

Atleast We Know Why We Dont Have Hags
#1
Posted 30 June 2017 - 02:18 PM
I still would like a clear cut answer from PGI on why we didnt get HAGs and X-Pulse. Not that i want whine and complain about the reason, i just simply would like to know the reason.
#2
Posted 30 June 2017 - 02:37 PM
McMurl, on 30 June 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:
I still would like a clear cut answer from PGI on why we didnt get HAGs and X-Pulse. Not that i want whine and complain about the reason, i just simply would like to know the reason.
MG's are hit scan, they've been that way for as long as I've been here (three years now)...
Aside from that, HAG's are 3068+ they didn't make the 3067 cut off for this tech cycle.
#3
Posted 30 June 2017 - 02:46 PM
Quote
clans should get HAGs anyway
because everything else they got is awful
#4
Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:08 PM
RACs have physical projectiles
#5
Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:17 PM
McMurl, on 30 June 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:
Why not? IIRC, TT HAGs are burst firing Gauss weapons, kinda like MWO's interpretation of Clan autocannons.
#6
Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:35 PM
So its a mix of a Gauss, a LBX and a RAC....now thats interesting

Edited by Nesutizale, 30 June 2017 - 03:38 PM.
#7
Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:41 PM
Thread done.
#8
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:04 PM
#9
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:19 PM
El Bandito, on 30 June 2017 - 07:04 PM, said:
I take it historical revisionism now comes in spicy sriracha?
I wouldn't be too worried about IS future tech for now, though. HAGs would be nice, but I'll wait.

#10
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:21 PM
McMurl, on 30 June 2017 - 02:18 PM, said:
well im not really PGI, but,...
HAGs? well we are in Year 3067, HAGs come out in 3068, so thats likely why they are a year away,
X-Pulse? they are Experimental Tech, and to my Knowledge PGI has only ever released Standard Tech,
#11
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:27 PM
Snowbluff, on 30 June 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:
I wouldn't be too worried about IS future tech for now, though. HAGs would be nice, but I'll wait.

Yes, so Clanners should focus to getting PGI to improve what they have received. Of course, there is the option of throwing collective fit like classroom full of babies--I think it sometimes work on PGI.
#12
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:32 PM
El Bandito, on 30 June 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:
We didn't get anything, or rather we won't be. There are no new mechanics in clan equipment. We got wonky LRMs and lightsabers. Civil War era clan tech is pointless. Hell, if clan LRMs weren't nerfed with a minimum range, no one would want ATMS in the first place. :L
I mean, the squeaky wheel does get the grease, but grease here is just not that interesting. I'm not sticking my neck out or putting in the energy for lousy new clan tech. RIP
Edited by Snowbluff, 30 June 2017 - 07:34 PM.
#13
Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:38 PM
Khobai, on 30 June 2017 - 02:46 PM, said:
clans should get HAGs anyway
because everything else they got is awful
I agree to both these statements.
A would be a perfect way to compensate for IS RACS but would still be SUPER OP cause of heat generation or lack there of. Which is probably why they are not in the game and probably never will be unless PGI decides to move to a type of energy draw system over heat.
#14
Posted 01 July 2017 - 04:40 AM
Edited by Magnus Santini, 01 July 2017 - 04:40 AM.
#15
Posted 01 July 2017 - 05:00 AM
#16
Posted 01 July 2017 - 05:16 AM

#17
Posted 01 July 2017 - 05:35 AM
November11th, on 30 June 2017 - 07:38 PM, said:
A would be a perfect way to compensate for IS RACS but would still be SUPER OP cause of heat generation or lack there of. Which is probably why they are not in the game and probably never will be unless PGI decides to move to a type of energy draw system over heat.
Why do you need to compensate for a weapon system that's a dogshit joke weapon in MWO even if it wasn't statistically gimped?
#18
Posted 01 July 2017 - 06:24 AM
Edited by Valhallan, 01 July 2017 - 06:31 AM.
#19
Posted 01 July 2017 - 06:37 AM
Valhallan, on 01 July 2017 - 06:24 AM, said:
Ammo switching coding is impossible for PGI. You should know by now.
#20
Posted 01 July 2017 - 06:41 AM
El Bandito, on 01 July 2017 - 06:37 AM, said:
Well, yes, but I don't think they would need ammo switching for this in game. It'd be an upgrade like artemis. ACs use different ammo than UAC and RACs.
Another option to improve AC would be to increase the base ammo, velocity, etc.
Edited by Snowbluff, 01 July 2017 - 06:42 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users