13 replies to this topic

[El Bandito]

They will be subject to change, which is the entire point of the PTR. Just copy/paste your feedback to PTR forum.

[Christophe Ivanov]

TEST, TEST, TEST and TEST AGAIN! Keep at it and find the faults, the strengths and anything else in between. REPORT and REPORT more. I do this as part of my job in real life. The more testing that goes on and gets REPORTED, the better convincing PGI gets.

Now's your chance to make a difference!

[Monkey Lover]

El Bandito, on 28 June 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

They will be subject to change, which is the entire point of the PTR. Just copy/paste your feedback to PTR forum.

I dont think they really care to much what we say. They have the few people they listen too and we're not it. Atleast they let us play with some of the toys so i know what not to buy.

[Johnny Z]

Monkey Lover, on 28 June 2017 - 07:07 PM, said:

I dont think they really care to much what we say. They have the few people they listen too and we're not it. Atleast they let us play with some of the toys so i know what not to buy.

Depends if your making sense or not I bet.

[Aim64C]

Johnny Z, on 28 June 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:

Depends if your making sense or not I bet.

Ghost heat.

Do you really think there was a lack of coherent, comprehensible dissent at the time?

[Mechwarrior1441491]

El Bandito, on 28 June 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

They will be subject to change, which is the entire point of the PTR. Just copy/paste your feedback to PTR forum.

If they need to be balanced, like the older weapons have needed, they will be playable in 5 years.

Amazing new content.

[Ruar]

HMGs are a whole new kind of scary good.

MRMs are a whole new kind of bad.

I have very little faith the test feedback will be used properly. Hell, half of the problems could have been spotted before anything hit the test if they had just revealed the stats.

[El Bandito]

Monkey Lover, on 28 June 2017 - 07:07 PM, said:

I dont think they really care to much what we say. They have the few people they listen too and we're not it. Atleast they let us play with some of the toys so i know what not to buy.

Mechwarrior1441491, on 28 June 2017 - 07:53 PM, said:

If they need to be balanced, like the older weapons have needed, they will be playable in 5 years.

I'll give Chris the benefit of the doubt, until I see the changes he will make.

Edited by El Bandito, 28 June 2017 - 08:47 PM.

[Monkey Lover]

El Bandito, on 28 June 2017 - 08:45 PM, said:

I'll give Chris the benefit of the doubt, until I see the changes he will make.

I agree Chris will make changes as he see fit but i dont think any of what we say really matter. Best we can do is make some numbers on the spread sheets.

When he sees not one person uses lbx20, heavyppc or light gauss they will buff them lol

[El Bandito]

Monkey Lover, on 28 June 2017 - 08:50 PM, said:

I agree Chris will make changes as he see fit but i dont think any of what we say really matter. Best we can do is make some numbers on the spread sheets.

When he sees not one person uses lbx20, heavyppc or light gauss they will buff them lol

Hope the buffs will come in matter of months, not years.

[Shifty McSwift]

El Bandito, on 28 June 2017 - 09:09 PM, said:

Hope the buffs will come in matter of months, not years.

I hope a lot of the weapons see serious change from their current stats before the release. Just looking at stats by comparison to the normalised ideals we run builds by today is concerning.

[Y E O N N E]

Promessa, on 28 June 2017 - 06:31 PM, said:

IS uac's, I guess they're okay actually, but they goofed on the ammo and I can't really test the 10's and 20's in a match. That's probably gonna get fixed. Clan burst - 1 works and the burst seems faster, should be fine.

Goofed on the ammo and they dramatically truncated the range of the UAC/10 in a vain effort to make the AC/10 look good.