Jump to content

Comprehensive Feedback On The Civil War Update


17 replies to this topic

#1 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 06:14 PM

Greetings, MechWarriors.

I thought I'd share my own feedback below. It's a long read, and there is no TL;DR at the end, but the cliff notes are in the main body and the interesting parts are in the spoilers if that helps you sort through it.

Enjoy!

Lasers

ER Small Laser: they feel quite nice exactly as they are; good heat, decent range, they feel like okay filler weapons even with their low damage.

ER Medium Laser: it's hard to get a good read on this one; at unquirked ranges, it feels a little hot but, when quirked, you have half of a Large Pulse laser at one ton and then it feels brokenly powerful; could probably use a slight heat reduction (down to ~4.2) and a slight duration increase (up to 0.95 or 1 sec).

Heavy Small Laser: it's too slow and too hot; at least one of them needs to come down, preferably duration (down to 1.1 sec)

Heavy Medium Laser: still too slow, but the heat seems fair given the boating potential on certain 'Mechs (i.e. HBK-IIC-A); might be easier to balance at 9 damage.

Heavy Large Laser: way too slow; heat actually not that big of a deal if you don't boat them, given their weight; could pair well with cER Medium Lasers, missed opportunity to buff 'Mechs like the Shadow Cat in this fashion; suggest duration down to 1.35 sec.

ER Micro Laser: completely underwhelming, but it might pair well with massed machine guns on the ACH and MLX variants not-yet released where you need more room for ammunition.

ER Micro Pulse: similar usage as ER Micro, but the preferred option; it brawls well when massed, better than the current cSPL due to heat on the latter, but you need a *lot* of them.


Discussion:
Spoiler


***

PPCs

Light PPC: standalone, it is a little mediocre as it can't fire four without ghost and the velocity is low; combined with UACs, it's pretty solid, don't really see buffing the ghost and velocity as having much impact on this combination; slight heat inefficiency compared to standard PPC is a good call, but both weapons are too hot; 9 heat for PPC and 4.75 heat for LPPC would be better.

Snub-Nose PPC: cycles too slowly and generates too much heat for the range bracket; might also be worth increasing optimum range to 360, but would like to see it with less heat and faster cycle first; eyeballing 8 heat and 3.25s cycle as a better starting point.

Heavy PPC: weak, doesn't feel worth the 10 ton investment at all; velocity too low and too easy to close on for a weapon that doesn't allow enough room for effective backups except on Assaults and not worth it in anything less than a pair; strongly suggest 15 damage and 15 heat.

Discussion:
Spoiler


***

Ballistics

Ultra AC/2: feels really good, unsure about range adjustment: seems fair against the AC/2, but not the cUAC/2.

Ultra AC/10: weapon feels good, but truncated range is unnecessarily hostile for a weapon commanding 13 tons and 7 slots when the cUAC/10 retains 540 meters; either give the isUAC/10 back its range or buff AC/10 to make it actually useful as a PPFLD implement - 540 m range and 1100 m/s velocity would do it.

Ultra AC/20: weapon feels good, but the range should be 300; does not fill same role as isAC/20, no danger of overlap; not fair for 15-ton and 10 slot weapon to be so penalized next to its 12 ton and 6 slot Clan counterpart.

LB-2X: could probably use a higher base rate of fire to make those slots worth something in spite of the spread; range is good, if still lower than Clans; otherwise indifferent.

LB-5X: Lower range than Clan version with no redeeming traits at all, not even range; could use spread tightened up and higher rate of fire.

LB-20X: extra ammo per ton and range are not enough to overcome the drawbacks of spread damage and being unusable with Light and XL engines; could probably stand to have spread tightened up and higher rate of fire.

Light Gauss: serves no purpose in the game; for everywhere this weapon improves on the deficiencies of the AC/10, it is worse where the AC/10 was okay, making neither a useful option; extra range insufficient to distinguish from normal Gauss, which still does ~13 damage where the LGauss does 8 and they both drop off from there; suggest increasing damage to 10 or dramatically increasing rate of fire and range.

Heavy Gauss: powerful, but overly clumsy to wield at 180 m and overshadowed by the AC/20 in every possible way damage fall-off; hard to recommend taking as anything more than a gimmick; would honestly be more balanced with 25 damage and otherwise identical stats to standard Gauss, as the 18 tons and STD engine requirements are pretty hard; even then it still couldn't match the 50+10 alphas being fired by the Clans.

