

How Racs Should Have Been
#1
Posted 06 July 2017 - 08:02 PM
#2
Posted 06 July 2017 - 09:06 PM
#3
Posted 06 July 2017 - 09:22 PM
#4
Posted 07 July 2017 - 02:10 AM
(to get the part move to 4m47s and 5m04s)
Edited by lazytopaz, 07 July 2017 - 02:12 AM.
#5
Posted 07 July 2017 - 02:41 AM
#6
Posted 07 July 2017 - 02:43 AM

#7
Posted 08 July 2017 - 07:50 AM
#8
Posted 08 July 2017 - 08:55 AM
#9
Posted 09 July 2017 - 03:58 PM
Alternatively, the subsequent shots from RACs make the crosshairs bounce around like the mech was getting hit with enemy fire, except of course minus the damage and view obscuring explosions. Doesn't the Heavy Gauss use a similar mechanic?
#10
Posted 09 July 2017 - 04:46 PM
RAC's...
Have you ever youtubed the CIWS (Phalanx weapon system)? If not, go do that.
6 barrels, high speed, shredding machine.
Can I have that? And no not my AMS.
#11
Posted 11 July 2017 - 04:41 AM
Edited by Anjian, 11 July 2017 - 04:42 AM.
#12
Posted 16 July 2017 - 07:15 PM
#13
Posted 16 July 2017 - 07:20 PM
#14
Posted 16 July 2017 - 09:55 PM
(Sorry about the link. I have no clue how to embed >.>)
Edited by Tyroki, 16 July 2017 - 10:00 PM.
#16
Posted 16 July 2017 - 11:05 PM
Quote
Why? there is literally no reason to stop firing before RAC jams. Because you just do less damage than an AC5.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users