Jump to content

Engine Desync Poll


No replies to this topic

Poll: What is your opinion on engine desync? (53 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like engine desync, and do you think it was executed properly?

  1. Yes, I like engine desync, and I think that mobility values assigned to individual mechs are appropriate. (9 votes [16.98%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.98%

  2. I like the idea of engine desync, but I think that mobility values assigned to individual mechs need further tweaking. (28 votes [52.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.83%

  3. No, I don't like engine desync. I think that mobility should be associated with engine size as before. (16 votes [30.19%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.19%

If you believe that mobility values require further tweaking, what general direction should it take?

  1. Increase overall mech mobility (10 votes [26.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 26.32%

  2. Reduce overall mech mobility (5 votes [13.16%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.16%

  3. Tweak on a per chassis basis (23 votes [60.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.53%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 DGTLDaemon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 746 posts
  • LocationUkraine

Posted 19 May 2017 - 11:42 PM

This is a simple poll about your opinion on engine desync introduced with the latest patch. Just pick one of the choices Posted Image

Edited by DGTLDaemon, 20 May 2017 - 12:39 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users