No replies to this topic

[CK16]

https://mwomercs.com...el-adjustments/

Based off the above link should PGI tweek the model a bit based off of the concept art to the model?

Quote

The barrels are not upside down, meaning the triangles are facing up not down as shown in the concept art. They are also protruding to far out as I said above as well.

So here is what the suggestion I have for a fix (and hopefully a quick fix! )

(Visual above are form Bishop Steiner)

Just simply moving the Gauss Rifles in just by about 2 segments made a world of difference.
It would also end up matching the TRO more with only a bit of the barrel visible form the arm and not the whole barrel.

I mean the MAD IIC and SNV-BR both get their mount points for larger weapons set into the arms more. The Mk II should be the same honestly as these. I know the Devs have said they can not make them GR's larger or smaller as the other mechs in the same weight class, But as shown here. Even the SNV another 90t has the GR much more shielded then the Mk II (that btw those arms were designed to be, shields for the Gauss Rifle just saying )

Hit the Deck, on 30 April 2017 - 04:41 PM, said:

by Tarogato

The nose also seems a bit bulbous compared to the concept art.

There are also other minor translation errors on the arms (the GRs are situated a touch higher on the concept art) and crotch area.

Edited by CK16, 10 May 2017 - 06:41 AM.