Light Machine Gun: actually a little more useful than I would have thought, but still a little weak (recommend 0.65 DPS) and it could use a slight ammo adjustment, as it uses ammo at a faster rate

Heavy Machine Gun: very powerful up close, feels good; concerned about the Inner Sphere version being in a different league from the Clan version due to double the weight and with 8x ballistics Clan Lights just over the horizon, something needs to be done about that; possibly more range on the IS version? More ammo per ton?

Rotary AC/2: they may do more DPS per gun than an AC/5, but they can't do it for long enough to matter; you are better off with an AC/5 or an Ultra AC/5 because these things are so hot with such a short firing interval and such a long spin-down time that you can actually render the target defenseless if he starts shooting by dipping into cover to get him to stop and then quickly popping back out to wail on him with impunity as his guns are stuck cycling. That spin up/down should be faster and the firing duration should be longer; in exchange, they should have a hard jam when you reach the end of the bar. Teach people some trigger discipline. They also shouldn't ghost after 2, probably 3 or 4 and not linked with RAC/5.

Rotary AC/5: similar story to RAC/2, only hotter. UAC/5 are better. I'm okay with ghost limit of 2 for these, three could get abusive when combined with un-linked RAC/2. But 2+2 is fine.

Discussion:
Spoiler


***

Missiles

Medium Range Missiles: hit registration seems inconsistent; not enough velocity to be useful at 450 meters, spread could use tightening at longer ranges to make landing a hit rewarding and encourage their use as something other than marginally more flexible SRMs; easily munched by AMS; suggest 450 m/s and a spread of 5.4. Note: these are my thoughts with Artemis installed and the glitch applying; I don't even want to know how bad the weapon is without Artemis.

Rocket Launchers: hit registration seems inconsistent; too powerful for 4v4, gimmicky-to-useless for larger game modes; suggest limiter be placed on number that can be fired together or a total mechanics change (i.e. all RLs fire volleys of the same damage and number indicates number of times it can fire, so RL-20 == 20 shots).

Streak SRMs: inferior in every department to cSSRMs, but at least IS can now delete Clan light rushes in CW if they've got the tonnage to bring them. I don't care much for this weapon system, but it probably wouldn't hurt if PGI threw IS SSRMs a bone and gave them something to make their 90 meter deficit and +50% tonnage have meaning beyond "don't take this gun, ever, go take the Clan variant." IS SRMs have increased damage and decreased spread and it works well, so maybe something along those lines for SSRMs?

ATMs: short range potential is unusable, range is too long, ammo count is too low, projectile health is too low; AMS is close to 100% effective against these at any range they can be used from, better to take any other missile type.

Discussion:
Spoiler


***

Equipment

Light Fusion Engine: a much-welcomed addition to the game, even with the toro-loss penalties; not really much that can be discussed except an examination of penalties when a side is lost, since the LFE does weigh more than the cXL.

Light Ferro: extremely useful, very make-or-break in quite a few instances and pairs well with LFE; not strictly better than Ferro, and Clan Ferro still notably better than either.

Stealth Armor: quite useful for hit-and-fade tactics, almost frustratingly so, but steep heat requirements balance it out on the chassis that would be brokenly powerful with it (Lights).

Laser AMS: hilariously hot; cannot use Laser AMS in combat due to the heat, making it all but completely useless; if players are compelled to cycle the AMS on and off for effectiveness, standard AMS is the clear and obvious choice because 1000 rounds can stretch a long way when cycled and can be left active during combat if necessary.

Light TAG: it's a TAG with less range.

Light Active Probe: it's a non-corporeal Active Probe...with less range.

Targeting Computers: really hard to use with the IS, simply can't justify losing a heatsink for even a Mk. I, let alone a Mk. VIII; loss of laser range increase on the Clan ones removes a balancing dynamic that, IMHO, was actually an interesting one.


Conclusion:
If you've stuck it out to read this far, thank you. A few hours were spent writing this. Please share thoughts below.

Edited by Yeonne Greene, 30 June 2017 - 07:49 PM.


#2 Duvanor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 477 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:43 PM

Just a remark: Unlike SRMs, IS SSRMs do not come at double the clan versions weight. They have 50% more weight and 2/3 the cooldown time to make up for that. So damage per ton should be equal. That does not negate the clans range advantage, but the IS SSRMs are not as bad compared to the clan version as you might think.

#3 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:47 PM

View PostDuvanor, on 30 June 2017 - 07:43 PM, said:

Just a remark: Unlike SRMs, IS SSRMs do not come at double the clan versions weight. They have 50% more weight and 2/3 the cooldown time to make up for that. So damage per ton should be equal. That does not negate the clans range advantage, but the IS SSRMs are not as bad compared to the clan version as you might think.


