2016 - 04:44 AM
Vellron2005, on 19 December 2016 - 04:34 AM, said:
Yeah, I think the real engineering challenge is no longer the motion of the legs, but the internal power source.. We still have no batteries that could power such a large mech for any extended period of time..
Fusion reactors might be a thing in a very near future
http://gizmodo.com/m...re-t-1787891931
Unless they get tangled in bureaucracy and scientists got their funding cut, cause we "need" to spend money on some ******** ****, like 76+ gender acceptance, building a wall, subsidizing oil companies.. you name it. So much money is wasted that's beyond criminal.
#16
Posted 19 December 2016 - 07:41 AM
#17
Posted 19 December 2016 - 07:47 AM
DovisKhan, on 19 December 2016 - 04:44 AM, said:
Fusion reactors might be a thing in a very near future
http://gizmodo.com/m...re-t-1787891931
Unless they get tangled in bureaucracy and scientists got their funding cut, cause we "need" to spend money on some ******** ****, like 76+ gender acceptance, building a wall, subsidizing oil companies.. you name it. So much money is wasted that's beyond criminal.
I think you may've misunderstood the engineering challenge. Fusion reactors will be nice, as power plants, but I don't see them being A. Compact enough to place in an exoskeleton or reasonably sized mech and B. Miniature nuclear bombs walking around? That won't raise some serious issues.
#18
Posted 19 December 2016 - 08:40 AM
https://mwomercs.com...1-manned-robot/
Edited by GrimRiver, 19 December 2016 - 08:56 AM.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users