Jump to content

To Annihilate Or Not To Annihilate

BattleMechs

26 replies to this topic

#21 Beaching Betty

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • FP Veteran - Beta 2
  • 710 posts
  • Location-

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:06 AM

NOSTALGIC is the reason why you need to buy it. Dont care about how bad it will be, just look at that thing, it's so powerful!

#22 Snazzy Dragon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Defiant
  • The Defiant
  • 2,912 posts
  • LocationRUNNING FAST AND TURNING LEFT

Posted 13 April 2017 - 01:16 AM

View PostAndi Nagasia, on 12 April 2017 - 02:43 PM, said:

i would like to remind you not to make fun of MechaGodzilla

Confirmed Picture of all Gray Annihilator with 4RAC5 + 4ERMLs,

Posted Image


If only

#23 4b4dd0n

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The God
  • The God
  • 87 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 02:03 AM

What a question.... TO ANNIHILATE!!!!! for sure. Don’t Listen to the Naysayers!!

Some guys pointed already out. Racs RACS and moar RACS. Or do you like gauss? Take some light gauss, normal gauss or HEAVY gauss. Mix it up and if pgi is friendly you can shoot 2 light gauss with 2 normal/heavy gauss at the same time, boom^^

You dont like ballistic take the 8 energy variant with our brand new er LL builds. Which dont suck cause its IS tech and your burning times are short as hell!!!!!
Mix it up with brand new ppcs tech and you will melt faces!!!!!

You think energy is lame and fits not your style? Then take the hero for the ultimate "300 fighting in the shades" MRM 160 playstyle. Nobody will see the sun if you open fire. Pin point damage is for the weak, the new era of spread damage arrives in july!!!!

I hope I could help you to annihilate. And now buy the package and trample on your foes with 48kp/h and laugh about their lamentation.



p.s. im maybe a little bias to the annihilator cause of mw3 Posted Image

#24 Widowmaker1981

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 5,032 posts
  • LocationAt the other end of the pretty lights.

Posted 13 April 2017 - 02:44 AM

Well.. im interested. Engine cap is low, but really heavy IS dakka loadouts need a small engine to fit, and no other mech in the pipeline or already out can even consider builds like 4xUAC10 or 4xRAC5 with heatsinks (since they might be hot), or 5UAC5 or 6AC5

The geometry might not really be any worse than the Dire - yeah distance from cockpit to weapons is far, which will make it uncomfortable to play, but at least it can peek a ridge and back out if its bad. A dire is committed before its even seen whats there.

Edited by Widowmaker1981, 13 April 2017 - 02:49 AM.


#25 Valhallan

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 484 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 02:55 AM

it will live or die on RACS, heavy gauss will not be a thing because it will force you into a STD. Regular unquirked ac's are bleh.

#26 Widowmaker1981

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 5,032 posts
  • LocationAt the other end of the pretty lights.

Posted 13 April 2017 - 03:07 AM

View PostValhallan, on 13 April 2017 - 02:55 AM, said:

it will live or die on RACS, heavy gauss will not be a thing because it will force you into a STD. Regular unquirked ac's are bleh.


I think you underestimate the potential of 6xAC5 and 5xUAC5, tbh.

I also think it will be getting quirks of some kind.

#27 Lily from animove

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 13,891 posts
  • LocationOn a dropship to Terra

Posted 13 April 2017 - 03:20 AM

Why dogzilla? looks a lot more like gigan

Posted Image

godzilla doesn't have a round belly

But PGI's verisopn looks liek the entire torso is some straneg lizards head.

Edited by Lily from animove, 13 April 2017 - 03:22 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users