Radar deprivation and map knowledge. Both cost zero tons and are better than AMS. Yes, even on polar highlands.
2
A Question For Players: No Ams, Why?
Started by WolvesX, Feb 14 2017 11:22 AM
109 replies to this topic
#102
-
-
- Moderate Giver
- 1,143 posts
Member
Posted 17 February 2017 - 02:47 AM
fat4eyes, on 17 February 2017 - 02:18 AM, said:
Radar deprivation and map knowledge. Both cost zero tons and are better than AMS. Yes, even on polar highlands.
My Kitfox with three AMS, empowered by overload, and ECM suite is also far better than having both Radar deprivation and map knowledge!
In seriousness, unless I play lights and assaults, I sometimes even skip radar deprivation. You just know where are the hard cover and... map knowledge in general.
Edited by The Lighthouse, 17 February 2017 - 02:48 AM.
#103
-
-
- Knight Errant
- 159 posts
Member
Posted 17 February 2017 - 08:22 AM
1. I prefer to use that weight to increase my firepower
2. If I see [incoming missile] I immediately hug a building or worst case scenario an assault mech (sorry)
2. If I see [incoming missile] I immediately hug a building or worst case scenario an assault mech (sorry)
#104
-
-
- The Sureshot
- 10,282 posts
Member
- LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses
Posted 17 February 2017 - 08:59 AM
The Lighthouse, on 17 February 2017 - 02:47 AM, said:
My Kitfox with three AMS, empowered by overload, and ECM suite is also far better than having both Radar deprivation and map knowledge!
In seriousness, unless I play lights and assaults, I sometimes even skip radar deprivation. You just know where are the hard cover and... map knowledge in general.
Don't forget ablative cover too... also known as taller mechs.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
