3 replies to this topic

[Ruar]

Imagine if a school decided the lunches needed to be changed.

School- All lunches will now be required to have one of three sauces on all items. Sauce choices are soy, ghost pepper, or extra sour lemon. All students are required to use a minimum of one sauce. Two sauces are required in order to get a drink or dessert. Cafeteria servers will determine the correct amount of sauce to be used for each entree item.

Students- Sauces could be a good way of providing some extra flavor, but why do they have to be tied to our drinks and dessert. Let us choose which sauce we prefer and have some say so in which flavors are used. Only a small fraction of the student body likes ghost pepper, can we please swap that out for gravy instead. Here, a list of suggestions from the student body on how to make this work. Here, polls showing the most popular sauce flavors.

School- After hearing your feedback we've decided that you can now pick how much sauce is applied to each item but a minimum of one tablespoon has to be used. Drinks are no longer tied to a two sauce minimum, but dessert requires all three sauces to be used.

Students- That's not what we said. Why can't you listen to us? We are fine with having sauces at lunch, but let us have more say in how that sauce is applied and can we please have some input in which sauces are chosen. Look at all the feedback and discussion we've had about this. We gave you tons of suggestions... why aren't they being used?

School- We have heard your feedback and are happy to announce the great sauce party of 2017 will happen in two weeks. Based on your feedback we will add a fourth "mystery" sauce as an option but now you have to try all four sauces in order to get a dessert. Thank you for working with us through this difficult transition.

Students- We are done buying school lunch, time to figure out some other way to enjoy eating lunch.

Random student 0145- I love this school, I love the principle. Why can't you guys see the glory of the great sauce party 2017? You guys can never be happy. Please, please, force me to eat the sauces.


That's change. It's also change that ends up with everyone bringing in their lunch because no one likes how the sauces were implemented. It's also pretty reflective of how it's felt to provide feedback from both test periods and then see how this feedback was mostly ignored.

[Felicitatem Parco]

Ruar, on 14 March 2017 - 08:37 AM, said:

. It's also pretty reflective of how it's felt to provide feedback from both test periods and then see how this feedback was mostly ignored.

Feedback regarding the strengths of the trees, costs of unlocks, and UI deficiencies were heard and being addressed. That is why they reduced prices, improved the JJ tree, merged weapon trees, and postponed implementation until the UI is improved.

What are you on?

Edited by Prosperity Park, 14 March 2017 - 09:00 AM.

[El Bandito]

At this stage I would simply shut up until PGI shows us what they changed in the next PTS. They already have plenty of feedbacks.

[1Grimbane]

wow so for the millionth time since there are so many threads about the skill tree abortion pgi wanted to roll out: i hope it never once see the light of day. keep the 3 variant rule as is and f-off