Jump to content

Real Mech :)


17 replies to this topic

#1 Revener

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 223 posts
  • LocationSvea Rike

Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:48 AM

https://www.facebook...?type=3

#2 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:50 AM

Yep. Made a thread about it before. Koreans are straight up going for the bipedal route. Posted Image

Probably gonna be piloted by a Starcraft champion.

Posted Image

Edited by El Bandito, 17 December 2016 - 08:56 AM.


#3 RestosIII

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,322 posts
  • LocationDelios

Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM

So... any bets on how many years it will take for North Korea to try and copy the design, but with ropes and levers that the pilot has to pull?

#4 Snazzy Dragon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Defiant
  • The Defiant
  • 2,912 posts
  • LocationRUNNING FAST AND TURNING LEFT

Posted 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM

That thing will have atrocious hitboxes and it'll be easy to headshot. DOA

Does the hero variant have ECM at least?

Edited by Snazzy Dragon, 17 December 2016 - 08:53 AM.


#5 Shiroi Tsuki

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 1,205 posts
  • LocationCosplaying Ruby from Rwby in Aiur, Auckland, GA America, Interior Union, Mar Sara and Remnant

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:03 AM

Just look at those, unarmored and very exposed legs

Posted Image

#6 jss78

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,575 posts
  • LocationHelsinki

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM

Looking at the way that thing already moves (=astonishingly well), I have a feeling the biggest hurdle in getting "real" mechs will be developing an internal power source that the machine can actually operate on.

#7 Bombast

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 7,709 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:18 AM

View PostRestosIII, on 17 December 2016 - 08:52 AM, said:

So... any bets on how many years it will take for North Korea to try and copy the design, but with ropes and levers that the pilot has to pull?


I'm reminded of the scene in Iron Man 2 where Tony Stark shows everyone what the 'Axis of Evil' power's attempts at an Iron Man suit look like, and the North Korean one takes two steps, falls down, then machine guns all the friendly soldiers standing around it.

Wish I could find a not ****** clip for show and tell.

Edited by Bombast, 17 December 2016 - 09:18 AM.


#8 cazidin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 4,259 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:22 AM

That mech will need a LOT of quirks to be competitive, and even then the hard points will be too few and too low.

#9 Novakaine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 5,715 posts
  • LocationThe Republic of Texas

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:29 AM

That's the way my IS mechs feel now.

#10 JediPanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,086 posts
  • LocationLost in my C1

Posted 17 December 2016 - 09:34 AM

I'll be worried when some one makes five robot quads or a stinger lam. Imagine if pgi were to get into weapons development. Nerf's stock would be worth billions and every one would be fighting like black friday at wal mart to get any thing nerf.

#11 Vonbach

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 697 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:01 AM

View Postjss78, on 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM, said:

Looking at the way that thing already moves (=astonishingly well), I have a feeling the biggest hurdle in getting "real" mechs will be developing an internal power source that the machine can actually operate on.

They could build exoskeletons back in the 50's. The main issue is power.

#12 Battlemaster56

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Pack Leader
  • Pack Leader
  • 2,843 posts
  • LocationOn the not so distant moon on Endor

Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:12 AM

Wait ain't America and Japan already builds mechs already, com'on Korea gotta pick up the pace!!

#13 Vonbach

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 697 posts

Posted 17 December 2016 - 11:17 AM

We have robots that can walk and also experimental exoskeletons.
Just don't ever expect walking tanks.

#14 Vellron2005

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Blood-Eye
  • The Blood-Eye
  • 5,444 posts
  • LocationIn the mechbay, telling the techs to put extra LRM ammo on.

Posted 19 December 2016 - 04:34 AM

View Postjss78, on 17 December 2016 - 09:16 AM, said:

Looking at the way that thing already moves (=astonishingly well), I have a feeling the biggest hurdle in getting "real" mechs will be developing an internal power source that the machine can actually operate on.


Yeah, I think the real engineering challenge is no longer the motion of the legs, but the internal power source.. We still have no batteries that could power such a large mech for any extended period of time..

#15 DovisKhan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 872 posts

Posted 19 December 2016 - 04:44 AM

View PostVellron2005, on 19 December 2016 - 04:34 AM, said:


Yeah, I think the real engineering challenge is no longer the motion of the legs, but the internal power source.. We still have no batteries that could power such a large mech for any extended period of time..


Fusion reactors might be a thing in a very near future

http://gizmodo.com/m...re-t-1787891931


Unless they get tangled in bureaucracy and scientists got their funding cut, cause we "need" to spend money on some ******** ****, like 76+ gender acceptance, building a wall, subsidizing oil companies.. you name it. So much money is wasted that's beyond criminal.

#16 Radbane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • LocationSweden

Posted 19 December 2016 - 07:41 AM

"Baby steps" I guess... litteraly =)

'Coz it looks something like this https://vimeo.com/26500378

#17 cazidin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 4,259 posts

Posted 19 December 2016 - 07:47 AM

View PostDovisKhan, on 19 December 2016 - 04:44 AM, said:


Fusion reactors might be a thing in a very near future

http://gizmodo.com/m...re-t-1787891931


Unless they get tangled in bureaucracy and scientists got their funding cut, cause we "need" to spend money on some ******** ****, like 76+ gender acceptance, building a wall, subsidizing oil companies.. you name it. So much money is wasted that's beyond criminal.


I think you may've misunderstood the engineering challenge. Fusion reactors will be nice, as power plants, but I don't see them being A. Compact enough to place in an exoskeleton or reasonably sized mech and B. Miniature nuclear bombs walking around? That won't raise some serious issues.

#18 GrimRiver

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 1,306 posts
  • LocationIf not here and not there, then where?

Posted 19 December 2016 - 08:40 AM

I've made a post about this too, but it got moved.

https://mwomercs.com...1-manned-robot/

Edited by GrimRiver, 19 December 2016 - 08:56 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users