Jump to content

Bushwacker Size?


13 replies to this topic

#1 Karamanthos

    Member

  • Pip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 15 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:20 PM

tried it out a few times now....

why PGI? why did you make the Bushwacker fatter and taller than 70-75 tonner heavies?

its bigger than the catapult 65t, hellbringer 65t, timberwolf 75t, its as tall as the Warhammer 70t and again bigger than the linebacker 75t...so uhm...why? just why? is this thing filled with helium to bloat it all out of proportions? but never should anything 55t, be larger than anything in 75t weight class...the damn thing needs a huge rescale.

#2 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:21 PM

Uh, the Marauder towers over this thing...

#3 Tyler Valentine

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Senior Corporal
  • 1,472 posts
  • LocationChandler, Arizona

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:27 PM

It's not that big. Size seems about right to me.

#4 Champion of Khorne Lord of Blood

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 4,806 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:30 PM

Linebacker is 60 tons, and bigger than the Bushwacker.

#5 naterist

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 6
  • Mercenary Rank 6
  • 1,724 posts
  • Location7th circle of hell

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:36 PM

its taller because of that launcher and its associated tower. that thing is tall and big, its got mad-2c big booty syndrome.

#6 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:42 PM

Has to be mastered and outfitted with a good load out and practice to do well in. I had a lot of trouble getting my Phoenix Hawk having good scores, took forever. When in doubt boat lasers. Use a standard for anything under 115 kph.

Edited by Johnny Z, 24 January 2017 - 08:43 PM.


#7 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:43 PM

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image

Dunno what the OP is going on about.

#8 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 24 January 2017 - 08:44 PM

Yep the Bushwacker is tough. Very hard to get a ct hit anywhere but from directly in front.

Using a standard it will be slow, get used to it and wait for engine balancing update.

Edited by Johnny Z, 24 January 2017 - 08:47 PM.


#9 Cabusha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 533 posts
  • LocationAK

Posted 24 January 2017 - 10:00 PM

It's basically a small Ebon Jag. OP is probably confusing cockpit perspective.

Edited by Cabusha, 24 January 2017 - 10:01 PM.


#10 process

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Star Colonel II
  • Star Colonel II
  • 1,667 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 10:15 PM

In actual Battletech scale it probably should be bigger and a little wider, but for balance sake it appears to be appropriately sized.

#11 DovisKhan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 872 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 11:10 PM

View PostJohnny Z, on 24 January 2017 - 08:42 PM, said:

Has to be mastered and outfitted with a good load out and practice to do well in. I had a lot of trouble getting my Phoenix Hawk having good scores, took forever. When in doubt boat lasers. Use a standard for anything under 115 kph.


It only requires a good build, it's very forgiving tho, since you can take loads of damage if you twist, best medium mech hitboxes, feels like a tank after piloting a Huntsman


I dropped in stock, with crappy lrms and such and got pathetic damage, like aroun 100 pathetic


My first drop in a decent 3 ac2 + 3 srm2 build netted me 5 kills and ~650 dmg, with some practice it's a medium you should consistently do 500+ damage in with multiple kills

View PostKaramanthos, on 24 January 2017 - 08:20 PM, said:

tried it out a few times now....

why PGI? why did you make the Bushwacker fatter and taller than 70-75 tonner heavies?

its bigger than the catapult 65t, hellbringer 65t, timberwolf 75t, its as tall as the Warhammer 70t and again bigger than the linebacker 75t...so uhm...why? just why? is this thing filled with helium to bloat it all out of proportions? but never should anything 55t, be larger than anything in 75t weight class...the damn thing needs a huge rescale.


I like that it's big


I wish Urbanmech was much bigger, with how slow it is it doesn't make sense for it to be so small

#12 KuroNyra

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,990 posts
  • LocationIdiot's Crater.

Posted 24 January 2017 - 11:44 PM

View PostDovisKhan, on 24 January 2017 - 11:10 PM, said:

I wish Urbanmech was much bigger, with how slow it is it doesn't make sense for it to be so small

It does, it has the smallest engine possible. One that is less powerful than your Fiat or your Volkswagen. :P

#13 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 24 January 2017 - 11:50 PM

The Bushwacker's size is fine. It's shape however remains to be desired.

It's not Shaqhawk tall or Kintaro-sized worth of jolly.

Relative to other 55-tonners, it's undersized... but that's because most 55-tonners are huge.

#14 Curccu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 4,623 posts

Posted 25 January 2017 - 12:43 AM

View PostKuroNyra, on 24 January 2017 - 11:44 PM, said:

It does, it has the smallest engine possible. One that is less powerful than your Fiat or your Volkswagen. Posted Image

Load your Fiat with 29 tons of cargo and see if it goes faster than urbie... ;)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users