2 replies to this topic

[Greygor 727]

If you put lipstick on a pig, you may make it more adorable to some people. Heck, some people may have been in love with the pig even before the lipstick was put on. However the masses will recognize the pig with it's lipstick and any other frills for what it actually is, a pig. The question is, will PGI take a step back and look at their work and the players comments to recognize that this is just a pig with lipstick?

PGI, I know that you have invested a lot of man hours in this project but it needs a complete overhaul. I know that when a lot of man hours are invested that there is reluctance to scrap a project in it's entirety and start off in a different direction. I think a hard look at what the users/players are saying needs to be seriously taken into consideration. I think that you, PGI, can come up with something we all can be happy with.

All we are asking is that you please don't force a pig, even with lipstick or any other frills on us.

[Zergling]

The web like trees are just a mess, and are an amateurish effort at providing 'choice'.

Choices don't happen by forcing players to take a heap of ****** nodes they don't want to get the ones they do want in a confusing web, but by allowing players to directly choose what they want, with the price of more powerful bonuses naturally being higher to balance them against weaker bonuses.

Edited by Zergling, 26 April 2017 - 01:19 PM.

[L1f3H4ck]

Greygor 727, on 26 April 2017 - 11:57 AM, said:

[...blah...]
All we are asking is that you please don't force a pig, even with lipstick or any other frills on us.

This bothers me. Why "we", when you really should be honest and use "I". You want this, and maybe you're not the only one. But I don't share your opinion, and I know I'm not the only one either. If you got something to say, fine, but don't act like you're speaking for the community.