Jump to content

Removing Lrm Indirect Fire + Buff? Or Lrm Buffs With Los?(Poll)

Started by Andi Nagasia, Feb 18 2017 09:01 PM

No replies to this topic

Poll: Removing Lrm Indirect Fire + Buff? Or Lrm Buffs With Los?(Poll) (141 member(s) have cast votes)

Your Thoughts?

  1. Remove nonTag/NARC/UAV Indirect Fire, then Buff LRMs, (21 votes [14.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.89%

  2. Keep Indirect Fire, but Buff LRMs when Target is in LineOfSight, (94 votes [66.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 66.67%

  3. Keep LRMs as they are, No Change needed, (26 votes [18.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.44%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Andi Nagasia

    Volunteer Moderator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 5,982 posts

Posted 18 February 2017 - 09:01 PM

as the Topic States,
would you support


=Removing LRMs Ability to Fire Indirectly=
in this Case you would no longer be able to Fire LRMs indirectly,
(use of Utility Such as Tag, NARC and UAV would be the Exception)
perhaps adding in C3(1Crit 1Ton) to MWO would help balance this,
-
this may also improve Light Roles,
as Lights would be Needed to allow Indirect fire,
aiding Role Warfare and giving lights more use,


or
=Buff LRMs when use with LOS(LineOfSight)=
the compromise would be keeping Indirect Fire but Buffing LRMs when shot with LineOfSight,
this could be a Spread Buff or a Velocity Buff, and then balanced accordingly,


=(Topic)=

Thoughts, Comments, Concerns?
Thanks,

Edit- Spelling,

Edited by Andi Nagasia, 28 February 2017 - 02:44 PM.

Back to Feature Suggestions · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users