Jump to content

Just Occurs To Me... Uac5 Sound...


4 replies to this topic

#1 razenWing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Fearless
  • The Fearless
  • 1,694 posts

Posted 10 August 2017 - 09:23 PM

Why is it not the crisp, higher pitch, almost like glass shattering sound of the rest of the UAC lines?

I mean UAC2, 10s, and 20s all sound consistent because they are new. I get that. But shouldn't UAC5s get a retro fix to make it sound LIKE the rest of the UAC sound??

Honestly, I dunno if IS UAC is better than Clan UAC, but just that sound alone is worth it much more than the Clan version.

If they can update the Clan sound to like that too... sigh...

(PS. also occurs to me that I'm back. And since my original gripe got resolved with a technicality, meh, I'm cool now.)

#2 DaMuchi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • 157 posts

Posted 10 August 2017 - 10:06 PM

IS UAC is better on the foeld, worse in mech lab.

#3 Napoleon_Blownapart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 1,167 posts

Posted 11 August 2017 - 04:20 AM

they screwed up sounds with the new weapons, 4 lb10s chain fired sound like boom tap tap tap boom...

#4 Athom83

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 2,529 posts
  • LocationTFS Aurora, 1000km up.

Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:58 AM

Basically the sounds for all "old" weapons need a pass... maybe except for cUACs and the IS AC/20. Also, the IS LB/20 needs another sound pass as that just sounds pathetic.

#5 razenWing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Fearless
  • The Fearless
  • 1,694 posts

Posted 11 August 2017 - 10:15 AM

i should clarify. I am definitely not complaining in this thread.

In fact, I want to give credit to PGI for job well done with the IS UAC sound. Spamming them in my Proton-Dragon has never felt so good.

I am merely suggesting that UAC5 be updated to the new standard as well, since there's really no point keeping it as the odd ball out.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users