Fixed the statement. Damage per ton won't be equal, or did you mean DPS per ton?

That said, it's not just about the DPS per ton; with massed cSSRM, you can get more ammo or heatsinks in than massed isSSRM, so there ought to be some give to that.

Edited by Yeonne Greene, 30 June 2017 - 07:49 PM.


#4 Duvanor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 477 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 07:57 PM

Yes, DPS of course. Projectile speed of IS SSRMs is higher than Clan SSRMs too. But I am not sure if 250 compared to 230 makes a measurable difference.

Edit: Same DPS per ton also means, if I do not think in the wrong direction here, that you need less individual launchers for the same amount of damage which makes IS SSRMs less prone to ghost heat.

Edited by Duvanor, 30 June 2017 - 08:01 PM.


#5 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 08:06 PM

View PostDuvanor, on 30 June 2017 - 07:57 PM, said:

Yes, DPS of course. Projectile speed of IS SSRMs is higher than Clan SSRMs too. But I am not sure if 250 compared to 230 makes a measurable difference.

Edit: Same DPS per ton also means, if I do not think in the wrong direction here, that you need less individual launchers for the same amount of damage which makes IS SSRMs less prone to ghost heat.


The thing about SSRMs, though, is that it's more about how much did you cripple that Light in the first shot? The schtick is that a leg is pretty much gone in one go. SSRM24 will let that Locust live to scurry to safety, where cSSRM36 did not.

Against a larger target the DPS per ton makes a bigger impact and the two even out, but Streaks are not really at their best when being used against such targets.

#6 Duvanor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 477 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 08:10 PM

View PostYeonne Greene, on 30 June 2017 - 08:06 PM, said:


The thing about SSRMs, though, is that it's more about how much did you cripple that Light in the first shot? The schtick is that a leg is pretty much gone in one go. SSRM24 will let that Locust live to scurry to safety, where cSSRM36 did not.

Against a larger target the DPS per ton makes a bigger impact and the two even out, but Streaks are not really at their best when being used against such targets.


That was true in the good old cSSRM days. Last time I tried cSSRM 24 Adder or cSSRM 36 MadDog they did not do all too well at crippling anything with one salvo. All the structure and armor buffs and cSSRMs spread are quite effective at preventing that.

#7 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 08:14 PM

View PostDuvanor, on 30 June 2017 - 08:10 PM, said:


That was true in the good old cSSRM days. Last time I tried cSSRM 24 Adder or cSSRM 36 MadDog they did not do all too well at crippling anything with one salvo. All the structure and armor buffs and cSSRMs spread are quite effective at preventing that.


Not quite. It may not kill it outright, but 9 out of 10 you've either disarmed it or legged it. Even my ultra-armored MLX will be done after one hit.

#8 50 50

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,145 posts
  • LocationTo Nova or not to Nova. That is the question.

Posted 30 June 2017 - 08:35 PM

Very good write up.
I won't delve into the numbers but a few tweaks on some of the systems will help.

The bigger step is to change the way some of these weapons actually work so I completely agree with you on those suggestions.

#9 J0anna

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Merciless
  • The Merciless
  • 939 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 08:49 PM

A few observations:

A few mechs (Heavy Metal, Atlas K) do not show the correct weapons - place a RAC 2/RAC 5 on the heavy metal, only the first one appears in the test grounds, the second one isn't listed on your weapon list (and yes there was ammo)

For the atlas K, the second torso mounted laser doesn't appear in your weapons list

The heavy shake for a heavy gauss is a stupid idea - just shoot the other weapons a split second before the gauss - why put something this easily avoided into the game?

ATM's are not worth using, quickly removed from everything,
horrible spread and speed, even the horrid streaks are better

It appears that ghost heat isn't implemented on IS UAC 20's, I was able to double tap 2xUAC 20's 4 times before shutdown (so 16 shots total), if this is really supposed to be the case, you can leave the range where it is, I'll take the lack of ghost heat.

Heavy PPC's at better, but not enough to replace the others.

The Heavy Lasers (especially the mediums) are nicer with the shorter burn.

I tend to like the MRM 30's and 40's, the spread on the 10's and 20's are a bit much (even with artemis)

Hard to believe that shooting 2XRAC 5's is fine, but Rac 5/Rac 2 is supposed to be bad, ghost heat penalty applies to that combo...

More testing to do

#10 Scifi Toughguy

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The Jaws
  • The Jaws
  • 31 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 06:01 AM

View PostJ0anna, on 30 June 2017 - 08:49 PM, said:

...Hard to believe that shooting 2XRAC 5's is fine, but Rac 5/Rac 2 is supposed to be bad, ghost heat penalty applies to that combo...

