

#1
Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:33 AM
Anybody else notice this?
#2
Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:34 AM
I played it today.
Plenty.
Gets voted all the time.
#3
Posted 28 December 2016 - 08:57 AM
#4
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:01 AM
#6
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:07 AM
Belacose, on 28 December 2016 - 11:01 AM, said:
People like it, or at least the consistent voting for it would seem to suggest that they do.
So of course it would only be reasonable to pull it from rotation. By god you WILL admire the trees and fog of other maps.
#7
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:10 AM
#8
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:13 AM
#9
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:22 AM
JackalBeast, on 28 December 2016 - 11:10 AM, said:
Polar Highlands, on the other hand, was in vogue. Especially Escort. I have no idea why people like Escort on Polar so much, similar to how I can't fathom why so many like Domination on Alpine...
#10
Posted 28 December 2016 - 11:30 AM
Is there Escort on Canyon Network? If not, that may explain why.
#11
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:03 PM
PurplePuke, on 28 December 2016 - 08:33 AM, said:
Anybody else notice this?
This is odd because I'm getting sick of playing it. Canyon and Crimson straight have been my two most common maps for the past three days.Actually had three canyon dominations in a row followed by a Crimson straight skirmish only to get a canyon conquest next match.
North American Server if that maters.
#12
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:07 PM
Yeonne Greene, on 28 December 2016 - 11:22 AM, said:
Polar Highlands, on the other hand, was in vogue. Especially Escort. I have no idea why people like Escort on Polar so much, similar to how I can't fathom why so many like Domination on Alpine...
I like Escort on Polar for two reasons.
The ECM tower placements make them less effective for either side removing the annoying "magic" effects from the match.
The map is large enough to pull some interesting mauvers as defenders. Allowing you the space to fake out the enemy mechs and draw them away from the VIP. Smaller maps don't really give you much option other than a roving murderball tactic.
#13
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:11 PM
My votes usually go out to HPG, Canyon, Mining, and Tourmaline.
My votes are never for forest colony or polar highlands; I personally feel they are the worst designs and bring out some of the worst playstyles I've seen of any "tactical" shooter.
#14
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:12 PM
NRP, on 28 December 2016 - 11:13 AM, said:
I vote it most times it's available. I virtually never run LRM's. It's an interesting map to me, no matter what build I'm running.
Edited by jss78, 28 December 2016 - 03:17 PM.
#15
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:15 PM
Snazzy Dragon, on 28 December 2016 - 03:11 PM, said:
[...]
Now that you mention it ... I noticed that, too.
#16
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:53 PM
Although i am not a big fan or a big hater of Escort, i would much rather play Canyon and HPG Skirmish 20 times in a row than the current map/mode pool, which was yesterday (for me) either Crimson Escort or Frozen City Assault.
#17
Posted 28 December 2016 - 03:57 PM
skelley92, on 28 December 2016 - 11:30 AM, said:
Is there Escort on Canyon Network? If not, that may explain why.
That's the issue. I'm also getting Alpine Peaks a lot less than before. It was never hugely popular, but now I don't even get to vote for it, due to Escort game mode.
You only get to vote for Canyon, Alpine, Viridian Bog and HPG Manifold if Escort is not an option. This kind of limits which maps get voted for whenever Escort is not an option.
HPG Manifold is still 90% of my matches, feels like.
#18
Posted 28 December 2016 - 04:59 PM
4 months ago, 80% of games were Skirmish on Mining/HPG so this past week has been quite good for me in terms of variety.
Personally, I pick the mode first then decide to either up my chance on my preferred map or farm multiplier.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users