

The Cougar
#1
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:15 AM
However I noticed something, the cougar was essentially made from an adder with jump jets in mind...because the adder(to my knowledge) never had them...and now we have a problem. The cougar isnt going to have jump jets...so basically, we have an adder with an extreme leaning toward gun boat. Yay, but at the same time...if it was made FOR jump jets...you kind of have to put em in, otherwise you're just kind of doing whatever the hell you want and may as well change the name from mechwarrior online, to like..big stompy robits online..
Dont get me wrong, I'm all for taking liberties in some cases but ignoring something like what the mech was built for is a little extreme i think.
#2
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:23 AM
I loved it in MW4.. was my go to light.
#4
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:25 AM
#5
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:27 AM
#6
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:29 AM
Sorry man, if ever curious if the mech is right check the Sarna page of the mech, it will clarify any issues.
Edited by CK16, 15 June 2017 - 09:37 AM.
#7
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:34 AM
Requiemking, on 15 June 2017 - 09:27 AM, said:
Eh idk, twin ER PPC's, with a decent jump and some ECM? Sounds pretty good firepower for a light. Can play snipey snipey with the other slower Snipes like the Night Gyr.
#8
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:37 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 09:34 AM, said:
Lets not forget, those ERPPCs are in your arms, so if you lose you arms, you are effectively useless for the rest of the match.
#9
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:39 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 09:34 AM, said:
Don't forget CK, it's only using a 175 series engine, that means she is running around with 3 poor dubs... that's going to hurt the ability of it to sink the heat from cERPPCs, at least with the Adder she only has 2 poor dubs....
#10
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:45 AM
#11
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:47 AM
#12
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:49 AM
I think it was a small laser boat.
no JJs though,
#13
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:51 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 09:45 AM, said:
Too much time for people spent spamming alpha strike...
I've been told I'm above average because I can handle four different weapon systems at the same time with ease.....
#14
Posted 15 June 2017 - 09:52 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 09:34 AM, said:
That sounds like a possibility. Though I feel like that wouldn't do the platform full justice. JR7-IIC-2 (stand-in for Cougar with JJ STs and energy arms)
Requiemking, on 15 June 2017 - 09:37 AM, said:
Like the Warhawk-C. It could work, still.

#16
Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:14 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 09:29 AM, said:
Sorry man, if ever curious if the mech is right check the Sarna page of the mech, it will clarify any issues.
That's partially true. The Mad Cat MkII is a standard Battlemech in lore... but its first appearance in the BT universe was in MW4 (it was one of several 'Mechs created for the game which were then canonized), so it was originally an Omnimech. It was only retconned upon its inclusion in the tabletop game. So... lore is flexible, and while the tabletop game sets the standard for lore, it isn't always the original source material so confusion is to be expected.
We also already have a small army of PGI-created variants in this game, so if OP is asking for more Cougars with JJs... it's not as if it would break any taboo against making crap up. It's a slow light- the slowest yet- with bad hitboxes and low-mounted main guns, so it wouldn't exactly break game balance either.
Edited by WrathOfDeadguy, 15 June 2017 - 10:15 AM.
#17
Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:19 AM
#18
Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:33 AM
CK16, on 15 June 2017 - 10:19 AM, said:
The Nightstar 9S was a PGI version of the NSR-9SS, as the 9SS uses an LB with crit splitting in an arm, yet the PGI 9S uses dual UAC/20's, rather than UAC/20+LB-20.
So sometimes PGI fudges a variant when they can't make official ones work for what ever reason.
What I don't like is when they make more than half of the variants up. Both the Mauler and Marauder IIC are examples of them doing this practice...
#19
Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:46 AM
Metus regem, on 15 June 2017 - 10:33 AM, said:
The Nightstar 9S was a PGI version of the NSR-9SS, as the 9SS uses an LB with crit splitting in an arm, yet the PGI 9S uses dual UAC/20's, rather than UAC/20+LB-20.
So sometimes PGI fudges a variant when they can't make official ones work for what ever reason.
What I don't like is when they make more than half of the variants up. Both the Mauler and Marauder IIC are examples of them doing this practice...
While I have no excuse for the Mauler, IICs often don't have many variants. In fact, the Orion IIC has no canon variants beyond the Prime, so of course they made up variants. The Highlander IIC only has three variants in canon, and beyond the Prime none of them are MWO applicable, even considering new tech.
#20
Posted 15 June 2017 - 10:52 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users