More testing to do


I find it pretty silly that ghost heat hits that RAC2/RAC5 combo. Isn't that the reason Kodiaks do the UAC10/5 combo, to escape the ghost heat on 4 10s?

#11 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 10:44 AM

So, some updates:


MRMs: feel a lot better with the velocity increase, but using them at their rated 450 meters is still a little bit of a crapshoot.

Heavy Lasers: handle much better now; they feel pretty nice, heat is actually quite fair on them I think; the Heavy Small is the one in need of the most attention, because it's incredibly clumsy. It takes too long to cycle and I think its range is too short. Could perhaps lower the burn on the lot of them just a tiny bit more, by at most 0.1 s.

Micro Lasers: feel pretty weak. Ever since the cSPL nerf, there's been nothing to replace them with on my MLX-B and it kind of blows. Tried micros, but they just don't have the output to be dangerous unless taken in huge groups, which the MLX doesn't have. Actually think the solution is to my MLX problem is to lower the heat on the cSPL a little bit more, but the Micros are still underwhelming.

ATMs: An ATM boat is about as threatening an IS LRM boat, if even that. Still don't see any utility in bringing them.

RACs: much more usable now; I think the damage on them is fine but they could use longer up-time to justify the face-staring required.

LPPC: being able to fire 3 before ghost doesn't really change anything; we could already get that kind of damage without ghost by firing a PPC with an LPPC; sure it cost an extra ton, but it was also slightly colder and I could just swap some of the backup weapons around to gain the weight back. It has to be four to make a difference as a poke weapon. If PGI is so concerned about obsoleting the standard PPC, consider giving the standard PPC a leg up through even lower heat or greater velocity instead of gimping the alternatives. It's not like it doesn't need it.

HPPC: still feels weak. I mean, it's 13 PPFLD, but it's still a 10 ton gun running really hot; in the time it takes to line up and take the shot, the cLPL does almost as much damage to one location and weighs only 60% and deals 30% less heat. Just doesn't feel right. Do like the min-range decay mechanic, though I would also say include it on the standard PPC, too (but not the LPPC). If PGI has to implement the Gauss charge mechanic on the HPPC to justify 15 PPFLD, then do it, please.

SN-PPC: no change, still needs to be colder and faster

LMG: Perfect; that buff put it right where it needs to be. I am actually surprised at how much I use them, being able to get damage out of them across a larger range bracket is incredibly useful. Even on Lights, you can do full damage without having to put yourself as at-risk as MG or HMG.

Light Gauss: really, not much of a change; it doesn't do enough damage to be a worthy PPC companion and it doesn't fire fast enough to compensate for its lack of up-front damage relative to the moderately heavier standard Gauss.

Heavy Gauss: still a gimmicky gun, AC/20 is better. I don't think PGI can force the HGauss to be viable as a close-range weapon like this, it's just not the way the game works. At brawl range, it's all about sustained DPS, and the SRMs and AC/20s and Small lasers have it without breaking the tonnage bank.

#12 Duvanor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 477 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 03:06 PM

The HPPC may be a really hot 10 ton gun, but it is not as heavy as a AC 10 or a Gauss and it does not need ammo or time to charge. Actually that seems pretty decent.

#13 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 04:50 PM

View PostDuvanor, on 01 July 2017 - 03:06 PM, said:

The HPPC may be a really hot 10 ton gun, but it is not as heavy as a AC 10 or a Gauss and it does not need ammo or time to charge. Actually that seems pretty decent.


It's deceptive. It's not really a 10-ton gun, it's a 15 ton gun because that's the number of heatsinks you need to make one usable and, unlike Gauss and AC/10, it doesn't pair well with other energy weapons for obvious reasons.

#14 TheArisen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,040 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 01 July 2017 - 07:43 PM

Nice and well thought out.

#15 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 01 July 2017 - 09:33 PM

Like the topic title and well done. Thanks.

Edited by Johnny Z, 01 July 2017 - 09:33 PM.


#16 Slambot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Warden
  • The Warden
  • 204 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 09:49 PM

I agree with the OP on most of his points. The heavy ppc is useless as is. 10 tons 4 crits for a 13 damage weapon with a huge heat spike.... no. Light PPCs are the only new model ppcs that offer anything useful. They are excellent as they are. Snubbies are too hot with too slow a cooldown to be of any use. MRMs need a bit more tweaking. They are very inconsistent damage dealers at any range and the velocity of the missiles is way too low to be effective against anything beyond standard srm range. To be useful, they need to fire all at once with much much higher velocity. Light gauss needs a 10-15% cooldown reduction to make them capable of some useful damage. Heavy gauss and IS LB 20X need a crit space reduction to 10 crit spots. As they are... nobody will ever use them.

ATMs are great as is. Heavy lasers, especially the medium heavy are pretty good. They really pump out damage at short ranges.

#17 A Baoa Qu

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 38 posts

Posted 01 July 2017 - 10:12 PM

I've found out that almost all of the Civil War stuff works best if only taken sparingly and sprinkled among the older weapons, at least on the test server. The CW tech doesn't feel like replacements at all, if for example you replace all your IS lasers with ER ones and SRM's with MRM's, the end result is a horribly toasty failboat.

But MRM's can work with old medium lasers and ER medium lasers can work with old AC2's and 5's, and SRM's can be paired up with Rockets for a good rear punching assassination.

I was just in a test session on the Caustic Valley in my Summoner SMN-B, and used four SRM6's with a single ATM 9. I shot the SRM's in groups of two and only used the ATM when an enemy moved more than 140 meters away from me, and I never overheated in the match even when brawling on top of the volcano. I did the most damage(over 600) in the match and got two of the killing blows, legging two or three of the enemy mechs. It ended 4-2 in our favour.

Previously I had used four ATM3's with that ATM9 and could barely reach 200-300 dmg in the matches. A single ATM definitely feels a lot better than boating five of them. I also have a laser AMS in this Summoner and it did cause way too much heat combined with those five ATM's, often shutting my mech down when I wasn't prepared for it.

Similarly, I've tried bit of a sniping in a medium mech with the new PPC's and didn't do very well with a Heavy PPC & two Light PPC's, instead finding out that an ER PPC & two Light PPC's work better as it causes less heat and you still have something you can use in close quarters.

My Huntsman has benefited from Heavy Medium lasers when I took four of them combined with two SRM6's and an UAC2, but a Nova with six ER Micro Lasers & three Heavy Mediums was just plain bad. Those Heavy Medium lasers once again work much better when combined with good old ER Small Lasers, at least for me they do.

#18 Y E O N N E

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nimble
  • The Nimble
  • 16,810 posts

Posted 02 July 2017 - 07:33 AM

View PostA Baoa Qu, on 01 July 2017 - 10:12 PM, said:

I've found out that almost all of the Civil War stuff works best if only taken sparingly and sprinkled among the older weapons, at least on the test server. The CW tech doesn't feel like replacements at all, if for example you replace all your IS lasers with ER ones and SRM's with MRM's, the end result is a horribly toasty failboat.



Well, I wouldn't say it's that the new tech sucks when used with other new tech. It's really a matter of choosing the right tools for the job, and some people weren't thinking about the weapons in terms of roles, only tons, slots, and lack of certain existing deficiencies.

Fighting below 300 m? Don't take ERML.
Not building for DPS? Don't take LPPC.
Not fast? Don't take HMG (bring LMG instead).

ERML acually do combo pretty well with MRMs, just don't think you will boat large numbers of MRM20s and ERML and have any decent output. I have a MAD-5D with twin MRM20, four ERML, and a standard LL...and it has a very sustainable 69-point alpha.

View PostSlambot, on 01 July 2017 - 09:49 PM, said:

I agree with the OP on most of his points. The heavy ppc is useless as is. 10 tons 4 crits for a 13 damage weapon with a huge heat spike.... no. Light PPCs are the only new model ppcs that offer anything useful. They are excellent as they are. Snubbies are too hot with too slow a cooldown to be of any use. MRMs need a bit more tweaking. They are very inconsistent damage dealers at any range and the velocity of the missiles is way too low to be effective against anything beyond standard srm range. To be useful, they need to fire all at once with much much higher velocity. Light gauss needs a 10-15% cooldown reduction to make them capable of some useful damage. Heavy gauss and IS LB 20X need a crit space reduction to 10 crit spots. As they are... nobody will ever use them.

ATMs are great as is. Heavy lasers, especially the medium heavy are pretty good. They really pump out damage at short ranges.


Eh, the stream on the MRMs is fine, it's really not a long stream and all sizes of MRM have the same one. It's just too easy to dodge MRMs.

Another poster also said that, at 450 m, they don't really feel mid-ranged. I kind of agree. I mean, 450 m is indeed mid-ranged, but it's on the short side of it. The AC/10, Large Laser, and even the PPC don't really start coming into their own until they get quirked/skilled to 540 and 650 meters, respectively, and even then they need other help from velocity, duration, and heat quirks to actually be good. MRMs fall into that same trap, if you will.

Seems like 450 m weapons are always doomed to be underwhelming.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users